Paper · 2018 · Journal of Integrative Agriculture

Effects of plastic mulching film-induced leaf burning on seedling growth in tobacco cultivation: Different findings beyond conservation view

Ying-chao LIN; Ying-chao LIN; Ke-su WEI; et al.

9
claims
22
verbatim quotes
9
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Solving high-temperature plastic mulching film-induced leaf burning in the first week during tobacco cultivation would take much time and effort. In the present study, the growth as well as the leaf sugar and nicotine contents of seedlings with or without leaf burning induced by high-temperature plastic mulching film were tested at two independent sites in 2015 and 2016 to identify the influence of leaf burning on seedling growth. The results showed that the growth of seedlings with leaf burning was improved with increased leaf area, leaf number and plant height compared to those without leaf burning, combined with an increased seedling survival rate at two sites in two years. In seedlings with leaf burning, the contents of fructose and glucose increased and peaked at 11:00 and 13:00 in the leaf and root, respectively, with an increased root nicotine content beginning at 13:00, highlighting the signalling role of sugars. Activities of antioxidant enzymes including peroxidase (POD), superoxide dismutase (SOD) and catalase (CAT) were all increased in seedlings with leaf burning. More plant biomass was allocated to roots in seedlings with leaf burning with increased root volume compared to control seedlings, which might facilitate the absorption of water and nutrients from the soil. Our findings demonstrate that high-temperature plastic mulching film-induced leaf burning not inhibited but benefited seedling survival and growth, suggesting that the time and labour-consuming manual plucking of burnt leaves can be avoided during tobacco cultivation.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf burning increased seedling leaf area, leaf number, and height.

Treatment
leaf burninge0
Outcome
leaf area, leaf number and plant heighte0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
those without leaf burninge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the growth of seedlings with leaf burning was improved with increased leaf area, leaf number and plant height compared to those without leaf burning”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 459–607 · show in text ↑
t0

“tobacco cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–95 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf burning increased seedling survival at two sites over two years.

Treatment
leaf burninge1
Outcome
seedling survival ratee0
Direction
increasede0
Setting
two sitese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“an increased seedling survival rate at two sites in two years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 623–684 · show in text ↑
e1

“the growth of seedlings with leaf burning was improved”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 459–513 · show in text ↑
t0

“tobacco cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–95 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf fructose and glucose contents increased and peaked at 11:00.

Organ / stage
leafe0
Treatment
leaf burninge1
Outcome
contents of fructose and glucosee0
Direction
increasede0
Value
11:00e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the contents of fructose and glucose increased and peaked at 11:00 and 13:00 in the leaf and root, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 718–829 · show in text ↑
e1

“In seedlings with leaf burning, the contents”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 686–730 · show in text ↑
t0

“tobacco cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–95 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Root fructose and glucose contents increased and peaked at 13:00.

Organ / stage
roote0
Treatment
leaf burninge1
Outcome
contents of fructose and glucosee0
Direction
increasede0
Value
13:00e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the contents of fructose and glucose increased and peaked at 11:00 and 13:00 in the leaf and root, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 718–829 · show in text ↑
e1

“In seedlings with leaf burning, the contents”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 686–730 · show in text ↑
t0

“tobacco cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–95 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf burning increased root nicotine content beginning at 13:00.

Treatment
leaf burninge1
Outcome
root nicotine contente0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
beginning at 13:00e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“an increased root nicotine content beginning at 13:00”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 836–889 · show in text ↑
e1

“In seedlings with leaf burning, the contents”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 686–730 · show in text ↑
t0

“tobacco cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–95 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf burning increased peroxidase, superoxide dismutase, and catalase activities.

Treatment
leaf burninge0
Outcome
Activities of antioxidant enzymes including peroxidase (POD), superoxide dismutase (SOD) and catalase (CAT)e0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Activities of antioxidant enzymes including peroxidase (POD), superoxide dismutase (SOD) and catalase (CAT) were all increased in seedlings with leaf burning”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 935–1092 · show in text ↑
t0

“tobacco cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–95 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf burning increased biomass allocation to roots.

Treatment
leaf burninge0
Outcome
plant biomass was allocated to rootse0
Direction
Moree0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“More plant biomass was allocated to roots in seedlings with leaf burning”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1094–1166 · show in text ↑
t0

“tobacco cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–95 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf burning increased root volume over control seedlings.

Treatment
leaf burninge1
Outcome
root volumee0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
control seedlingse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increased root volume compared to control seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1172–1223 · show in text ↑
e1

“in seedlings with leaf burning with increased root volume”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1136–1193 · show in text ↑
t0

“tobacco cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–95 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest avoiding manual removal of burnt leaves in tobacco cultivation.

Outcome
manual plucking of burnt leaves can be avoidede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the time and labour-consuming manual plucking of burnt leaves can be avoided during tobacco cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1465–1568 · show in text ↑

fire · molecular: metabolites · Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

fire · growth · Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.