Paper · 2018 · Eesti Maaülikool. EMU Dspace

POST herbicide programme for effective weed control in winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)

Pacanoski, Z.; Mehmeti, A.

15
claims
31
verbatim quotes
5
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Field experiments were conducted during two winter wheat - growing seasons to evaluate the efficacy of some new POST herbicides and herbicide combinations for those effective controls of weeds in winter wheat crops in the Republic of Macedonia. The weed population consisted mainly of annua l winter and spring and some perennial weeds. Weediness comprised 116 and 208 plants m - 2 in 2012 – 2013 and 2013 – 2014, respectively, in the Skopje region, and 93 and 114 plants m - 2 in 2012 – 2013 and 2013 – 2014, respectively, in the Probištip region. All POST h erbicides effectively reduced dominant weeds density ( > 93%) in the Skopje region in both years, as well as in the Probištip region in 2012 – 2013, but not in 2013 – 2014. In this year, lower temperature directly following application decreased efficacy of POS T applied herbicides, which provided control of Lolium perenne that was between 76 and 84%; control of A. ludoviciana was less than 85%; control of B. radians was no more than 83% and no one treatment controlled P. convolvulus more than 82%. Wheat yields i n the Skopje region were not significant among years for the different POST herbicide applications and ranged between 3,580 and 3,720 kg ha - 1 in 2012 – 2013, and between 3,760 and 3,910 kg ha - 1 in 2013 – 2014. A significant treatment by year interaction resulted in two distinct years for wheat yields in the Probištip region with POST herbicides. In 2012 – 2013, wheat yields were between 3,230 and 3,390 kg ha - 1 , but in 2013 – 2014, wheat yields ranged from 3,060 to 3,4 90 kg ha - 1 and weed - free control showed a significant higher wheat yield compared to all evaluated herbicides.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 15

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Weed density was 116 and 208 plants m - 2 in Skopje across the two seasons.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Interactor
weedst1weed
Outcome
Weedinesse0
Value
116 and 208 plants m - 2e0
Setting
Skopje regione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Weediness comprised 116 and 208 plants m - 2 in 2012 – 2013 and 2013 – 2014, respectively, in the Skopje region”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 337–448 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–67 · show in text ↑
t1

“some perennial weeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 315–335 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Weed density was 93 and 114 plants m - 2 in Probištip across the two seasons.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Interactor
weedst1weed
Outcome
Weedinesse1
Value
93 and 114 plants m - 2e0
Setting
Probištip regione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“93 and 114 plants m - 2 in 2012 – 2013 and 2013 – 2014, respectively, in the Probištip region”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 454–547 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–67 · show in text ↑
t1

“some perennial weeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 315–335 · show in text ↑
e1

“Weediness comprised”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 337–356 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

POST herbicides reduced dominant weed density by over 93% in Skopje in both years and Probištip in 2012–2013.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
POST h erbicidese0
Interactor
weedse0weed
Outcome
dominant weeds densitye0
Direction
reducede0
Value
> 93%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“All POST h erbicides effectively reduced dominant weeds density ( > 93%) in the Skopje region in both years, as well as in the Probištip region in 2012 – 2013”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 549–707 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–67 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lower temperature after application decreased POST herbicide efficacy in 2013–2014.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
lower temperature directly following applicatione0
Outcome
efficacy of POS T applied herbicidese0
Direction
decreasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“lower temperature directly following application decreased efficacy of POS T applied herbicides”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 747–842 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–67 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lolium perenne control ranged from 76 to 84%.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
POS T applied herbicidese1
Interactor
Lolium perenneLolium perennee0weed
Outcome
control of Lolium perennee0
Value
76 and 84%e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Lolium perenne
Lolium perenne · InteractorRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“control of Lolium perenne that was between 76 and 84%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 859–912 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–67 · show in text ↑
e1

“POS T applied herbicides”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 818–842 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A. ludoviciana control was below 85%.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
POS T applied herbicidese1
Interactor
A. ludovicianae0weed
Outcome
control of A. ludovicianae0
Direction
less thane0
Value
85%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“control of A. ludoviciana was less than 85%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 914–957 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–67 · show in text ↑
e1

“POS T applied herbicides”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 818–842 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

B. radians control was at most 83%.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
POS T applied herbicidese1
Interactor
B. radianse0weed
Outcome
control of B. radianse0
Direction
no more thane0
Value
83%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“control of B. radians was no more than 83%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 959–1001 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–67 · show in text ↑
e1

“POS T applied herbicides”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 818–842 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No treatment controlled P. convolvulus above 82%.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
treatmente0
Interactor
P. convolvuluse0weed
Outcome
controlled P. convolvuluse0
Direction
no onee0
Value
82%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“no one treatment controlled P. convolvulus more than 82%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1006–1062 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–67 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Skopje wheat yields did not differ significantly among years under POST herbicides.

Treatment
POST herbicide applicationse0
Outcome
Wheat yieldse0
Setting
Skopje regione0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Wheat yields i n the Skopje region were not significant among years for the different POST herbicide applications”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1064–1177 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Skopje wheat yields ranged from 3,580 to 3,720 kg ha - 1 in 2012–2013.

Outcome
Wheat yieldse1
Value
3,580 and 3,720 kg ha - 1e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“ranged between 3,580 and 3,720 kg ha - 1 in 2012 – 2013”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1182–1237 · show in text ↑
e1

“Wheat yields i n the Skopje region”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1064–1098 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Skopje wheat yields ranged from 3,760 to 3,910 kg ha - 1 in 2013–2014.

Outcome
Wheat yieldse1
Value
3,760 and 3,910 kg ha - 1e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“between 3,760 and 3,910 kg ha - 1 in 2013 – 2014”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1243–1291 · show in text ↑
e1

“Wheat yields i n the Skopje region”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1064–1098 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Treatment by year significantly interacted for Probištip wheat yields.

Treatment
POST herbicidese0
Outcome
wheat yieldse0
Setting
Probištip regione0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A significant treatment by year interaction resulted in two distinct years for wheat yields in the Probištip region with POST herbicides”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1293–1429 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Probištip wheat yields were 3,230 to 3,390 kg ha - 1 in 2012–2013.

Outcome
wheat yieldse0
Value
3,230 and 3,390 kg ha - 1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In 2012 – 2013, wheat yields were between 3,230 and 3,390 kg ha - 1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1431–1498 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Probištip wheat yields were 3,060 to 3,4 90 kg ha - 1 in 2013–2014.

Outcome
wheat yieldse0
Value
3,060 to 3,4 90 kg ha - 1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in 2013 – 2014, wheat yields ranged from 3,060 to 3,4 90 kg ha - 1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1505–1571 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Weed-free control yielded significantly more wheat than all evaluated herbicides in Probištip in 2013–2014.

Treatment
weed - free controle0
Outcome
wheat yielde0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
all evaluated herbicidese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“weed - free control showed a significant higher wheat yield compared to all evaluated herbicides”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1576–1672 · show in text ↑

herbicide · weed · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

herbicide · control · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

39 papers: 34 positive, 5 negative or no effect

33 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

35 papers more in this group

See all 39 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.