Paper · 2018 · Revista Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola e Ambiental

Growth and fiber quality of colored cotton under salinity management strategies

Lauriane A. dos A. Soares; Pedro D. Fernandes; Geovani S. de Lima; et al.

3
claims
3
verbatim quotes
28
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

ABSTRACT Using saline water in the agricultural activity has become a reality in several regions of the world. Due to the increase in the demand for fresh water, it is necessary to use cultivation strategies and genotypes tolerant to saline stress to make the production viable. In this context, effects of irrigation management strategies with low-salinity water (0.8 dS m-1) and high-salinity water (9.0 dS m-1) were evaluated, varying the phenological stages of the plants, on the growth and fiber quality of colored cotton. Three cotton cultivars submitted to seven irrigation management strategies were used, constituting a 3 x 7 factorial scheme, in a randomized block design with three replicates, in plots and in protected environment. Saline water irrigation in the vegetative and flowering stages can be used in cotton cultivation with the lowest losses of growth, phytomass accumulation and fiber quality. Saline water application during boll development is detrimental to the growth and quality of cotton fiber. The genotype BRS Topázio is tolerant to water salinity, with better fiber length, regardless of the development stage.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Saline irrigation during vegetative and flowering stages gave the lowest growth losses.

Treatment
Saline water irrigation in the vegetative and flowering stagese0
Outcome
losses of growth, phytomass accumulation and fiber qualitye0
Direction
loweste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Saline water irrigation in the vegetative and flowering stages can be used in cotton cultivation with the lowest losses of growth, phytomass accumulation and fiber quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 744–915 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Saline irrigation during boll development harmed cotton growth and fiber quality.

Treatment
Saline water application during boll developmente0
Outcome
growth and quality of cotton fibere0
Direction
detrimentale0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Saline water application during boll development is detrimental to the growth and quality of cotton fiber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 917–1022 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

BRS Topázio tolerated water salinity and had better fiber length regardless of stage.

Material
BRS Topázioe0
Outcome
fiber lengthe0
Direction
bettere0
Qualifier
regardless of the development stagee0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“The genotype BRS Topázio is tolerant to water salinity, with better fiber length, regardless of the development stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1024–1141 · show in text ↑

salinity · quality: grain · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

18 papers: 3 positive, 15 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

stage · quality: grain · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

23 papers: 17 positive, 6 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

19 papers more in this group

See all 23 papers →

irrigation · quality: grain · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

134 papers: 73 positive, 61 negative or no effect

72 papers in the same direction as this paper · 55 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

130 papers more in this group

See all 134 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.