Paper · 2018 · Progress in nutrition

Postharvest preservation of citrus fruits (Kinnow) by gamma irradiation and its impact on physicochemical characteristics

Roheena Abdullah; Saba Rashid; Shagufta Naz; et al.

4
claims
5
verbatim quotes
4
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Citrus fruit (Kinnow) has several beneficial health and nutritive properties. Several techniques have been used to preserve postharvest quality of citrus fruits. Exposing foods to gamma radiation delays spoilage and increases protection by eliminating or lowering pathogenic bacteria. In the present study Kinnow fruit were exposed to radiation dose of 0.0, 0.25, 0.50, 0.75, 1.0, 1.5 and 2.0 kGy. Physicochemical and microbial analysis was performed on control and irradiated samples stored at both ambient and refrigerated temperature on weekly intervals. No significant change was observed in physicochemical properties of Kinnow at optimum dose, epiphytic microbial flora reduced in irradiated samples than control samples. The radiation dose of 1.5 kGy along with refrigerated storage extended the shelf-life of Kinnow for 1week without affecting sensory and physicochemical properties.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

At the optimum irradiation dose, Kinnow physicochemical properties showed no significant change.

Taxon
Kinnowe0
Treatment
optimum dosee0
Outcome
physicochemical propertiese0
Direction
No significant changee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“No significant change was observed in physicochemical properties of Kinnow at optimum dose”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 558–648 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irradiated samples had reduced epiphytic microbial flora compared with controls.

Taxon
Kinnowe1
Treatment
irradiated samplese0
Outcome
epiphytic microbial florae0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
control samplese0

Verbatim

e0

“epiphytic microbial flora reduced in irradiated samples than control samples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 650–726 · show in text ↑
e1

“Kinnow fruit were exposed to radiation dose”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 306–349 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A 1.5 kGy dose plus refrigeration extended Kinnow shelf life by one week.

Taxon
Kinnowe0
Treatment
radiation dose of 1.5 kGy along with refrigerated storagee0
Outcome
shelf-lifee0
Direction
extendede0
Value
1weeke0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The radiation dose of 1.5 kGy along with refrigerated storage extended the shelf-life of Kinnow for 1week”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 728–833 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 1.5 kGy with refrigerated storage, Kinnow sensory and physicochemical properties were unaffected.

Taxon
Kinnowe0
Treatment
radiation dose of 1.5 kGy along with refrigerated storagee0
Outcome
sensory and physicochemical propertiese0
Direction
without affectinge0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The radiation dose of 1.5 kGy along with refrigerated storage extended the shelf-life of Kinnow for 1week without affecting sensory and physicochemical properties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 728–890 · show in text ↑

radiation · quality: postharvest · Citrus reticulata (tangerine)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect

2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
See all 3 papers →

storage · quality: general · Citrus reticulata (tangerine)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 6 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

storage · quality: postharvest · Citrus reticulata (tangerine)Positive and negative results

29 papers: 27 positive, 2 negative or no effect

26 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. positive

25 papers more in this group

See all 29 papers →

radiation · quality: general · Citrus reticulata (tangerine)Results agree

4 papers: 0 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.