Paper · 2018 · Acta Horticulturae

Influence of irrigation treatments on the yield and quality of ‘Istrska belica’ olive oil

V. Valenčič; M. Podgornik; D. Bandelj; et al.

15
claims
34
verbatim quotes
2
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

In recent years, Slovenian olive growers and producers have faced problems in achieving constant yields and quality of olive oil due to extreme weather conditions, especially because of the more frequent occurrence of drought. A technically accomplished pilot automatic irrigation system for olive trees was established. In 2015, the impact of different irrigation treatments (0, 15, 33, 40 and 100% ETc (crop evapotranspiration)) on olive cultivar 'Istrska belica' were studied to determine the minimum amount of added water that has a positive effect on the yield and quality of the extra virgin olive oil produced. The study results showed that the quantity of applied water equal to 100% ETc had a significant effect on yield of olive fruits. The average fruit mass of the trees grown under full irrigation (100% ETc) was significantly higher than that of those given rain-fed and deficit irrigation treatments (15, 33 and 40% ETc), with no significant differences found between these treatments. The fatty acid contents showed the highest amount of oleic acid (75.61%) at 100% ETc and the lowest amount (74.69%) at 15% ETc, while the highest amount of linoleic acid (6.52%) was determined at 15% ETc and the lowest (5.98%) at 100% ETc. Total biophenol content and biophenol composition was determined. The 40% ETc irrigation system produced the highest amounts of total biophenols, total oleuropein and total ligstroside derivatives (1076, 562 and 388 mg kg-1, respectively), while the lowest results (883, 477 and 299 mg kg-1, respectively) were determined in the control system (0% ETc). The organoleptic assessment of the olive samples showed that the positive sensory attributes of fruity, bitter and pungent were more intensive at 33% ETc and were graded highest. Olive oil from non-irrigated trees (0% ETc) received the lowest sensory score.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 15

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation at 100% ETc significantly affected olive fruit yield.

Taxon
oliveOlea europaeat0
Treatment
100% ETce0
Outcome
yield of olive fruitse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Olea europaea
Olea europaea · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The study results showed that the quantity of applied water equal to 100% ETc had a significant effect on yield of olive fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 618–745 · show in text ↑
t0

“olive oil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–89 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruit mass at full irrigation exceeded rain fed and deficit irrigation treatments significantly.

Taxon
oliveOlea europaeat0
Treatment
full irrigation (100% ETc)e0
Outcome
average fruit masse0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
rain-fed and deficit irrigation treatments (15, 33 and 40% ETc)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Olea europaea
Olea europaea · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The average fruit mass of the trees grown under full irrigation (100% ETc) was significantly higher than that of those given rain-fed and deficit irrigation treatments (15, 33 and 40% ETc)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 747–935 · show in text ↑
t0

“olive oil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–89 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruit mass did not differ significantly among rain fed and deficit irrigation treatments.

Taxon
oliveOlea europaeat0
Treatment
deficit irrigation treatmentse1
Outcome
fruit masse1
Direction
no significant differencese0
Comparator
rain-fede1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Olea europaea
Olea europaea · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“with no significant differences found between these treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 937–999 · show in text ↑
t0

“olive oil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–89 · show in text ↑
e1

“average fruit mass of the trees grown under full irrigation (100% ETc) was significantly higher than that of those given rain-fed and deficit irrigation treatments (15, 33 and 40% ETc)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 751–935 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Oleic acid content was highest at 100% ETc, reaching 75.61%.

Taxon
oliveOlea europaeat0
Treatment
100% ETce0
Outcome
amount of oleic acide0
Direction
higheste0
Value
75.61%e0
Comparator
15% ETce0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Olea europaea
Olea europaea · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The fatty acid contents showed the highest amount of oleic acid (75.61%) at 100% ETc and the lowest amount (74.69%) at 15% ETc”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1001–1127 · show in text ↑
t0

“olive oil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–89 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Oleic acid content was lowest at 15% ETc, at 74.69%.

Taxon
oliveOlea europaeat0
Treatment
15% ETce0
Outcome
amount of oleic acide0
Direction
loweste0
Value
74.69%e0
Comparator
100% ETce0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Olea europaea
Olea europaea · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The fatty acid contents showed the highest amount of oleic acid (75.61%) at 100% ETc and the lowest amount (74.69%) at 15% ETc”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1001–1127 · show in text ↑
t0

“olive oil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–89 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Linoleic acid content peaked at 15% ETc, at 6.52%.

Taxon
oliveOlea europaeat0
Treatment
15% ETce0
Outcome
amount of linoleic acide0
Direction
higheste0
Value
6.52%e0
Comparator
100% ETce0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Olea europaea
Olea europaea · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the highest amount of linoleic acid (6.52%) was determined at 15% ETc and the lowest (5.98%) at 100% ETc”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1135–1239 · show in text ↑
t0

“olive oil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–89 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Linoleic acid content was lowest at 100% ETc, at 5.98%.

Taxon
oliveOlea europaeat0
Treatment
100% ETce0
Outcome
amount of linoleic acide0
Direction
loweste0
Value
5.98%e0
Comparator
15% ETce0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Olea europaea
Olea europaea · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the highest amount of linoleic acid (6.52%) was determined at 15% ETc and the lowest (5.98%) at 100% ETc”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1135–1239 · show in text ↑
t0

“olive oil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–89 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Total biophenols peaked under 40% ETc irrigation at 1076 mg kg-1.

Taxon
oliveOlea europaeat0
Treatment
40% ETc irrigation systeme0
Outcome
total biophenolse0
Direction
higheste0
Value
1076e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Olea europaea
Olea europaea · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The 40% ETc irrigation system produced the highest amounts of total biophenols, total oleuropein and total ligstroside derivatives (1076, 562 and 388 mg kg-1, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1307–1479 · show in text ↑
t0

“olive oil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–89 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Oleuropein derivatives peaked under 40% ETc irrigation at 562 mg kg-1.

Taxon
oliveOlea europaeat0
Treatment
40% ETc irrigation systeme0
Outcome
total oleuropeine0
Direction
higheste0
Value
562 and 388 mg kg-1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Olea europaea
Olea europaea · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The 40% ETc irrigation system produced the highest amounts of total biophenols, total oleuropein and total ligstroside derivatives (1076, 562 and 388 mg kg-1, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1307–1479 · show in text ↑
t0

“olive oil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–89 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ligstroside derivatives peaked under 40% ETc irrigation at 388 mg kg-1.

Taxon
oliveOlea europaeat0
Treatment
40% ETc irrigation systeme0
Outcome
total ligstroside derivativese0
Direction
higheste0
Value
388 mg kg-1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Olea europaea
Olea europaea · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The 40% ETc irrigation system produced the highest amounts of total biophenols, total oleuropein and total ligstroside derivatives (1076, 562 and 388 mg kg-1, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1307–1479 · show in text ↑
t0

“olive oil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–89 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Total biophenols were lowest under 0% ETc at 883 mg kg-1.

Taxon
oliveOlea europaeat0
Treatment
control system (0% ETc)e0
Outcome
total biophenolse1
Direction
loweste0
Value
883, 477 and 299 mg kg-1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Olea europaea
Olea europaea · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the lowest results (883, 477 and 299 mg kg-1, respectively) were determined in the control system (0% ETc)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1487–1593 · show in text ↑
t0

“olive oil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–89 · show in text ↑
e1

“total biophenols, total oleuropein and total ligstroside derivatives”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1369–1437 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Oleuropein derivatives were lowest under 0% ETc at 477 mg kg-1.

Taxon
oliveOlea europaeat0
Treatment
control system (0% ETc)e0
Outcome
total oleuropeine1
Direction
loweste0
Value
883, 477 and 299 mg kg-1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Olea europaea
Olea europaea · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the lowest results (883, 477 and 299 mg kg-1, respectively) were determined in the control system (0% ETc)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1487–1593 · show in text ↑
t0

“olive oil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–89 · show in text ↑
e1

“total biophenols, total oleuropein and total ligstroside derivatives”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1369–1437 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ligstroside derivatives were lowest under 0% ETc at 299 mg kg-1.

Taxon
oliveOlea europaeat0
Treatment
control system (0% ETc)e0
Outcome
total ligstroside derivativese1
Direction
loweste0
Value
883, 477 and 299 mg kg-1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Olea europaea
Olea europaea · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the lowest results (883, 477 and 299 mg kg-1, respectively) were determined in the control system (0% ETc)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1487–1593 · show in text ↑
t0

“olive oil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–89 · show in text ↑
e1

“total biophenols, total oleuropein and total ligstroside derivatives”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1369–1437 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 33% ETc, fruity, bitter and pungent sensory attributes were most intense and highest graded.

Taxon
oliveOlea europaeat0
Treatment
33% ETce0
Outcome
positive sensory attributes of fruity, bitter and pungente0
Direction
more intensivee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Olea europaea
Olea europaea · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The organoleptic assessment of the olive samples showed that the positive sensory attributes of fruity, bitter and pungent were more intensive at 33% ETc and were graded highest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1595–1772 · show in text ↑
t0

“olive oil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–89 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nonirrigated olive oil received the lowest sensory score.

Taxon
oliveOlea europaeat0
Treatment
non-irrigated trees (0% ETc)e0
Outcome
sensory scoree0
Direction
loweste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Olea europaea
Olea europaea · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Olive oil from non-irrigated trees (0% ETc) received the lowest sensory score”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1774–1851 · show in text ↑
t0

“olive oil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–89 · show in text ↑

irrigation · molecular: metabolites · Olea europaea (common olive)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 3 positive, 5 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.