Paper · 2018 · Weed Technology

Managing Cool-Season Weeds in Sugarbeet Grown for Biofuel in the Southeastern United States

W. Carroll Johnson; Theodore M. Webster; Timothy L. Grey; et al.

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
3
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Sugarbeet, grown for biofuel, is being considered as an alternate cool-season crop in the southeastern U.S. coastal plain. Typically, the crop would be seeded in the autumn, then grow through the winter and be harvested the following spring. Labels for herbicides registered for use on sugarbeet grown in the traditional sugarbeet production regions do not list any of the cool-season weeds common in the southeastern United States. Field trials were initiated near Ty Ty, GA, to evaluate all possible combinations of ethofumesate applied PRE, phenmedipham+desmedipham applied POST, clopyralid POST, and triflusulfuron POST for cool-season weed control in sugarbeet. Phenmedipham+desmedipham alone and in combination with clopyralid and/or triflusulfuron effectively controlled cutleaf eveningprimrose, lesser swinecress, henbit, and corn spurry when applied to seedling weeds. Ethofumesate PRE alone was not as effective in controlling cool-season weeds compared to treatments containing phenmedipham+desmedipham POST. However, ethofumesate PRE applied sequentially with phenmedipham+desmedipham POST improved weed control consistency. Clopyralid and/or triflusulfuron alone did not adequately control cutleaf eveningprimrose. Triflusulfuron alone effectively controlled wild radish. In the 2013–2014 and 2014–2015 seasons, December-applied POST herbicides did not injure sugarbeet. However, in the 2015–2016 season POST herbicides were applied in late October. On the day of treatment, the maximum temperature was 25.4 C, which exceeded the established upper temperature limit of 22 C for safe application of phenmedipham+desmedipham, and sugarbeet plants were severely injured. In the southeastern United States, temperatures frequently exceed 22 C in early autumn, which may limit phenmedipham+desmedipham use for controlling troublesome cool-season weeds of sugarbeet in the region. Weed control options need to be expanded to compensate for this limitation.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Phenmedipham+desmedipham controlled cutleaf eveningprimrose, lesser swinecress, henbit, and corn spurry on seedling weeds.

Treatment
Phenmedipham+desmediphame0
Outcome
controlled cutleaf eveningprimrose, lesser swinecress, henbit, and corn spurrye0
Direction
effectively controllede0
Qualifier
seedling weedse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Phenmedipham+desmedipham alone and in combination with clopyralid and/or triflusulfuron effectively controlled cutleaf eveningprimrose, lesser swinecress, henbit, and corn spurry when applied to seedling weeds.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 676–886 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sugarbeet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–39 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ethofumesate PRE alone controlled cool-season weeds less effectively than POST phenmedipham+desmedipham.

Treatment
Ethofumesate PRE alonee0
Outcome
controlling cool-season weedse0
Direction
not as effectivee0
Comparator
treatments containing phenmedipham+desmedipham POSTe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Ethofumesate PRE alone was not as effective in controlling cool-season weeds compared to treatments containing phenmedipham+desmedipham POST.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 887–1028 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sugarbeet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–39 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sequential ethofumesate PRE and phenmedipham+desmedipham POST improved weed-control consistency.

Treatment
ethofumesate PRE applied sequentially with phenmedipham+desmedipham POSTe0
Outcome
weed control consistencye0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“ethofumesate PRE applied sequentially with phenmedipham+desmedipham POST improved weed control consistency.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1038–1145 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sugarbeet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–39 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Clopyralid alone did not adequately control cutleaf eveningprimrose.

Treatment
Clopyralide0
Interactor
cutleaf eveningprimrosee0weed
Outcome
control cutleaf eveningprimrosee0
Direction
did not adequatelye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Clopyralid and/or triflusulfuron alone did not adequately control cutleaf eveningprimrose.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1146–1236 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sugarbeet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–39 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Triflusulfuron alone did not adequately control cutleaf eveningprimrose.

Treatment
triflusulfurone0
Interactor
cutleaf eveningprimrosee0weed
Outcome
control cutleaf eveningprimrosee0
Direction
did not adequatelye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Clopyralid and/or triflusulfuron alone did not adequately control cutleaf eveningprimrose.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1146–1236 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sugarbeet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–39 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Triflusulfuron alone effectively controlled wild radish.

Treatment
Triflusulfuron alonee0
Interactor
wild radishRaphanus raphanistrume0weed
Outcome
controlled wild radishe0
Direction
effectively controllede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Raphanus raphanistrum
Raphanus raphanistrum · InteractorDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Triflusulfuron alone effectively controlled wild radish.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1237–1293 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sugarbeet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–39 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

December-applied POST herbicides did not injure sugarbeet in 2013–2014 and 2014–2015.

Treatment
December-applied POST herbicidese0
Outcome
injure sugarbeete0
Direction
did not injuree0
Qualifier
2013–2014 and 2014–2015 seasonse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In the 2013–2014 and 2014–2015 seasons, December-applied POST herbicides did not injure sugarbeet.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1294–1392 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sugarbeet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–39 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Late-October POST herbicide application severely injured sugarbeet when maximum temperature was 25.4 C.

Treatment
phenmedipham+desmediphame0
Outcome
sugarbeet plants were severely injurede0
Direction
severely injurede0
Value
25.4 Ce0
Qualifier
upper temperature limit of 22 Ce0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“On the day of treatment, the maximum temperature was 25.4 C, which exceeded the established upper temperature limit of 22 C for safe application of phenmedipham+desmedipham, and sugarbeet plants were severely injured.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1472–1689 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sugarbeet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–39 · show in text ↑

triflusulfuron · control · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

ethofumesate · weed · Beta vulgaris (beet)Results agree

9 papers: 9 positive, 0 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

herbicide · organism · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 6 positive, 4 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.