Paper · 2018 · Turkish Journal Of Field Crops

EFFECT OF SOWING METHODS ON SILAGE YIELD AND QUALITY OF SOME CORN CULTIVARS GROWN IN SECOND CROP SEASON UNDER IRRIGATED CONDITION OF CENTRAL ANATOLIA, TURKEY

Onur ILERI; Emine BUDAKLI CARPICI; Betul ERBEYI; et al.

14
claims
28
verbatim quotes
12
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Silage corn has an important potential as second crop under irrigated lands of semi-arid regions. This research was conducted to determine silage yield and quality of some corn cultivars (Ada, Cadiz, Donana, Sagunto and Sakarya) grown after barley harvest using different sowing methods (direct and conventional) in 2014 and 2015 years in Eskisehir Plain. Investigated parameters were significantly different between years except for leaf ratio and neutral detergent fiber (NDF) content. In the first year, plant height, fresh forage yield, and Fleig point were higher than the second year but dry matter, crude protein, acid detergent fiber (ADF) content, cob ratio and pH were contrarily higher in the second year. Sowing method significantly affected all parameters except leaf ratio. Using direct sowing method increased cob ratio (40.3 %), dry matter (22.93 %), crude protein content (7.56 %), pH (3,76) and Fleig score (85.82) compared to conventional sowing method. Cultivars significantly varied in terms of plant height, cob ratio, dry matter, crude protein, neutral detergent fiber, acid detergent fiber, pH, and Fleig point. Considering the total silage yield and quality the domestic cultivar Ada, which seeds are common in the market, could be suggested after barley harvest for second crop production as long as sown conventionally in irrigated lands of Central Anatolia.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 14

Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Year affected measured traits other than leaf ratio and NDF.

Outcome
Investigated parameterse0
Comparator
yearse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Investigated parameters were significantly different between years except for leaf ratio and neutral detergent fiber (NDF) content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 356–486 · show in text ↑
t0

“CORN”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–65 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plant height, fresh forage yield and Fleig point were higher in the first year.

Outcome
plant height, fresh forage yield, and Fleig pointe0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
second yeare0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In the first year, plant height, fresh forage yield, and Fleig point were higher than the second year”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 488–589 · show in text ↑
t0

“CORN”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–65 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dry matter, crude protein and ADF were higher in the second year.

Outcome
dry matter, crude protein, acid detergent fiber (ADF) contente0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
second yeare0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“dry matter, crude protein, acid detergent fiber (ADF) content, cob ratio and pH were contrarily higher in the second year”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 594–715 · show in text ↑
t0

“CORN”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–65 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cob ratio and pH were higher in the second year.

Outcome
cob ratio and pHe0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
second yeare0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“dry matter, crude protein, acid detergent fiber (ADF) content, cob ratio and pH were contrarily higher in the second year”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 594–715 · show in text ↑
t0

“CORN”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–65 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sowing method significantly affected all parameters except leaf ratio.

Treatment
Sowing methode0
Outcome
all parameters except leaf ratioe0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sowing method significantly affected all parameters except leaf ratio”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 717–786 · show in text ↑
t0

“CORN”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–65 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Direct sowing increased cob ratio to 40.3%.

Treatment
direct sowing methode0
Outcome
cob ratioe0
Direction
increasede0
Value
40.3 %e0
Comparator
conventional sowing methode0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Using direct sowing method increased cob ratio (40.3 %), dry matter (22.93 %), crude protein content (7.56 %), pH (3,76) and Fleig score (85.82) compared to conventional sowing method”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 788–971 · show in text ↑
t0

“CORN”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–65 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Direct sowing increased dry matter to 22.93%.

Treatment
direct sowing methode0
Outcome
dry mattere0
Direction
increasede0
Value
22.93 %e0
Comparator
conventional sowing methode0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Using direct sowing method increased cob ratio (40.3 %), dry matter (22.93 %), crude protein content (7.56 %), pH (3,76) and Fleig score (85.82) compared to conventional sowing method”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 788–971 · show in text ↑
t0

“CORN”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–65 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Direct sowing increased crude protein content to 7.56%.

Treatment
direct sowing methode0
Outcome
crude protein contente0
Direction
increasede0
Value
7.56 %e0
Comparator
conventional sowing methode0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Using direct sowing method increased cob ratio (40.3 %), dry matter (22.93 %), crude protein content (7.56 %), pH (3,76) and Fleig score (85.82) compared to conventional sowing method”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 788–971 · show in text ↑
t0

“CORN”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–65 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Direct sowing increased pH to 3,76.

Treatment
direct sowing methode0
Outcome
pHe0
Direction
increasede0
Value
3,76e0
Comparator
conventional sowing methode0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Using direct sowing method increased cob ratio (40.3 %), dry matter (22.93 %), crude protein content (7.56 %), pH (3,76) and Fleig score (85.82) compared to conventional sowing method”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 788–971 · show in text ↑
t0

“CORN”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–65 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Direct sowing increased Fleig score to 85.82.

Treatment
direct sowing methode0
Outcome
Fleig scoree0
Direction
increasede0
Value
85.82e0
Comparator
conventional sowing methode0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Using direct sowing method increased cob ratio (40.3 %), dry matter (22.93 %), crude protein content (7.56 %), pH (3,76) and Fleig score (85.82) compared to conventional sowing method”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 788–971 · show in text ↑
t0

“CORN”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–65 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Cultivars varied significantly in plant height, cob ratio and dry matter.

Outcome
plant height, cob ratio, dry mattere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cultivars significantly varied in terms of plant height, cob ratio, dry matter, crude protein, neutral detergent fiber, acid detergent fiber, pH, and Fleig point”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 973–1134 · show in text ↑
t0

“CORN”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–65 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Cultivars varied significantly in crude protein, neutral detergent fiber and acid detergent fiber.

Outcome
crude protein, neutral detergent fiber, acid detergent fibere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cultivars significantly varied in terms of plant height, cob ratio, dry matter, crude protein, neutral detergent fiber, acid detergent fiber, pH, and Fleig point”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 973–1134 · show in text ↑
t0

“CORN”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–65 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Cultivars varied significantly in pH and Fleig point.

Outcome
pH, and Fleig pointe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cultivars significantly varied in terms of plant height, cob ratio, dry matter, crude protein, neutral detergent fiber, acid detergent fiber, pH, and Fleig point”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 973–1134 · show in text ↑
t0

“CORN”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–65 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest conventionally sowing Ada after barley harvest in irrigated Central Anatolia.

Material
Adae0
Outcome
could be suggested after barley harvest for second crop production as long as sown conventionallye0
Setting
Central Anatoliae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the domestic cultivar Ada, which seeds are common in the market, could be suggested after barley harvest for second crop production as long as sown conventionally in irrigated lands of Central Anatolia”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1183–1384 · show in text ↑
t0

“CORN”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–65 · show in text ↑

transplanting · growth · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

29 papers: 20 positive, 9 negative or no effect

19 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

25 papers more in this group

See all 29 papers →

transplanting · soil: chemistry · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
See all 2 papers →

transplanting · quality: protein · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.