Paper · 1990 · Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science

Seed Moisture and Transplant Management Techniques Influence Sweet Corn Stand Establishment, Growth, Development, and Yield

Luther Waters; Rhoda L. Burrows; Mark A. Bennett; et al.

6
claims
12
verbatim quotes
22
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A series of experiments exploring the effect of seed moisture and transplant management techniques was conducted with sh2 and su sweet corn (Zea mays L.). The use of seed and transplants in a progression of developmental stages from dry seed to moistened seed to 14-day-old transplants showed that moistened seed had no impact on plant `growth and development. Use of transplants generally had little impact beyond decreasing percent survival and plant height. Increasing the age of transplants reduced the time to maturity and harvest. Increasing the size of the transplant container (paper pot) decreased the time to harvest for younger seedings, but had no other effects. Premoistened seed were successfully held at 10C for up to 72 hours without damage following moisturization. Delays in irrigation of up to 2 days after planting moistened seed had no detrimental effects on sweet corn emergence and growth.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Moistened seed had no impact on sweet corn growth and development.

Taxon
Sweet Cornt0
Treatment
moistened seede1
Outcome
growth and developmente1
Direction
no_changeinferrede1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Sweet Corn Stand Establishment, Growth, Development, and Yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–123 · show in text ↑
e1

“moistened seed had no impact on plant `growth and development”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 298–359 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Use of transplants decreased percent survival and plant height of sweet corn.

Taxon
Sweet Cornt0
Treatment
Use of transplantse2
Outcome
percent survival and plant heighte2
Direction
decreasinge2

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Sweet Corn Stand Establishment, Growth, Development, and Yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–123 · show in text ↑
e2

“Use of transplants generally had little impact beyond decreasing percent survival and plant height”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 361–459 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing the age of transplants reduced the time to maturity and harvest of sweet corn.

Taxon
Sweet Cornt0
Treatment
Increasing the age of transplantse3
Outcome
time to maturity and harveste3
Direction
reducede3

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Sweet Corn Stand Establishment, Growth, Development, and Yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–123 · show in text ↑
e3

“Increasing the age of transplants reduced the time to maturity and harvest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 461–535 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Larger paper pot containers decreased the time to harvest of younger sweet corn seedings.

Taxon
Sweet Cornt0
Treatment
Increasing the size of the transplant container (paper pot)e4
Outcome
time to harveste4
Direction
decreasede4
Qualifier
for younger seedingse4

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Sweet Corn Stand Establishment, Growth, Development, and Yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–123 · show in text ↑
e4

“Increasing the size of the transplant container (paper pot) decreased the time to harvest for younger seedings, but had no other effects”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 537–673 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Premoistened sweet corn seed held at 10C for up to 72 hours showed no damage.

Taxon
Sweet Cornt0
Treatment
held at 10Ce5
Outcome
damagee5
Value
72 hourse5

Verbatim

t0

“Sweet Corn Stand Establishment, Growth, Development, and Yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–123 · show in text ↑
e5

“Premoistened seed were successfully held at 10C for up to 72 hours without damage following moisturization”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 675–781 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Delaying irrigation by up to 2 days after planting moistened seed had no detrimental effect on sweet corn emergence and growth.

Taxon
Sweet Cornt0
Treatment
Delays in irrigation of up to 2 days after plantinge6
Outcome
emergence and growthe6
Direction
no detrimental effectse6

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Sweet Corn Stand Establishment, Growth, Development, and Yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–123 · show in text ↑
e6

“Delays in irrigation of up to 2 days after planting moistened seed had no detrimental effects on sweet corn emergence and growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 783–911 · show in text ↑

transplanting · growth · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

29 papers: 20 positive, 9 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 20 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

25 papers more in this group

See all 29 papers →

transplanting · yield · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

130 papers: 88 positive, 42 negative or no effect

87 papers in the same direction as this paper · 35 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
    Greenhouse-started corn transplanted April 19 yielded no more grain than field-seeded corn started in late April.

    Potential Yield of Corn as Affected by Planting Date · 1969 · compared with plants started as seed in late April

    No difference from an alternativeCited by this paper

  3. positive

126 papers more in this group

See all 130 papers →

irrigation · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

289 papers: 208 positive, 81 negative or no effect

80 papers in the same direction as this paper · 208 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

285 papers more in this group

See all 289 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.