Paper · 2018 · Journal of Plant Nutrition

Effect of nitrogen sources on the yield of common bean ( Phaseolus vulgaris ) in western Kenya

Fanuel Kawaka; Mathews Dida; Peter Opala; et al.

8
claims
11
verbatim quotes
14
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Depletion of soil nutrients due to continuous cultivation without adequate external fertilization is one of the challenges facing many smallholder farmers in western Kenya. This study was conducted to assess the effects of organic (water hyacinth compost), inorganic (urea) nitrogen (N) sources, and commercial Rhizobia inoculant on the yield of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) for two consecutive seasons in the short rains (2013) and long rains (2014). The experiments were laid out in a randomized complete block design and replicated four times. Triple superphosphate was applied to all treatments except those with compost to ensure that the soil had adequate phosphorus (P). Yellow and Rose coco bean varieties grown with urea and inoculated with commercial Rhizobia inoculant gave significantly higher yield of 382 kg ha−1 and 341 kg ha−1, respectively in the short rains (SR) season. In the long rains (LR) season bean yield was high in water hyacinth compost (1526 kg ha−1) and control with non-limiting P (1300 kg ha−1) treatments. Commercial Rhizobia inoculant did not significantly increase in yield in the SR and LR seasons. There was no significant influence on soil properties after two seasons of continuous cultivation of common bean and application of organic and inorganic fertilizers. These results demonstrate that water hyacinth compost improved bean yield in the LR season. However, longer field testing and economic analysis are required for it to be recommended as a substitute for inorganic N source among smallholder farmers.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Yellow bean with urea yielded 382 kg ha−1 in the short rains, significantly higher.

Taxon
beane0
Material
Yellowe0
Treatment
ureae0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
382 kg ha−1e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Yellow and Rose coco bean varieties grown with urea and inoculated with commercial Rhizobia inoculant gave significantly higher yield of 382 kg ha−1 and 341 kg ha−1, respectively in the short rains (SR) season.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 682–892 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Rose coco bean with Rhizobia yielded 341 kg ha−1 in the short rains, significantly higher.

Taxon
beane0
Material
Rose cocoe0
Treatment
inoculated with commercial Rhizobia inoculante0
Interactor
Rhizobiae0symbiont
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
341 kg ha−1e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Yellow and Rose coco bean varieties grown with urea and inoculated with commercial Rhizobia inoculant gave significantly higher yield of 382 kg ha−1 and 341 kg ha−1, respectively in the short rains (SR) season.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 682–892 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bean yield with water hyacinth compost was 1526 kg ha−1 in long rains.

Taxon
beane0
Treatment
water hyacinth composte0
Outcome
bean yielde0
Direction
highe0
Value
1526 kg ha−1e0

Verbatim

e0

“bean yield was high in water hyacinth compost (1526 kg ha−1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 923–983 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bean yield in the non-limiting phosphorus control was 1300 kg ha−1 in long rains.

Taxon
beant0
Treatment
control with non-limiting Pe0
Outcome
control with non-limiting P (1300 kg ha−1) treatmentse0
Value
1300 kg ha−1e0

Verbatim

e0

“control with non-limiting P (1300 kg ha−1) treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 988–1041 · show in text ↑
t0

“bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–54 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Rhizobia inoculant did not significantly increase bean yield in either season.

Taxon
beant0
Treatment
Commercial Rhizobia inoculante0
Interactor
Rhizobiae0symbiont
Outcome
Commercial Rhizobia inoculant did not significantly increase in yield in the SR and LR seasons.e0
Direction
did not significantly increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Commercial Rhizobia inoculant did not significantly increase in yield in the SR and LR seasons.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1043–1138 · show in text ↑
t0

“bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–54 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Two seasons of bean cultivation and fertilizers had no significant influence on soil properties.

Taxon
common beanPhaseolus vulgarise0
Treatment
application of organic and inorganic fertilizerse0
Outcome
soil propertiese0
Direction
no significant influencee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There was no significant influence on soil properties after two seasons of continuous cultivation of common bean and application of organic and inorganic fertilizers.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1139–1305 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water hyacinth compost improved bean yield in the long rains.

Taxon
beane0
Treatment
water hyacinth composte0
Outcome
bean yielde0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“water hyacinth compost improved bean yield in the LR season.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1337–1397 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Longer field testing and economic analysis are required before recommending compost as an inorganic nitrogen substitute.

Taxon
beant0
Outcome
longer field testing and economic analysise0

Verbatim

e0

“longer field testing and economic analysis are required for it to be recommended as a substitute for inorganic N source among smallholder farmers.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1407–1553 · show in text ↑
t0

“common bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–54 · show in text ↑

Pontederia crassipes · yield · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

156 papers: 131 positive, 25 negative or no effect

130 papers in the same direction as this paper · 22 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

152 papers more in this group

See all 156 papers →

inoculation · yield · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

195 papers: 153 positive, 42 negative or no effect

152 papers in the same direction as this paper · 36 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

191 papers more in this group

See all 195 papers →

fertilization · yield · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

376 papers: 331 positive, 45 negative or no effect

330 papers in the same direction as this paper · 42 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

372 papers more in this group

See all 376 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.