Paper · 2018 · Archives of Phytopathology and Plant Protection

Isolation and screening of fungi associated with eggs and females of root-knot nematodes and their biocontrol potential againstMeloidogyne incognitain Bangladesh

F. M. Aminuzzaman; S. N. Jahan; J. Shammi; et al.

6
claims
11
verbatim quotes
7
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

A total of 297 fungal isolates belonging to 20 genera and 33 species were isolated and identified from eggs and females of Meloidogyne spp. in Bangladesh. The predominant genera were Fusarium, Aspergillus and Penicillium; and the significant ones were Purpureocillium, Trichoderma and Pochonia. The 24 well tissue culture plate screening technique was applied for pathogenicity tests against Meloidogyne incognita in vitro. The average percentages of egg parasitism, egg hatch inhibition and juvenile mortality varied significantly and were ranged from 8.2 to 64.9% (p = 0.05), 24.8 to 72.4% (p = 0.05), and 2.3 to 33.1% (p = 0.05), respectively. Two isolates of Purpureocillium lilacinum (PLSAU 1 and PLSAU 2) and one isolate of Pochonia chlamydosporia (PCSAU 1) reduced more than 60% average root galls of tomato, eggplant and cucumber in greenhouse experiments. This is the first investigation of fungi associated with nematodes in the country and their biological control potential against M. incognita.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A total of 297 fungal isolates from 20 genera and 33 species were isolated from eggs and females of Meloidogyne spp. in Bangladesh.

Taxon
Meloidogyne spp.Meloidogynee0
Interactor
Meloidogyne spp.Meloidogynee0pathogen
Outcome
297 fungal isolates belonging to 20 genera and 33 speciese0
Setting
Bangladeshe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Meloidogyne
Meloidogyne · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Photo by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A total of 297 fungal isolates belonging to 20 genera and 33 species were isolated and identified from eggs and females of Meloidogyne spp. in Bangladesh”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–153 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

In vitro, egg parasitism by fungal isolates against M. incognita ranged from 8.2 to 64.9%.

Taxon
Meloidogyne incognitaMeloidogyne incognitae1
Interactor
Meloidogyne incognitaMeloidogyne incognitae1pathogen
Outcome
egg parasitisme2
Value
8.2 to 64.9%e2
Setting
in vitroe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · TaxonPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The 24 well tissue culture plate screening technique was applied for pathogenicity tests against Meloidogyne incognita in vitro”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 295–422 · show in text ↑
e2

“The average percentages of egg parasitism, egg hatch inhibition and juvenile mortality varied significantly and were ranged from 8.2 to 64.9% (p = 0.05), 24.8 to 72.4% (p = 0.05), and 2.3 to 33.1% (p = 0.05), respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 424–645 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

In vitro, egg hatch inhibition of M. incognita ranged from 24.8 to 72.4%.

Taxon
Meloidogyne incognitaMeloidogyne incognitae1
Interactor
Meloidogyne incognitaMeloidogyne incognitae1pathogen
Outcome
egg hatch inhibitione2
Value
24.8 to 72.4%e2
Setting
in vitroe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · TaxonPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The 24 well tissue culture plate screening technique was applied for pathogenicity tests against Meloidogyne incognita in vitro”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 295–422 · show in text ↑
e2

“The average percentages of egg parasitism, egg hatch inhibition and juvenile mortality varied significantly and were ranged from 8.2 to 64.9% (p = 0.05), 24.8 to 72.4% (p = 0.05), and 2.3 to 33.1% (p = 0.05), respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 424–645 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

In vitro, juvenile mortality of M. incognita ranged from 2.3 to 33.1%.

Taxon
Meloidogyne incognitaMeloidogyne incognitae1
Interactor
Meloidogyne incognitaMeloidogyne incognitae1pathogen
Outcome
juvenile mortalitye2
Value
2.3 to 33.1%e2
Setting
in vitroe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · TaxonPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The 24 well tissue culture plate screening technique was applied for pathogenicity tests against Meloidogyne incognita in vitro”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 295–422 · show in text ↑
e2

“The average percentages of egg parasitism, egg hatch inhibition and juvenile mortality varied significantly and were ranged from 8.2 to 64.9% (p = 0.05), 24.8 to 72.4% (p = 0.05), and 2.3 to 33.1% (p = 0.05), respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 424–645 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Two Purpureocillium lilacinum isolates reduced average root galls by more than 60% on tomato, eggplant and cucumber in the greenhouse.

Treatment
Two isolates of Purpureocillium lilacinum (PLSAU 1 and PLSAU 2)e3
Interactor
M. incognitaMeloidogyne incognitae4pathogen
Second interactor
Purpureocillium lilacinumPurpureocillium lilacinume3biocontrol_agent
Outcome
average root gallse3
Direction
reducede3
Value
more than 60%e3
Setting
greenhouse experimentse3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Solanum melongena
Solanum melongena · TaxonBeraDigle · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“Two isolates of Purpureocillium lilacinum (PLSAU 1 and PLSAU 2) and one isolate of Pochonia chlamydosporia (PCSAU 1) reduced more than 60% average root galls of tomato, eggplant and cucumber in greenhouse experiments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 647–863 · show in text ↑
e4

“their biological control potential against M. incognita”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 951–1006 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

One Pochonia chlamydosporia isolate reduced average root galls by more than 60% on tomato, eggplant and cucumber in the greenhouse.

Treatment
one isolate of Pochonia chlamydosporia (PCSAU 1)e3
Interactor
M. incognitaMeloidogyne incognitae4pathogen
Second interactor
Pochonia chlamydosporiaPochonia chlamydosporiae3biocontrol_agent
Outcome
average root gallse3
Direction
reducede3
Value
more than 60%e3
Setting
greenhouse experimentse3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Solanum melongena
Solanum melongena · TaxonBeraDigle · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“Two isolates of Purpureocillium lilacinum (PLSAU 1 and PLSAU 2) and one isolate of Pochonia chlamydosporia (PCSAU 1) reduced more than 60% average root galls of tomato, eggplant and cucumber in greenhouse experiments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 647–863 · show in text ↑
e4

“their biological control potential against M. incognita”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 951–1006 · show in text ↑

Pochonia chlamydosporia · Meloidogyne incognita · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Pochonia chlamydosporia · Meloidogyne incognita · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 11 positive, 1 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

Purpureocillium lilacinum · Meloidogyne incognita · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Pochonia chlamydosporia · Meloidogyne incognita · Solanum melongena (eggplant)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Purpureocillium lilacinum · Meloidogyne incognita · Solanum melongena (eggplant)Results agree

15 papers: 15 positive, 0 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

Purpureocillium lilacinum · Meloidogyne incognita · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

29 papers: 29 positive, 0 negative or no effect

28 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

25 papers more in this group

See all 29 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.