Paper · 2013 · Annals of Agricultural Sciences

Controlling the root-knot nematode, Meloidogyne incognita in cucumber plants using some soil bioagents and some amendments under simulated field conditions

Hanan M. Zakaria; A.S. Kassab; M.M. Shamseldean; et al.

6
claims
16
verbatim quotes
33
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

This study was carried out under simulated field conditions to evaluate the efficacy of some bioagents and soil amendments, as a single or combined treatments, in controlling root-knot nematode Meloidogyne incognita infecting cucumber. Each of the fungus Verticillium chlamydosporium and the symbiotic bacterium Photorhabdus luminescens, as single or joint treatments significantly reduced gall formation and other criteria on cucumber roots. Maximum reduction in gall formation, female numbers, egg-mass production, developmental stages and final population of juveniles in soil, was acquired by these treatments, V. chlamydosporium + P. luminescens, P. luminescens + compost (C) and V. chlamydosporium + P. luminescens + animal compost (AC), compared with the control and other treatments. Applications of all treatments significantly promoted plant growth i.e. length of shoot and root, fresh and dry weight of shoot and root, number of leaves, flowers, fruits and weight of fruits per each plant compared to control (infested plants with nematode only and healthy plants).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Verticillium chlamydosporium alone significantly reduced cucumber root galls and other nematode criteria.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativuse0
Treatment
Verticillium chlamydosporiume0
Interactor
Meloidogyne incognitaMeloidogyne incognitat0pathogen
Second interactor
Verticillium chlamydosporiumPochonia chlamydosporiae0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
gall formation and other criteria on cucumber rootse0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Each of the fungus Verticillium chlamydosporium and the symbiotic bacterium Photorhabdus luminescens, as single or joint treatments significantly reduced gall formation and other criteria on cucumber roots.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 236–442 · show in text ↑
t0

“Meloidogyne incognita”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–57 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Photorhabdus luminescens alone significantly reduced cucumber root galls and other nematode criteria.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativuse0
Treatment
Photorhabdus luminescense0
Interactor
Meloidogyne incognitaMeloidogyne incognitat0pathogen
Second interactor
Photorhabdus luminescensPhotorhabdus luminescense0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
gall formation and other criteria on cucumber rootse0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Photorhabdus luminescens
Photorhabdus luminescens · Second interactorElizabeth Gerdes1, Devang Upadhyay, Sivanadane Mandjiny, Rebecca Bullard-Dillard, Meredith Storms, Michael Menefee, Leonard D. Holmes · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Each of the fungus Verticillium chlamydosporium and the symbiotic bacterium Photorhabdus luminescens, as single or joint treatments significantly reduced gall formation and other criteria on cucumber roots.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 236–442 · show in text ↑
t0

“Meloidogyne incognita”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–57 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The joint microbial treatment maximally reduced galling and nematode population criteria.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
V. chlamydosporium + P. luminescense0
Interactor
Meloidogyne incognitaMeloidogyne incognitat1pathogen
Outcome
gall formation, female numbers, egg-mass productione0
Direction
Maximum reductione0
Comparator
the control and other treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Maximum reduction in gall formation, female numbers, egg-mass production, developmental stages and final population of juveniles in soil, was acquired by these treatments, V. chlamydosporium + P. luminescens, P. luminescens + compost (C) and V. chlamydosporium + P. luminescens + animal compost (AC), compared with the control and other treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 443–791 · show in text ↑
t0

“cucumber plants using some soil bioagents and some amendments under simulated field conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–155 · show in text ↑
t1

“Meloidogyne incognita”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–57 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Photorhabdus with compost maximally reduced galling and nematode population criteria.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
P. luminescens + compost (C)e0
Interactor
Meloidogyne incognitaMeloidogyne incognitat1pathogen
Outcome
gall formation, female numbers, egg-mass productione0
Direction
Maximum reductione0
Comparator
the control and other treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Maximum reduction in gall formation, female numbers, egg-mass production, developmental stages and final population of juveniles in soil, was acquired by these treatments, V. chlamydosporium + P. luminescens, P. luminescens + compost (C) and V. chlamydosporium + P. luminescens + animal compost (AC), compared with the control and other treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 443–791 · show in text ↑
t0

“cucumber plants using some soil bioagents and some amendments under simulated field conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–155 · show in text ↑
t1

“Meloidogyne incognita”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–57 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Both microbes with animal compost maximally reduced galling and nematode population criteria.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
V. chlamydosporium + P. luminescens + animal compost (AC)e0
Interactor
Meloidogyne incognitaMeloidogyne incognitat1pathogen
Outcome
gall formation, female numbers, egg-mass productione0
Direction
Maximum reductione0
Comparator
the control and other treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Maximum reduction in gall formation, female numbers, egg-mass production, developmental stages and final population of juveniles in soil, was acquired by these treatments, V. chlamydosporium + P. luminescens, P. luminescens + compost (C) and V. chlamydosporium + P. luminescens + animal compost (AC), compared with the control and other treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 443–791 · show in text ↑
t0

“cucumber plants using some soil bioagents and some amendments under simulated field conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–155 · show in text ↑
t1

“Meloidogyne incognita”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–57 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

All treatments significantly promoted cucumber shoot and root growth, leaves, flowers, fruit number and fruit weight compared with controls.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
all treatmentse0
Interactor
Meloidogyne incognitaMeloidogyne incognitat1pathogen
Outcome
length of shoot and root, fresh and dry weight of shoot and roote0
Direction
promotede0
Comparator
control (infested plants with nematode only and healthy plants)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Applications of all treatments significantly promoted plant growth i.e. length of shoot and root, fresh and dry weight of shoot and root, number of leaves, flowers, fruits and weight of fruits per each plant compared to control (infested plants with nematode only and healthy plants).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 792–1076 · show in text ↑
t0

“cucumber plants using some soil bioagents and some amendments under simulated field conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–155 · show in text ↑
t1

“Meloidogyne incognita”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–57 · show in text ↑

Pochonia chlamydosporia · Meloidogyne incognita · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

fertilization · Meloidogyne incognita · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.