Paper · 2017 · Journal of Soil and Water Conservation

Effect of integrated nitrogen management and varieties on seed yield, quality and water saving under aerobic rice (Oryza sativa L.)

S.K. Sharma; Y.V. Singh; Suruchi Tyagi; et al.

14
claims
28
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

A field experiment was undertaken during the Kharif seasons of 2009 and 2010 at ICAR-IARI, New Delhi to evaluate the effect of integrated nitrogen management and varieties on seed yield, its quality and water saving under aerobic rice. The experiment conducted in split plot design including two rice varieties viz. ‘Pusa Basmati 1’ and ‘Pusa Basmati 1121’ and eight integrated nitrogen management (INM) practices viz. N control (N0P60 K40); 100% RDN (recommended dose of N i.e., 120 kg N/ha through urea); 75% RDN+ 25% N through farmyard manure (FYM); 75% RDN+ 25% N through Sesbania green manuring; 75% RDN+ 25% N through Azotobacter biofertilizers; 75% RDN+ 25% N through vermicompost; 100% N through FYM+GM+BF+VC and 100% N through FYM+GM+BF+VC+ ZnSO4. The results showed that rice variety ‘Pusa Basmati 1’ showed higher panicle length, filled grains/panicle, spikelet fertility, grain yield, seed yield, harvest indices and germination percentage as compared to ‘Pusa Basmati 1121’. However, ‘Pusa Basmati 1121’ gave higher effective tillers, 1000 seed weight, straw yield, shoot length, root length, seedling dry weight and vigour index than ‘Pusa Basmati 1’. Application of RDN through INM significantly enhanced the yield attributes, seed quality parameters and grain as well straw yield. Treatment with 100% N by FYM+GM+BF+VC+Zn showed highest yield attributes, seed quality parameters, grain and straw yield as compared to other INM treatments and it was followed by the treatments having 100% N by FYM+GM+BF+VC and 75% RDN+25%VC. Significantly higher amount of water was used in flooded transplanted rice than aerobic rice by both the rice varieties resulting in 59.5 to 63% irrigation water saving in aerobic rice. In flooded transplanted and aerobic rice a total of 1529.2 to 1725.2 mm and 929.2 to 1225.2 mm water was used to produce one kg of rice. Thus there was a total saving of 28.4 to 39.6% water in both the rice varieties under aerobic cultivation.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 14

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pusa Basmati 1 exceeded Pusa Basmati 1121 in panicle length, filled grains per panicle, and spikelet fertility.

Material
Pusa Basmati 1e0
Outcome
panicle length, filled grains/panicle, spikelet fertilitye0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
Pusa Basmati 1121e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“rice variety ‘Pusa Basmati 1’ showed higher panicle length, filled grains/panicle, spikelet fertility, grain yield, seed yield, harvest indices and germination percentage as compared to ‘Pusa Basmati 1121’”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 781–986 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice (Oryza sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 109–131 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pusa Basmati 1 exceeded Pusa Basmati 1121 in grain yield, seed yield, and harvest indices.

Material
Pusa Basmati 1e0
Outcome
grain yield, seed yield, harvest indicese0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
Pusa Basmati 1121e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“rice variety ‘Pusa Basmati 1’ showed higher panicle length, filled grains/panicle, spikelet fertility, grain yield, seed yield, harvest indices and germination percentage as compared to ‘Pusa Basmati 1121’”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 781–986 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice (Oryza sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 109–131 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pusa Basmati 1 exceeded Pusa Basmati 1121 in germination percentage.

Material
Pusa Basmati 1e0
Outcome
germination percentagee0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
Pusa Basmati 1121e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“rice variety ‘Pusa Basmati 1’ showed higher panicle length, filled grains/panicle, spikelet fertility, grain yield, seed yield, harvest indices and germination percentage as compared to ‘Pusa Basmati 1121’”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 781–986 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice (Oryza sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 109–131 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pusa Basmati 1121 exceeded Pusa Basmati 1 in effective tillers, 1000 seed weight, and straw yield.

Material
Pusa Basmati 1121e0
Outcome
effective tillers, 1000 seed weight, straw yielde0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
Pusa Basmati 1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“‘Pusa Basmati 1121’ gave higher effective tillers, 1000 seed weight, straw yield, shoot length, root length, seedling dry weight and vigour index than ‘Pusa Basmati 1’”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 997–1164 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice (Oryza sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 109–131 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pusa Basmati 1121 exceeded Pusa Basmati 1 in shoot length, root length, and seedling dry weight.

Material
Pusa Basmati 1121e0
Outcome
shoot length, root length, seedling dry weighte0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
Pusa Basmati 1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“‘Pusa Basmati 1121’ gave higher effective tillers, 1000 seed weight, straw yield, shoot length, root length, seedling dry weight and vigour index than ‘Pusa Basmati 1’”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 997–1164 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice (Oryza sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 109–131 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pusa Basmati 1121 exceeded Pusa Basmati 1 in vigour index.

Material
Pusa Basmati 1121e0
Outcome
vigour indexe0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
Pusa Basmati 1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“‘Pusa Basmati 1121’ gave higher effective tillers, 1000 seed weight, straw yield, shoot length, root length, seedling dry weight and vigour index than ‘Pusa Basmati 1’”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 997–1164 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice (Oryza sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 109–131 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Recommended nitrogen through integrated management significantly improved rice yield attributes and seed quality.

Treatment
RDN through INMe0
Outcome
yield attributes, seed quality parameterse0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of RDN through INM significantly enhanced the yield attributes, seed quality parameters and grain as well straw yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1166–1296 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice (Oryza sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 109–131 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Recommended nitrogen through integrated management significantly improved rice grain and straw yield.

Treatment
RDN through INMe0
Outcome
grain as well straw yielde0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of RDN through INM significantly enhanced the yield attributes, seed quality parameters and grain as well straw yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1166–1296 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice (Oryza sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 109–131 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The FYM+GM+BF+VC+Zn nitrogen treatment produced the highest rice yield attributes and seed quality.

Treatment
100% N by FYM+GM+BF+VC+Zne0
Outcome
yield attributes, seed quality parameterse0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
other INM treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Treatment with 100% N by FYM+GM+BF+VC+Zn showed highest yield attributes, seed quality parameters, grain and straw yield as compared to other INM treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1297–1453 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice (Oryza sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 109–131 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The FYM+GM+BF+VC+Zn nitrogen treatment produced the highest rice grain and straw yield.

Treatment
100% N by FYM+GM+BF+VC+Zne0
Outcome
grain and straw yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
other INM treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Treatment with 100% N by FYM+GM+BF+VC+Zn showed highest yield attributes, seed quality parameters, grain and straw yield as compared to other INM treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1297–1453 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice (Oryza sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 109–131 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Flooded transplanted rice used significantly more water than aerobic rice, with 59.5 to 63% irrigation saving under aerobic cultivation.

Outcome
irrigation water savinge0
Value
59.5 to 63%e0
Comparator
flooded transplanted ricee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Significantly higher amount of water was used in flooded transplanted rice than aerobic rice by both the rice varieties resulting in 59.5 to 63% irrigation water saving in aerobic rice.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1541–1726 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice (Oryza sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 109–131 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Flooded transplanted rice used 1529.2 to 1725.2 mm of water per kg of rice.

Outcome
water was used to produce one kg of ricee0
Value
1529.2 to 1725.2 mme0
Setting
flooded transplantede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In flooded transplanted and aerobic rice a total of 1529.2 to 1725.2 mm and 929.2 to 1225.2 mm water was used to produce one kg of rice.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1727–1863 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice (Oryza sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 109–131 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Aerobic rice used 929.2 to 1225.2 mm of water per kg of rice.

Outcome
water was used to produce one kg of ricee0
Value
929.2 to 1225.2 mme0
Setting
aerobic ricee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In flooded transplanted and aerobic rice a total of 1529.2 to 1725.2 mm and 929.2 to 1225.2 mm water was used to produce one kg of rice.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1727–1863 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice (Oryza sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 109–131 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Aerobic cultivation saved 28.4 to 39.6% water across both rice varieties.

Outcome
watere0
Value
28.4 to 39.6%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“there was a total saving of 28.4 to 39.6% water in both the rice varieties under aerobic cultivation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1869–1970 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice (Oryza sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 109–131 · show in text ↑

zinc atom · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Results differ

419 papers: 389 positive, 30 negative or no effect

388 papers in the same direction as this paper · 28 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

415 papers more in this group

See all 419 papers →

zinc atom · quality: grain · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

22 papers: 21 positive, 1 negative or no effect

20 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

18 papers more in this group

See all 22 papers →

nitrogen · quality: grain · Oryza sativa (rice)Results differ

102 papers: 81 positive, 21 negative or no effect

80 papers in the same direction as this paper · 19 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

98 papers more in this group

See all 102 papers →

transgenic · quality: grain · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 3 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

transgenic · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

102 papers: 81 positive, 21 negative or no effect

80 papers in the same direction as this paper · 18 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

98 papers more in this group

See all 102 papers →

fertilization · quality: grain · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

148 papers: 129 positive, 19 negative or no effect

128 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

144 papers more in this group

See all 148 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

2,045 papers: 1,803 positive, 242 negative or no effect

1,802 papers in the same direction as this paper · 193 in the opposite direction · 49 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

2,041 papers more in this group

See all 2,045 papers →

fertilization · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

3,455 papers: 3,183 positive, 272 negative or no effect

3,182 papers in the same direction as this paper · 207 in the opposite direction · 65 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

3,451 papers more in this group

See all 3,455 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.