Paper · 2018 · Jurnal Ilmu Pertanian Indonesia

Production and Rice Quality of Two Rice Varieties After Lodging and Flooding

Jurusan Budidaya Tanaman Pangan Politeknik Negeri Lampung, Rajabasa, Bandar Lampung 35144; . Dulbari; Edi Santosa; et al.

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
9
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc

Abstract

Rice lodging followed by flooding has negatively detriment on the production, however, scientific evident is still rare. As the incident tends to escalate as the impact of extreme weather, hence, research was conducted in order to evaluate rice production and its quality of two rice genotypes treated with lodging-flooding. The experiment was conducted at Leuwikopo Farm IPB Bogor in July-October 2016 using randomized complete block design using two factors, i.e., variety (Way Seputih and Way Apo Buru) and lodging (no lodged [bending 0-18°], lodged [lodged 38-56°], and lodged with flooded [lodged 76-90°]). Rice hill aged 85 days after transplanting was lodged for 15 days. Results showed that lodged with flooded treatment did not increase yield loss although the plant tended to have sterility 5.59-22.00% higher, grain weight 2.05-35.26% lower, and 0.88-10.66% lower value of rice to unhusked ratio. Grains from the lodged-flooded plant had a number of head rice 13.38-15.78% lower, broken rice 0-24.84% higher, and stimulated germination on 1.33-3.40% grains than lodged-without-flooded. It is important to use rice varieties with stable on milling quality to address the lodged-flooded incident.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lodging with flooding did not increase rice yield loss.

Treatment
lodged with floodede1
Outcome
yield losse1
Direction
did not increasee1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Rice Quality of Two Rice Varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 15–49 · show in text ↑
e1

“lodged with flooded treatment did not increase yield loss although the plant tended to have sterility 5.59-22.00% higher, grain weight 2.05-35.26% lower, and 0.88-10.66% lower value of rice to unhusked ratio”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 699–906 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lodged-flooded rice had 5.59-22.00% higher sterility.

Treatment
lodged with floodede1
Outcome
sterilitye1
Direction
highere1
Value
5.59-22.00%e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Rice Quality of Two Rice Varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 15–49 · show in text ↑
e1

“lodged with flooded treatment did not increase yield loss although the plant tended to have sterility 5.59-22.00% higher, grain weight 2.05-35.26% lower, and 0.88-10.66% lower value of rice to unhusked ratio”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 699–906 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lodged-flooded rice had 2.05-35.26% lower grain weight.

Treatment
lodged with floodede1
Outcome
grain weighte1
Direction
lowere1
Value
2.05-35.26%e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Rice Quality of Two Rice Varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 15–49 · show in text ↑
e1

“lodged with flooded treatment did not increase yield loss although the plant tended to have sterility 5.59-22.00% higher, grain weight 2.05-35.26% lower, and 0.88-10.66% lower value of rice to unhusked ratio”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 699–906 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lodged-flooded rice had 0.88-10.66% lower value of rice to unhusked ratio.

Treatment
lodged with floodede1
Outcome
value of rice to unhusked ratioe1
Direction
lowere1
Value
0.88-10.66%e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Rice Quality of Two Rice Varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 15–49 · show in text ↑
e1

“lodged with flooded treatment did not increase yield loss although the plant tended to have sterility 5.59-22.00% higher, grain weight 2.05-35.26% lower, and 0.88-10.66% lower value of rice to unhusked ratio”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 699–906 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grains from lodged-flooded plants had 13.38-15.78% lower head rice than lodged-without-flooded plants.

Treatment
lodged-flooded plante2
Outcome
head ricee2
Direction
lowere2
Value
13.38-15.78%e2
Comparator
lodged-without-floodede2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Rice Quality of Two Rice Varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 15–49 · show in text ↑
e2

“Grains from the lodged-flooded plant had a number of head rice 13.38-15.78% lower, broken rice 0-24.84% higher, and stimulated germination on 1.33-3.40% grains than lodged-without-flooded”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 908–1095 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grains from lodged-flooded plants had 0-24.84% higher broken rice than lodged-without-flooded plants.

Treatment
lodged-flooded plante2
Outcome
broken ricee2
Direction
highere2
Value
0-24.84%e2
Comparator
lodged-without-floodede2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Rice Quality of Two Rice Varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 15–49 · show in text ↑
e2

“Grains from the lodged-flooded plant had a number of head rice 13.38-15.78% lower, broken rice 0-24.84% higher, and stimulated germination on 1.33-3.40% grains than lodged-without-flooded”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 908–1095 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grains from lodged-flooded plants had stimulated germination on 1.33-3.40% of grains compared with lodged-without-flooded.

Treatment
lodged-flooded plante2
Outcome
germinatione2
Direction
stimulatede2
Value
1.33-3.40%e2
Comparator
lodged-without-floodede2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Rice Quality of Two Rice Varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 15–49 · show in text ↑
e2

“Grains from the lodged-flooded plant had a number of head rice 13.38-15.78% lower, broken rice 0-24.84% higher, and stimulated germination on 1.33-3.40% grains than lodged-without-flooded”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 908–1095 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Rice varieties with stable milling quality should be used to address lodging followed by flooding.

Outcome
use rice varieties with stable on milling qualitye3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Rice Quality of Two Rice Varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 15–49 · show in text ↑
e3

“It is important to use rice varieties with stable on milling quality to address the lodged-flooded incident”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1097–1204 · show in text ↑

flooding · organism · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

14 papers: 8 positive, 6 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

flooding · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

286 papers: 193 positive, 93 negative or no effect

92 papers in the same direction as this paper · 193 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

282 papers more in this group

See all 286 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.