Paper · 2018 · Journal of Plant Nutrition

Influence of summer legume residue recycling and varietal diversification on productivity, energetics, and nutrient dynamics in basmati rice–wheat cropping system of western Indo-Gangetic Plains

Vijay Pooniya; Anil K. Choudhary; R. S. Bana; et al.

7
claims
11
verbatim quotes
16
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted on summer mungbean residue recycling (SMBRR) and basmati rice–wheat cropping system (BRWCS) at New Delhi, India. The SMBRR enhanced the system productivity and net returns by ∼19.1% and 22.1% compared to summer fallow (SF) with highest magnitude under genotypic sequence of P 2511/HD 2967. Two genotypes each in basmati rice (PB 1 and P 2511) and wheat (HD 2967 and HD 2733) responded well to SMBRR with respect to grain yield efficiency index (GYEI) ≥ 1.0. SMBRR also registered ∼13.5% higher microbial biomass carbon (MBC) than SF. Soil organic carbon (SOC) storage also increased by ∼6.8% in 0–30 cm soil layer. The rice–wheat–summer mungbean system produced significantly highest energy efficiency compared to the rice–wheat–summer fallow system with highest values under genotypic sequence of P 2511/HD 2967 as a result of better yield expression. Overall, SMBRR with suitable genotypic sequence improved the system productivity, profitability, and nutrient dynamics in BRWCS, which are vital for long-term sustainability of this system.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Summer mungbean residue recycling increased system productivity by about 19.1% compared with summer fallow.

Taxon
basmati ricet0
Treatment
SMBRRe1
Outcome
system productivitye1
Direction
enhancede1
Value
∼19.1%e1
Qualifier
highest magnitude under genotypic sequence of P 2511/HD 2967e1
Comparator
summer fallow (SF)e1

Verbatim

t0

“basmati rice–wheat cropping system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 128–162 · show in text ↑
e1

“The SMBRR enhanced the system productivity and net returns by ∼19.1% and 22.1% compared to summer fallow (SF) with highest magnitude under genotypic sequence of P 2511/HD 2967”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 146–321 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Summer mungbean residue recycling increased net returns by about 22.1% compared with summer fallow.

Taxon
basmati ricet0
Treatment
SMBRRe1
Outcome
net returnse1
Direction
enhancede1
Value
22.1%e1
Qualifier
highest magnitude under genotypic sequence of P 2511/HD 2967e1
Comparator
summer fallow (SF)e1

Verbatim

t0

“basmati rice–wheat cropping system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 128–162 · show in text ↑
e1

“The SMBRR enhanced the system productivity and net returns by ∼19.1% and 22.1% compared to summer fallow (SF) with highest magnitude under genotypic sequence of P 2511/HD 2967”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 146–321 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Two basmati rice genotypes (PB 1 and P 2511) responded well to summer mungbean residue recycling, with grain yield efficiency index of at least 1.0.

Taxon
basmati ricee2
Material
PB 1 and P 2511e2
Treatment
SMBRRe2
Outcome
grain yield efficiency index (GYEI)e2
Value
≥ 1.0e2
Qualifier
responded welle2

Verbatim

e2

“Two genotypes each in basmati rice (PB 1 and P 2511) and wheat (HD 2967 and HD 2733) responded well to SMBRR with respect to grain yield efficiency index (GYEI) ≥ 1.0”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 323–489 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Two wheat genotypes (HD 2967 and HD 2733) responded well to summer mungbean residue recycling, with grain yield efficiency index of at least 1.0.

Material
HD 2967 and HD 2733e2
Treatment
SMBRRe2
Outcome
grain yield efficiency index (GYEI)e2
Value
≥ 1.0e2
Qualifier
responded welle2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“Two genotypes each in basmati rice (PB 1 and P 2511) and wheat (HD 2967 and HD 2733) responded well to SMBRR with respect to grain yield efficiency index (GYEI) ≥ 1.0”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 323–489 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Summer mungbean residue recycling gave about 13.5% higher microbial biomass carbon than summer fallow.

Taxon
basmati ricet0
Treatment
SMBRRe5
Outcome
microbial biomass carbon (MBC)e5
Direction
highere5
Value
∼13.5%e5
Comparator
SFe5

Verbatim

t0

“basmati rice–wheat cropping system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 128–162 · show in text ↑
e5

“SMBRR also registered ∼13.5% higher microbial biomass carbon (MBC) than SF”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 491–565 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil organic carbon storage increased by about 6.8% in the 0–30 cm soil layer.

Taxon
basmati ricet0
Outcome
Soil organic carbon (SOC) storagee6
Direction
increasede6
Value
∼6.8%e6
Setting
0–30 cm soil layere6

Verbatim

t0

“basmati rice–wheat cropping system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 128–162 · show in text ↑
e6

“Soil organic carbon (SOC) storage also increased by ∼6.8% in 0–30 cm soil layer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 567–646 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The rice–wheat–summer mungbean system produced significantly higher energy efficiency than the rice–wheat–summer fallow system.

Treatment
summer mungbeane7
Outcome
energy efficiencye7
Direction
higheste7
Qualifier
with highest values under genotypic sequence of P 2511/HD 2967e7
Comparator
rice–wheat–summer fallow systeme7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e7

“The rice–wheat–summer mungbean system produced significantly highest energy efficiency compared to the rice–wheat–summer fallow system with highest values under genotypic sequence of P 2511/HD 2967 as a result of better yield expression”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 648–884 · show in text ↑

Vigna radiata · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

30 papers: 25 positive, 5 negative or no effect

24 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

26 papers more in this group

See all 30 papers →

Vigna radiata · soil: biology · Oryza sativa (rice)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.