Paper · 1996 · East African Agricultural and Forestry Journal

Maize Yield Response to Green Manure Application from Selected Shrubs and Tree Species in Western Kenya: A Preliminary Assessment

A. Niang; B. Amadalo; S. Gathumbi; et al.

7
claims
13
verbatim quotes
33
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Three field experiments were carried out to test the response of maize grain yield to the application of green manure from five species of shrubs and one tree species in four sites in Western Kenya. The species tested were Senna (=Cassia) spectabilis, Lantana camara, Tithonia diversifolia, Calliandra calothrysus, Psidium guajava (guava) and Grevillea robusta. At two of the experimental sites, groups of farmers tested the response of maize to the application of green manure from tithonia and lantana under their own field conditions and management. The rate of green manure application ranged from 5 to 20 t/ha on dry matter basis. The control plot that was adopted in this experiment was a continously cropped plot which did not receive green manure. Tithonia and lantana green manure gave the highest maize grain yields (4–5 t/ha) when applied at the rate of 5 t/ha but there were no yield differences between treatments with the two species when the rate of application of green manure was increased to 10 and 20 t/ha. The residual effect from tithonia and lantana green manure was more pronounced than from treatments with phosphoric fertilisers. Farmers realised comparatively higher maize grain yields from the application of tithonia green manure than from lantana although most them did not apply the prescribed quantitites of the green manure. Tithonia was the more preferred manure spices by farmers.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tithonia manure at 5 t/ha gave high maize yield of 4–5 t/ha.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
Tithoniae0
Outcome
maize grain yieldse0
Direction
higheste0
Value
4–5 t/hae0
Comparator
control plote1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Tithonia and lantana green manure gave the highest maize grain yields (4–5 t/ha) when applied at the rate of 5 t/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 756–871 · show in text ↑
e1

“The control plot that was adopted in this experiment was a continously cropped plot which did not receive green manure.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 636–755 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lantana manure at 5 t/ha gave high maize yield of 4–5 t/ha.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
lantana green manuree0
Outcome
maize grain yieldse0
Direction
higheste0
Value
4–5 t/hae0
Comparator
control plote1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Tithonia and lantana green manure gave the highest maize grain yields (4–5 t/ha) when applied at the rate of 5 t/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 756–871 · show in text ↑
e1

“The control plot that was adopted in this experiment was a continously cropped plot which did not receive green manure.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 636–755 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tithonia and lantana yield did not differ at 10 and 20 t/ha.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Treatment
green manuree0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
no yield differencese0
Comparator
the two speciese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“there were no yield differences between treatments with the two species when the rate of application of green manure was increased to 10 and 20 t/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 876–1024 · show in text ↑
e1

“response of maize grain yield to the application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 53–101 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tithonia manure had a more pronounced residual effect than phosphoric fertilizer.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Treatment
tithoniae0
Outcome
residual effecte0
Direction
more pronouncede0
Comparator
phosphoric fertiliserse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The residual effect from tithonia and lantana green manure was more pronounced than from treatments with phosphoric fertilisers.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1026–1154 · show in text ↑
e1

“response of maize grain yield to the application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 53–101 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lantana manure had a more pronounced residual effect than phosphoric fertilizer.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Treatment
lantana green manuree0
Outcome
residual effecte0
Direction
more pronouncede0
Comparator
phosphoric fertiliserse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The residual effect from tithonia and lantana green manure was more pronounced than from treatments with phosphoric fertilisers.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1026–1154 · show in text ↑
e1

“response of maize grain yield to the application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 53–101 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Farmers achieved higher maize yields with tithonia than lantana manure.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
tithonia green manuree0
Outcome
maize grain yieldse0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
lantanae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Farmers realised comparatively higher maize grain yields from the application of tithonia green manure than from lantana although most them did not apply the prescribed quantitites of the green manure.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1155–1356 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Farmers preferred tithonia manure.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Outcome
more preferred manure spices by farmerse0
Direction
more preferrede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Tithonia was the more preferred manure spices by farmers.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1357–1414 · show in text ↑
e1

“response of maize grain yield to the application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 53–101 · show in text ↑

Tithonia · yield · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

fertilization · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

3,908 papers: 3,485 positive, 423 negative or no effect

3,484 papers in the same direction as this paper · 338 in the opposite direction · 85 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

3,904 papers more in this group

See all 3,908 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.