Paper · 2005 · Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science

Maize Yields as Affected by Short‐ and Long‐Term Improved Fallows: A Comparative Analysis in the Asian Humid Tropics

R. Schelbert; U. R. Sangakkara; P. Stamp

3
claims
4
verbatim quotes
1
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Improved short‐ or long‐term fallows are considered suitable low external input technologies for maintaining productivity and sustainability of tropical smallholder upland cropping units, although comparisons on the benefits of this technology are not widely reported. A field study evaluated the impact of improved short (6 months) and long‐term fallow (18 months) using Crotalaria juncea and Tithonia diversifolia , in relation to a natural fallow of the same durations, on the productivity of maize ( Zea mays ), the most important upland cereal in tropical Asia, over a minor season. The use of improved fallows, especially Tithonia, increased maize yields over the Crotalaria or natural fallow. While the overall yields of maize after a long fallow were greater, the beneficial impact of the green manures was significantly higher in the short fallows. The causal factors for this trend, including biomass production of the improved fallows and possible impact on soils, along with the greater benefits of short‐term fallows for increasing maize yields in the tropics due to lower requirements of unproductive time are presented.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tithonia improved fallow increased maize yield relative to Crotalaria or natural fallow.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
Tithoniae0
Outcome
maize yieldse0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
Crotalaria or natural fallowe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The use of improved fallows, especially Tithonia, increased maize yields over the Crotalaria or natural fallow.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 597–708 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maize yield after long fallow was greater.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
long fallowe0
Outcome
yields of maizee0
Direction
greatere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“While the overall yields of maize after a long fallow were greater”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 709–775 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The yield benefit of green manure was significantly greater after short fallow.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
green manurese0
Outcome
beneficial impacte0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
short fallowse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the beneficial impact of the green manures was significantly higher in the short fallows”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 777–865 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–5 · show in text ↑

Tithonia · yield · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

rotation · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

322 papers: 254 positive, 68 negative or no effect

253 papers in the same direction as this paper · 52 in the opposite direction · 16 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

318 papers more in this group

See all 322 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.