Abstract
The commercial value of banana is mainly affected by red rust thrips, Chaetanophothripssignipennis(Bagnall) during fruiting phase at maturity. In this context, the trial was framed at F.R.S., N.A.U., Gandevi under ICAR-AICRP (Fruits) programme. The three years data on efficacy of bio-rational pesticides for management of red rust thrips revealed that bud injection of imidacloprid (0.3 ml/ 500 ml water) @ 1 ml/bud exhibited lowest unblemished fruits up to 8.37% over conventional spraying (20.72%) and bunch sleeving method (42.83%). The comparable results on fruit damage (14.83%) was observed with bud injection of azadirachtin (1%) (5 ml/l water) @ 2 ml/bud over conventional spray. The merit of technology furnished higher no. of unblemished fruits (<10%) and original peel superficial appearance remains impassive under bud injection technique with higher benefit cost ratio with very low dose of pesticide provide financial profit to growers and traders. Besides, imidacloprid residue was not detected in harvested fruits and there is no other technology available to remove this malady of banana
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 5
Claim · model-written summary
Bud injection of imidacloprid gave the lowest unblemished-fruit figure, 8.37%, compared with conventional spraying at 20.72%.
Verbatim
e0“bud injection of imidacloprid (0.3 ml/ 500 ml water) @ 1 ml/bud exhibited lowest unblemished fruits up to 8.37% over conventional spraying (20.72%)”
t0“banana”
t1“red rust thrips”
Claim · model-written summary
Bud injection of imidacloprid gave the lowest unblemished-fruit figure, 8.37%, compared with bunch sleeving at 42.83%.
Verbatim
e0“bud injection of imidacloprid (0.3 ml/ 500 ml water) @ 1 ml/bud exhibited lowest unblemished fruits up to 8.37% over conventional spraying (20.72%) and bunch sleeving method (42.83%)”
t0“banana”
t1“red rust thrips”
Claim · model-written summary
Bud injection of azadirachtin gave comparable results on fruit damage (14.83%) relative to conventional spray.
Verbatim
e0“The comparable results on fruit damage (14.83%) was observed with bud injection of azadirachtin (1%) (5 ml/l water) @ 2 ml/bud over conventional spray”
t0“banana”
t1“red rust thrips”
Claim · model-written summary
Bud injection gave a higher benefit cost ratio.
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“under bud injection technique with higher benefit cost ratio”
t0“banana”
Claim · model-written summary
Imidacloprid residue was not detected in harvested banana fruits.
Not reportedDirection
Verbatim
e0“imidacloprid residue was not detected in harvested fruits”
t0“banana”
The same questions in other papers
azadirachtin · pest · MusaResults agree
5 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
2 papers more in this group
See all 6 papers →application · pest · MusaPositive and negative results
7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- positive
- positive
5 papers more in this group
See all 9 papers →application · yield · MusaResults agree
54 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
51 papers more in this group
See all 55 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.