Paper · 2018 · Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science

Agronomic productivity, nitrogen fertilizer savings and soil organic carbon in conservation agriculture: efficient nitrogen and weed management in maize-wheat system

Anthony Imoudu Oyeogbe; Tapas Kumar Das; Kali Kinkar Bandyopadhyay

7
claims
8
verbatim quotes
14
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Conservation agriculture (CA) practice increases agronomic productivity and soil fertility, yet CA stimulate nitrogen (N) immobilization and weed interference during the early periods of implementation. This study focuses on efficient N management by soil testing and optical sensor (GreenSeekerTM) information; and weed management using brown manuring (Sesbania aculeata co-culture) and herbicide mixtures under CA-based maize (Zea mays L.) – wheat (Triticum aestivum L. emend Fiori & Paol) system in the Indo-Gangetic Plains. Fertilizer N application guided by the optical sensor increased grain yields of maize and wheat up to 20 and 14% (average of two years), respectively, compared to whole N application at sowing. Weed management using brown manuring in maize and herbicide mixtures in wheat increased the grain yields up to 10 and 21%, respectively, over the weedy check. The optical sensor-based N management saved up to 45 and 30 kg N ha–1 of the optimized N fertilizer rate in maize and wheat, respectively, over whole N application. Fertilizer N management coupled with brown manuring resulted in 5 and 4% higher soil organic carbon accumulation. Implementing efficient N fertilizer and weed management in the early years of CA can improve agronomic yield, fertilizer savings, and soil organic carbon content.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sensor-guided nitrogen application raised maize grain yield by up to 20% compared with whole application at sowing.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
Fertilizer N application guided by the optical sensore0
Outcome
grain yieldse0
Direction
increasede0
Value
20e0
Comparator
whole N application at sowinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fertilizer N application guided by the optical sensor increased grain yields of maize and wheat up to 20 and 14% (average of two years), respectively, compared to whole N application at sowing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 528–720 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sensor-guided nitrogen application raised wheat grain yield by up to 14% compared with whole application at sowing.

Treatment
Fertilizer N application guided by the optical sensore0
Outcome
grain yieldse0
Direction
increasede0
Value
14%e0
Comparator
whole N application at sowinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fertilizer N application guided by the optical sensor increased grain yields of maize and wheat up to 20 and 14% (average of two years), respectively, compared to whole N application at sowing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 528–720 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Brown manuring increased maize grain yield by up to 10% over the weedy check.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
brown manuringe0
Outcome
grain yieldse0
Direction
increasede0
Value
10e0
Comparator
weedy checke0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Weed management using brown manuring in maize and herbicide mixtures in wheat increased the grain yields up to 10 and 21%, respectively, over the weedy check”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 722–879 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Herbicide mixtures increased wheat grain yield by up to 21% over the weedy check.

Treatment
herbicide mixturese0
Outcome
grain yieldse0
Direction
increasede0
Value
21%e0
Comparator
weedy checke0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Weed management using brown manuring in maize and herbicide mixtures in wheat increased the grain yields up to 10 and 21%, respectively, over the weedy check”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 722–879 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sensor-guided management saved up to 45 kg N ha–1 in maize.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
optical sensor-based N managemente0
Outcome
optimized N fertilizer ratee0
Direction
savede0
Value
45e0
Comparator
whole N applicatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The optical sensor-based N management saved up to 45 and 30 kg N ha–1 of the optimized N fertilizer rate in maize and wheat, respectively, over whole N application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 881–1044 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sensor-guided management saved up to 30 kg N ha–1 in wheat.

Treatment
optical sensor-based N managemente0
Outcome
optimized N fertilizer ratee0
Direction
savede0
Value
30 kg N ha–1e0
Comparator
whole N applicatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The optical sensor-based N management saved up to 45 and 30 kg N ha–1 of the optimized N fertilizer rate in maize and wheat, respectively, over whole N application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 881–1044 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilizer management with brown manuring increased soil organic carbon accumulation by 5% and 4%.

Taxon
maize-wheatt0
Treatment
Fertilizer N management coupled with brown manuringe0
Outcome
soil organic carbon accumulatione0
Direction
highere0
Value
5 and 4%e0

Verbatim

e0

“Fertilizer N management coupled with brown manuring resulted in 5 and 4% higher soil organic carbon accumulation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1046–1158 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize-wheat system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 147–165 · show in text ↑

herbicide · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

563 papers: 466 positive, 97 negative or no effect

465 papers in the same direction as this paper · 87 in the opposite direction · 10 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

559 papers more in this group

See all 563 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

2,061 papers: 1,737 positive, 324 negative or no effect

1,736 papers in the same direction as this paper · 285 in the opposite direction · 39 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

2,057 papers more in this group

See all 2,061 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

2,185 papers: 1,906 positive, 279 negative or no effect

1,905 papers in the same direction as this paper · 234 in the opposite direction · 45 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

2,181 papers more in this group

See all 2,185 papers →

fertilization · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

3,438 papers: 3,115 positive, 323 negative or no effect

3,114 papers in the same direction as this paper · 284 in the opposite direction · 39 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

3,434 papers more in this group

See all 3,438 papers →

fertilization · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

3,908 papers: 3,485 positive, 423 negative or no effect

3,484 papers in the same direction as this paper · 338 in the opposite direction · 85 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

3,904 papers more in this group

See all 3,908 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.