Paper · 2017 · Open Agriculture

Preliminary observations on use of Beauveria bassiana for the control of the sweet potato weevil (Cylas sp.) in South Africa

Igenicious Hlerema; Sunette Laurie; Bahlebi Eiasu

4
claims
7
verbatim quotes
16
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Abstract Sweet potato weevils (Cylas puncticollis and C. formicarius) are notorious pests of sweet potato and cause severe losses in marketable yield. The study tested the use of Beauveria bassiana ((Balsamo) Vuillemin) (Deuteromycota: Hyphomycetes) for controlling sweet potato weevils. An experiment was conducted using four treatments: 1) dipping sweet potato cuttings in solution of 1 g/litre B. bassiana before planting, 2) spraying with the registered chemical Deltametrin at 50ml/100litre every 2 weeks for four months after planting, 3) spraying the leaves every 2 weeks with B. bassiana (10 g/100 litre) for four months after planting; and 4) a control (sprayed with distilled water). The experimental design was a Latin square with split plot design: pest management strategy as main plot factor and cultivars (Bophelo, Ndou and Blesbok) as subplot factors. Spraying with B. bassiana significantly reduced the percentage of insect damaged roots (5.31%) compared to the control (13.75%). Dipping did not significantly reduce the number of insect damaged roots (12.13%). There was no significant difference between the chemical spray (5.88% insect damage) and spraying with B. bassiana (5.31% insect damage). The preliminary investigation indicated that B. bassiana can be considered as an alternative control method for the sweet potato weevil.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Spraying with Beauveria bassiana significantly reduced insect-damaged sweet potato roots to 5.31%, compared with 13.75% in the control.

Taxon
sweet potatoIpomoea batatase0
Treatment
Spraying with B. bassianae1
Interactor
Cylas puncticollis and C. formicariusCylas formicariusCylas puncticollise0pest
Second interactor
B. bassianaBeauveria bassianae1biocontrol_agent
Outcome
percentage of insect damaged rootse1
Direction
reducede1
Value
5.31%e1
Comparator
controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Cylas formicarius
Cylas formicarius · InteractorCaroline Harding, MAF · CC BY 3.0 au · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Beauveria bassiana
Beauveria bassiana · Second interactorBealeiderman · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sweet potato weevils (Cylas puncticollis and C. formicarius) are notorious pests of sweet potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–105 · show in text ↑
e1

“Spraying with B. bassiana significantly reduced the percentage of insect damaged roots (5.31%) compared to the control (13.75%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 868–995 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Dipping cuttings in Beauveria bassiana solution did not significantly reduce insect-damaged roots (12.13%).

Taxon
sweet potatoIpomoea batatase0
Treatment
Dippinge2
Outcome
number of insect damaged rootse2
Direction
reducee2
Value
12.13%e2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sweet potato weevils (Cylas puncticollis and C. formicarius) are notorious pests of sweet potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–105 · show in text ↑
e2

“Dipping did not significantly reduce the number of insect damaged roots (12.13%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 997–1077 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The chemical spray and Beauveria bassiana spraying gave no significant difference in insect damage (5.88% vs 5.31%).

Taxon
sweet potatoIpomoea batatase0
Treatment
chemical spraye3
Outcome
insect damagee3
Direction
no significant differencee3
Value
5.88%e3
Comparator
spraying with B. bassianae3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sweet potato weevils (Cylas puncticollis and C. formicarius) are notorious pests of sweet potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–105 · show in text ↑
e3

“There was no significant difference between the chemical spray (5.88% insect damage) and spraying with B. bassiana (5.31% insect damage)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1079–1215 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Beauveria bassiana can be considered an alternative control method for the sweet potato weevil.

Taxon
sweet potatoIpomoea batatase4
Interactor
sweet potato weevilCylas formicariuse4pest
Second interactor
B. bassianaBeauveria bassianae4biocontrol_agent
Outcome
alternative control methode4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Cylas formicarius
Cylas formicarius · InteractorCaroline Harding, MAF · CC BY 3.0 au · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Beauveria bassiana
Beauveria bassiana · Second interactorBealeiderman · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“The preliminary investigation indicated that B. bassiana can be considered as an alternative control method for the sweet potato weevil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1217–1352 · show in text ↑

Beauveria bassiana · Cylas puncticollis · Ipomoea batatas (sweet potato)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Beauveria bassiana · Cylas formicarius · Ipomoea batatas (sweet potato)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

application · pest · Ipomoea batatas (sweet potato)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

application · Cylas formicarius · Ipomoea batatas (sweet potato)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.