Paper · 2014 · Journal of Invertebrate Pathology

Laboratory and field efficacy of entomopathogenic fungi for the management of the sweetpotato weevil, Cylas formicarius (Coleoptera: Brentidae)

Gadi V.P. Reddy; Zihua Zhao; Richard A. Humber

4
claims
8
verbatim quotes
81
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

The sweetpotato weevil, Cylas formicarius (F.) (Coleoptera: Brentidae), is one of the most important pests of sweet potatoes in the world. With free trade between the United States and the U.S.-controlled Mariana Islands, C. formicarius has spread along with this commodity. Because of the cryptic nature of the larvae and nocturnal activity of the adults, and the cancellation of long-residual pesticides, this pest has become increasingly difficult to control. Therefore, the present study sought to explore and to compare the effectiveness of Metarhizium brunneum F52 (90ml a.i./ha), Beauveria bassiana GHA (40ml a.i./ha), spinosad (90g a.i./ha), azadirachtin (1484ml a.i./ha), B. bassiana+M. brunneum (20ml a.i./ha+45ml a.i./ha), B. bassiana+azadirachtin (20ml a.i./ha+742ml a.i./ha), B. bassiana+spinosad (20ml a.i./ha+45ml a.i./ha), M. brunneum+azadirachtin (45ml a.i./ha+742ml a.i./ha) and M. brunneum+spinosad (45ml a.i./ha+45 grams a.i./ha) in controlling this pest in both the laboratory and the field. The treatment with B. bassiana+M. brunneum was the most effective in reducing tuber damage by C. formicarius, producing the highest yields. The most adult cadavers were found in plots treated with the combination of two fungi. This combined fungal formulation appears to be appropriate for the practical control of C. formicarius on sweet potatoes.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined Beauveria and Metarhizium treatment reduced weevil tuber damage most effectively.

Taxon
sweet potatoesIpomoea batatast0
Treatment
B. bassiana+M. brunneume0
Interactor
C. formicariusCylas formicariuse0pest
Outcome
tuber damage by C. formicariuse0
Direction
reducinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Cylas formicarius
Cylas formicarius · InteractorCaroline Harding, MAF · CC BY 3.0 au · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The treatment with B. bassiana+M. brunneum was the most effective in reducing tuber damage by C. formicarius”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1013–1121 · show in text ↑
t0

“sweet potatoes in the world”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 110–137 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined fungal treatment produced the highest yields.

Taxon
sweet potatoesIpomoea batatast0
Treatment
B. bassiana+M. brunneume0
Interactor
C. formicariusCylas formicariuse0pest
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Cylas formicarius
Cylas formicarius · InteractorCaroline Harding, MAF · CC BY 3.0 au · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The treatment with B. bassiana+M. brunneum was the most effective in reducing tuber damage by C. formicarius, producing the highest yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1013–1151 · show in text ↑
t0

“sweet potatoes in the world”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 110–137 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plots treated with both fungi had the most adult cadavers.

Taxon
sweet potatoesIpomoea batatast0
Treatment
combination of two fungie0
Interactor
Cylas formicariusCylas formicariuse1pestt0
Outcome
adult cadaverse0
Direction
moste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Cylas formicarius
Cylas formicarius · InteractorCaroline Harding, MAF · CC BY 3.0 au · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The most adult cadavers were found in plots treated with the combination of two fungi”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1153–1238 · show in text ↑
t0

“sweet potatoes in the world”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 110–137 · show in text ↑
e1

“The sweetpotato weevil, Cylas formicarius (F.) (Coleoptera: Brentidae), is one of the most important pests of sweet potatoes in the world.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–138 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors consider the combined fungal formulation suitable for practical weevil control on sweet potatoes.

Taxon
sweet potatoesIpomoea batatase0
Interactor
C. formicariusCylas formicariuse0pest
Outcome
practical control of C. formicarius on sweet potatoese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Cylas formicarius
Cylas formicarius · InteractorCaroline Harding, MAF · CC BY 3.0 au · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This combined fungal formulation appears to be appropriate for the practical control of C. formicarius on sweet potatoes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1240–1360 · show in text ↑

Beauveria bassiana · Cylas formicarius · Ipomoea batatas (sweet potato)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.