Paper · 2018 · Weed Research

Effect of soil moisture during stratification on dormancy release in seeds of five common weed species

X W Hu; X Y Ding; C C Baskin; et al.

13
claims
13
verbatim quotes
17
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Summary Although the effects of cold stratification on the release of physiological dormancy in seeds have been studied extensively, knowledge of the role of soil moisture content on seed dormancy release during cold stratification is limited. Our study determined seed dormancy characteristics and the effect of soil moisture content on seed dormancy breakage during cold stratification in the five common weed species Amaranthus retroflexus , Chenopodium album , Chenopodium hybridum , Plantago lanceolata and Setaria glauca . Seeds of all five species were dormant at the time of harvest and their germination response to light and temperature varied. Soil moisture content had a significant effect on seed dormancy release of all species except P. lanceolata . Germination percentage of A. retroflexus , C. album , C. hybridum increased and then decreased as soil moisture content increased, regardless of germination test temperature. The optimal soil moisture content and seed moisture content for dormancy breakage of A. retroflexus , C. album , C. hybridum were 8%, 12%, 8% and 22.0%, 37.7%, 25.7% respectively. Dry storage (after‐ripening) significantly increased germination of S. glauca . Moreover, increasing soil moisture content first slowed and then increased dormancy breakage in S. glauca . These results suggest that data on soil moisture content should be incorporated into models that predict weed seed dormancy breakage and timing of seedling emergence as well as those for weed management.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Germination responses to light and temperature varied among the species.

Outcome
germination response to light and temperaturee0
Direction
variede0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“their germination response to light and temperature varied”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 595–653 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil moisture significantly affected dormancy release in all species except P. lanceolata.

Taxon
all speciese0
Treatment
Soil moisture contente0
Outcome
seed dormancy releasee0
Qualifier
except P. lanceolatae0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“Soil moisture content had a significant effect on seed dormancy release of all species except P. lanceolata”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 655–762 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Germination of three species rose then fell with increasing soil moisture.

Taxon
A. retroflexus , C. album , C. hybridumChenopodium albumAmaranthus retroflexusChenopodiastrum hybridume0
Outcome
Germination percentagee0
Direction
increased and then decreasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chenopodium album
Chenopodium album · TaxonOlivier Pichard · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Amaranthus retroflexus
Amaranthus retroflexus · TaxonLynk media · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Chenopodiastrum hybridum
Chenopodiastrum hybridum · TaxonHermannSchachner · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Germination percentage of A. retroflexus , C. album , C. hybridum increased and then decreased as soil moisture content increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 765–894 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Optimal soil moisture for A. retroflexus dormancy release was 8%.

Taxon
A. retroflexusAmaranthus retroflexuse0
Outcome
optimal soil moisture contente0
Value
8%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Amaranthus retroflexus
Amaranthus retroflexus · TaxonLynk media · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The optimal soil moisture content and seed moisture content for dormancy breakage of A. retroflexus , C. album , C. hybridum were 8%, 12%, 8% and 22.0%, 37.7%, 25.7% respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 940–1118 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Optimal soil moisture for C. album was 12%.

Taxon
C. albumChenopodium albume0
Outcome
optimal soil moisture contente0
Value
12%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chenopodium album
Chenopodium album · TaxonOlivier Pichard · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The optimal soil moisture content and seed moisture content for dormancy breakage of A. retroflexus , C. album , C. hybridum were 8%, 12%, 8% and 22.0%, 37.7%, 25.7% respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 940–1118 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Optimal soil moisture for C. hybridum was 8%.

Outcome
optimal soil moisture contente0
Value
8%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chenopodiastrum hybridum
Chenopodiastrum hybridum · TaxonHermannSchachner · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The optimal soil moisture content and seed moisture content for dormancy breakage of A. retroflexus , C. album , C. hybridum were 8%, 12%, 8% and 22.0%, 37.7%, 25.7% respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 940–1118 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Optimal seed moisture for A. retroflexus was 22.0%.

Taxon
A. retroflexusAmaranthus retroflexuse0
Outcome
seed moisture contente0
Value
22.0%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Amaranthus retroflexus
Amaranthus retroflexus · TaxonLynk media · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The optimal soil moisture content and seed moisture content for dormancy breakage of A. retroflexus , C. album , C. hybridum were 8%, 12%, 8% and 22.0%, 37.7%, 25.7% respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 940–1118 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Optimal seed moisture for C. album was 37.7%.

Taxon
C. albumChenopodium albume0
Outcome
seed moisture contente0
Value
37.7%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chenopodium album
Chenopodium album · TaxonOlivier Pichard · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The optimal soil moisture content and seed moisture content for dormancy breakage of A. retroflexus , C. album , C. hybridum were 8%, 12%, 8% and 22.0%, 37.7%, 25.7% respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 940–1118 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Optimal seed moisture for C. hybridum was 25.7%.

Outcome
seed moisture contente0
Value
25.7%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chenopodiastrum hybridum
Chenopodiastrum hybridum · TaxonHermannSchachner · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The optimal soil moisture content and seed moisture content for dormancy breakage of A. retroflexus , C. album , C. hybridum were 8%, 12%, 8% and 22.0%, 37.7%, 25.7% respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 940–1118 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Dry storage significantly increased S. glauca germination.

Taxon
S. glaucaCenchrus americanuse0
Treatment
Dry storage (after‐ripening)e0
Outcome
germinatione0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Dry storage (after‐ripening) significantly increased germination of S. glauca”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1120–1197 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing soil moisture first slowed and then increased S. glauca dormancy breakage.

Taxon
S. glaucaCenchrus americanuse0
Outcome
dormancy breakagee0
Direction
slowed and then increasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increasing soil moisture content first slowed and then increased dormancy breakage in S. glauca”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1210–1305 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Models of weed emergence and management should include soil moisture data.

Taxon
weede0
Outcome
data on soil moisture content should be incorporated into modelse0

Verbatim

e0

“data on soil moisture content should be incorporated into models that predict weed seed dormancy breakage and timing of seedling emergence as well as those for weed management”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1335–1510 · show in text ↑

storage · growth · Cenchrus americanus (pearl millet)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 3 positive, 2 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.