Abstract
Bean is one of the most important crops because it is a staple food. In order to control diseases and pests, the use of fungicides and insecticides in the seed treatment are efficient methods. In this sense, the aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of fungicides and insecticides on physiological quality of bean seeds. The experiment was conducted in a laboratory and greenhouse, and seeds of two genotypes of common bean (Peanut and Xamego) were used. The seeds were treated with the following fungicides: Captan, Fluazinam, Metioram and insecticides: Acefate, Imidacloprid and Thiametoxan. The experiment was arranged in a completely randomized design, with replications and seven treatments. Not treated seeds were utilized as control. The bean seeds treatment of the genotype Peanut and Xamego using insecticide and fungicide did not affect the physiological quality of the seeds. Xamego genotypes shows greater vigor in the laboratory, while the Peanut genotype in the greenhouse, and the treatments do not interfere in the initial growth of the plants. Key words: Phaseolus vulgaris L, germination, phytosanitary treatment, seedling emergence, vigor.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 4
Claim · model-written summary
Insecticide and fungicide seed treatment did not affect the physiological quality of Peanut and Xamego bean seeds, compared with untreated seeds.
- Taxon
- common bean
Phaseolus vulgarise2 - Material
- Peanut and Xamegoe1
- Treatment
- insecticide and fungicidee1
- Outcome
- physiological quality of the seedse1
- Direction
- did not affecte1
- Comparator
- Not treated seedse3
- Setting
- laboratory and greenhousee4
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“The bean seeds treatment of the genotype Peanut and Xamego using insecticide and fungicide did not affect the physiological quality of the seeds”
e2“seeds of two genotypes of common bean (Peanut and Xamego) were used”
e3“Not treated seeds were utilized as control”
e4“The experiment was conducted in a laboratory and greenhouse”
Claim · model-written summary
Xamego seeds showed greater vigor in the laboratory.
- Taxon
- common beanPhaseolus vulgarise2
- Material
- Xamegoe5
- Outcome
- vigore5
- Direction
- greatere5
- Setting
- laboratorye5
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e2“seeds of two genotypes of common bean (Peanut and Xamego) were used”
e5“Xamego genotypes shows greater vigor in the laboratory, while the Peanut genotype in the greenhouse, and the treatments do not interfere in the initial growth of the plants”
Claim · model-written summary
Peanut seeds showed greater vigor in the greenhouse.
- Taxon
- common beanPhaseolus vulgarise2
- Material
- Peanute5
- Outcome
- vigore5
- Direction
- greatere5
- Setting
- greenhousee5
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e2“seeds of two genotypes of common bean (Peanut and Xamego) were used”
e5“Xamego genotypes shows greater vigor in the laboratory, while the Peanut genotype in the greenhouse, and the treatments do not interfere in the initial growth of the plants”
Claim · model-written summary
Seed treatments with fungicides and insecticides did not interfere with initial seedling growth of common bean, compared with untreated seeds.
- Taxon
- common beanPhaseolus vulgarise2
- Treatment
- the treatmentse5
- Outcome
- initial growth of the plantse5
- Direction
- do not interferee5
- Comparator
- Not treated seedse3
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e2“seeds of two genotypes of common bean (Peanut and Xamego) were used”
e3“Not treated seeds were utilized as control”
e5“Xamego genotypes shows greater vigor in the laboratory, while the Peanut genotype in the greenhouse, and the treatments do not interfere in the initial growth of the plants”
The same questions in other papers
fungicide · quality: general · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results
1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.