Paper · 1992 · Weed Technology

Integration of Cereal Cover Crops in Ridge-tillage Corn (Zea mays) Production

Allan G. Eadie; Clarence J. Swanton; James E. Shaw; et al.

7
claims
9
verbatim quotes
16
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Field experiments evaluating 11 cereal cover crops were established at two locations in Ontario over a two-year period. Cover crops were interseeded into a ridge-tillage corn crop and evaluated in terms of biomass production and winter annual, biennial, and perennial weed species suppression. Seedling establishment and aboveground biomass production of cover crops were variable between locations and years. At both locations over two years, ‘Danko’ winter rye, ‘OAC Halton’ winter barley and ‘Rodeo’ spring barley were the most consistent cover crops in biomass production. However, cover crop residues had no significant effect on weed biomass or density due to a high degree of spatial variability present in the weed populations. Corn grain yields were not reduced by the presence of inter-seeded cover crops when compared with the bare ground control treatment.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cover-crop establishment and biomass varied between locations and years.

Taxon
cover cropse0
Outcome
Seedling establishment and aboveground biomass productione0
Setting
locationse0

Verbatim

e0

“Seedling establishment and aboveground biomass production of cover crops were variable between locations and years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 294–408 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Danko winter rye consistently produced high biomass.

Taxon
winter ryeSecale cerealee0
Material
‘Danko’e0
Outcome
most consistent cover crops in biomass productione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Secale cereale
Secale cereale · TaxonLSDSL · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“‘Danko’ winter rye, ‘OAC Halton’ winter barley and ‘Rodeo’ spring barley were the most consistent cover crops in biomass production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 444–575 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

OAC Halton winter barley consistently produced high biomass.

Taxon
winter barleyHordeum vulgaree0
Material
‘OAC Halton’e0
Outcome
most consistent cover crops in biomass productione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“‘Danko’ winter rye, ‘OAC Halton’ winter barley and ‘Rodeo’ spring barley were the most consistent cover crops in biomass production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 444–575 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rodeo spring barley consistently produced high biomass.

Taxon
spring barleyHordeum vulgaree0
Material
‘Rodeo’e0
Outcome
most consistent cover crops in biomass productione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“‘Danko’ winter rye, ‘OAC Halton’ winter barley and ‘Rodeo’ spring barley were the most consistent cover crops in biomass production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 444–575 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Cover crop residues had no significant effect on weed biomass.

Treatment
cover crop residuese0
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
weed biomasse0
Direction
no significant effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“cover crop residues had no significant effect on weed biomass or density due to a high degree of spatial variability present in the weed populations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 586–734 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn (Zea mays)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–66 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Cover crop residues had no significant effect on weed density.

Treatment
cover crop residuese0
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
weed biomass or densitye0
Direction
no significant effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“cover crop residues had no significant effect on weed biomass or density due to a high degree of spatial variability present in the weed populations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 586–734 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn (Zea mays)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–66 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Interseeded cover crops did not reduce corn grain yield versus bare ground.

Treatment
inter-seeded cover cropse0
Outcome
Corn grain yieldse0
Direction
not reducede0
Comparator
bare ground control treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Corn grain yields were not reduced by the presence of inter-seeded cover crops when compared with the bare ground control treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 736–867 · show in text ↑

organic · weed · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

21 papers: 17 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

17 papers more in this group

See all 21 papers →

cover crop · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

222 papers: 104 positive, 118 negative or no effect

117 papers in the same direction as this paper · 104 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

218 papers more in this group

See all 222 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.