Paper · 2018 · Journal of Food Processing and Preservation

Effect of pulsed light, edible coating, and dipping on the phenolic profile and antioxidant potential of fresh-cut mango

B. Salinas-Roca; R. Soliva-Fortuny; J. Welti-Chanes; et al.

12
claims
19
verbatim quotes
26
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

This work aimed at evaluating the individual or combined effect of pulsed light (PL) treatment, alginate (AL) coating, and malic acid (MA) dip on antioxidant capacity, phenolic compounds content, and color of untreated or treated fresh-cut mango throughout 14 days. PL–AL–MA and AL–MA–PL treatments prevented browning of fresh-cut mango over the storage. Those treatment combinations resulted into the greatest radical scavenging activity (RSA), which was 42.2% RSAABTS in fresh-cut mango at day 14. Total phenolic compounds in fresh-cut mango subjected to AL, AL–MA–PL, and PL–AL–MA treatments showed maximal concentration of 1,664.46, 1,367.58, and 1,745.71 mg GAE/kg, respectively, at day 3, when the concentration began to decline until day 7. Although five individual phenolics (gallic acid, dihydroxybenzoic acid, chlorogenic acid, mangiferin, and quercetin) were initially identified, only gallic acid, mangiferin, and quercetin were maintained in treated fresh-cut mango during entire storage. MA and AL–MA–PL treatments might enhance mangiferin content by inducing a stress response in fresh-cut mango for 14 days. Practical applications The present article leads with novel food processing systems able to preserve bioactive compounds of fresh-cut fruit throughout storage. It is worth to mention that this research would enable the commercialization of high nutritive fruits such as mango in nonproducing countries.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PL–AL–MA prevented browning during storage.

Treatment
PL–AL–MAe0
Outcome
browninge0
Direction
preventede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“PL–AL–MA and AL–MA–PL treatments prevented browning of fresh-cut mango over the storage.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 266–354 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AL–MA–PL prevented browning during storage.

Treatment
AL–MA–PLe0
Outcome
browninge0
Direction
preventede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“PL–AL–MA and AL–MA–PL treatments prevented browning of fresh-cut mango over the storage.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 266–354 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Treatment PL–AL–MA yielded the greatest radical scavenging activity of 42.2% at day 14.

Treatment
PL–AL–MAe1
Outcome
radical scavenging activity (RSA)e0
Direction
greateste0
Value
42.2% RSAABTSe0
Qualifier
day 14e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Those treatment combinations resulted into the greatest radical scavenging activity (RSA), which was 42.2% RSAABTS in fresh-cut mango at day 14.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 355–499 · show in text ↑
e1

“PL–AL–MA and AL–MA–PL treatments prevented browning of fresh-cut mango over the storage.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 266–354 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Treatment AL–MA–PL yielded the greatest radical scavenging activity of 42.2% at day 14.

Treatment
AL–MA–PLe1
Outcome
radical scavenging activity (RSA)e0
Direction
greateste0
Value
42.2% RSAABTSe0
Qualifier
day 14e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Those treatment combinations resulted into the greatest radical scavenging activity (RSA), which was 42.2% RSAABTS in fresh-cut mango at day 14.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 355–499 · show in text ↑
e1

“PL–AL–MA and AL–MA–PL treatments prevented browning of fresh-cut mango over the storage.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 266–354 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Treatment AL gave maximum total phenolic concentration of 1,664.46 at day 3.

Treatment
ALe0
Outcome
Total phenolic compoundse0
Direction
maximale0
Value
1,664.46e0
Qualifier
day 3e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Total phenolic compounds in fresh-cut mango subjected to AL, AL–MA–PL, and PL–AL–MA treatments showed maximal concentration of 1,664.46, 1,367.58, and 1,745.71 mg GAE/kg, respectively, at day 3”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 500–693 · show in text ↑
e1

“PL–AL–MA and AL–MA–PL treatments prevented browning of fresh-cut mango over the storage.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 266–354 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Treatment AL–MA–PL gave maximum total phenolic concentration of 1,367.58 at day 3.

Treatment
AL–MA–PLe0
Outcome
Total phenolic compoundse0
Direction
maximale0
Value
1,367.58e0
Qualifier
day 3e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Total phenolic compounds in fresh-cut mango subjected to AL, AL–MA–PL, and PL–AL–MA treatments showed maximal concentration of 1,664.46, 1,367.58, and 1,745.71 mg GAE/kg, respectively, at day 3”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 500–693 · show in text ↑
e1

“PL–AL–MA and AL–MA–PL treatments prevented browning of fresh-cut mango over the storage.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 266–354 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Treatment PL–AL–MA gave maximum total phenolic concentration of 1,745.71 mg GAE/kg at day 3.

Treatment
PL–AL–MAe0
Outcome
Total phenolic compoundse0
Direction
maximale0
Value
1,745.71 mg GAE/kge0
Qualifier
day 3e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Total phenolic compounds in fresh-cut mango subjected to AL, AL–MA–PL, and PL–AL–MA treatments showed maximal concentration of 1,664.46, 1,367.58, and 1,745.71 mg GAE/kg, respectively, at day 3”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 500–693 · show in text ↑
e1

“PL–AL–MA and AL–MA–PL treatments prevented browning of fresh-cut mango over the storage.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 266–354 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Total phenolic concentration declined until day 7.

Outcome
Total phenolic compoundse1
Direction
declinee0
Qualifier
day 7e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“when the concentration began to decline until day 7”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 695–746 · show in text ↑
e1

“Total phenolic compounds in fresh-cut mango subjected to AL, AL–MA–PL, and PL–AL–MA treatments showed maximal concentration”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 500–623 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Five individual phenolics were initially identified.

Outcome
gallic acid, dihydroxybenzoic acid, chlorogenic acid, mangiferin, and quercetine0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“five individual phenolics (gallic acid, dihydroxybenzoic acid, chlorogenic acid, mangiferin, and quercetin) were initially identified”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 757–890 · show in text ↑
t0

“mango”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 115–120 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Gallic acid, mangiferin, and quercetin persisted throughout storage.

Outcome
gallic acid, mangiferin, and quercetine0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“only gallic acid, mangiferin, and quercetin were maintained in treated fresh-cut mango during entire storage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 892–1000 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

MA might enhance mangiferin content by inducing a stress response.

Treatment
MAe0
Outcome
mangiferin contente0
Direction
enhancee0
Qualifier
inducing a stress responsee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“MA and AL–MA–PL treatments might enhance mangiferin content by inducing a stress response in fresh-cut mango for 14 days”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1002–1122 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AL–MA–PL might enhance mangiferin content by inducing a stress response.

Treatment
AL–MA–PLe0
Outcome
mangiferin contente0
Direction
enhancee0
Qualifier
inducing a stress responsee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“MA and AL–MA–PL treatments might enhance mangiferin content by inducing a stress response in fresh-cut mango for 14 days”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1002–1122 · show in text ↑

alginate · quality: phytochemicals · Mangifera indica (mango)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.