Paper · 1986 · Weed Science

Persistence and Activity of Norflurazon and Fluridone in Five Georgia Soils Under Controlled Conditions

Jill Schroeder; Philip A. Banks

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
29
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Response of grain sorghum [ Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench. ‘BR 64’] to norflurazon [4-chloro-5-(methylamino)-2-(3-(trifluoromethyl)phenyl)-3(2 H )-pyridazinone] and fluridone {1-methyl-3-phenyl-5-[3-(trifluoromethyl) phenyl]-4(1 H )pyridinone} and the effect of previous treatment on the persistence of herbicide activity in five soils were determined in the greenhouse. Relative phytotoxicity of fluridone in the soils was ordered as Greenville sandy clay loam > Appling coarse sandy loam > Dothan loamy sand = Rome gravelly clay loam > Bradson clay loam. Phytotoxicity of norflurazon was ordered as Greenville = Appling = Dothan > Rome > Bradson. Fluridone was more phytotoxic than norflurazon. Field soil that has been previously treated with norflurazon or fluridone (500 days earlier at 1.7 kg ai/ha) still had low concentrations of each herbicide present at the time of retreatment in the greenhouse. Previous treatment of norflurazon did not affect the rate of decline in activity in any of the soils compared to previously nontreated soils except for Appling. Significantly higher concentrations of norflurazon remained in all previously treated soils 297 days after treatment (DAT) compared to previously nontreated soil. Residual carryover of norflurazon was greater in the Bradson soil (2.8% O.M.) than soils having less than 2% O.M. Fluridone dissipation was significantly faster in previously treated soil than in previously nontreated soil, indicating enhanced microbial degradation of the herbicide.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fluridone phytotoxicity differed among the five soils, ranking Greenville highest and Bradson lowest.

Taxon
grain sorghumSorghum bicolore1
Material
BR 64e1
Treatment
fluridonee0
Outcome
phytotoxicity of fluridonee0
Direction
>e0
Setting
Greenville sandy clay loame0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Relative phytotoxicity of fluridone in the soils was ordered as Greenville sandy clay loam > Appling coarse sandy loam > Dothan loamy sand = Rome gravelly clay loam > Bradson clay loam”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 369–553 · show in text ↑
e1

“grain sorghum [ Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench. ‘BR 64’]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 12–65 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Norflurazon phytotoxicity ranked Greenville, Appling and Dothan above Rome and Bradson.

Taxon
grain sorghumSorghum bicolore1
Treatment
norflurazone0
Outcome
Phytotoxicity of norflurazone0
Direction
>e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Phytotoxicity of norflurazon was ordered as Greenville = Appling = Dothan > Rome > Bradson”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 555–645 · show in text ↑
e1

“grain sorghum [ Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench. ‘BR 64’]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 12–65 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fluridone was more phytotoxic to grain sorghum than norflurazon.

Taxon
grain sorghumSorghum bicolore1
Treatment
Fluridonee0
Outcome
phytotoxice0
Direction
moree0
Comparator
norflurazone0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fluridone was more phytotoxic than norflurazon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 647–693 · show in text ↑
e1

“grain sorghum [ Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench. ‘BR 64’]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 12–65 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Previously treated field soil retained low concentrations of each herbicide at greenhouse retreatment.

Taxon
grain sorghumSorghum bicolore1
Outcome
low concentrations of each herbicidee0
Qualifier
500 days earlier at 1.7 kg ai/hae0
Setting
greenhousee0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Field soil that has been previously treated with norflurazon or fluridone (500 days earlier at 1.7 kg ai/ha) still had low concentrations of each herbicide present at the time of retreatment in the greenhouse”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 695–903 · show in text ↑
e1

“grain sorghum [ Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench. ‘BR 64’]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 12–65 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Previous norflurazon treatment did not affect decline in activity except in Appling soil.

Taxon
grain sorghumSorghum bicolore1
Treatment
Previous treatment of norflurazone0
Outcome
rate of decline in activitye0
Direction
did not affecte0
Qualifier
except for Applinge0
Comparator
previously nontreated soilse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Previous treatment of norflurazon did not affect the rate of decline in activity in any of the soils compared to previously nontreated soils except for Appling”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 905–1064 · show in text ↑
e1

“grain sorghum [ Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench. ‘BR 64’]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 12–65 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

More norflurazon remained at 297 days in previously treated than untreated soils.

Taxon
grain sorghumSorghum bicolore1
Treatment
previously treated soilse0
Outcome
concentrations of norflurazone0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
297 days after treatment (DAT)e0
Comparator
previously nontreated soile0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Significantly higher concentrations of norflurazon remained in all previously treated soils 297 days after treatment (DAT) compared to previously nontreated soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1066–1227 · show in text ↑
e1

“grain sorghum [ Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench. ‘BR 64’]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 12–65 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Norflurazon carryover was greater in Bradson soil than in soils below 2% organic matter.

Taxon
grain sorghumSorghum bicolore1
Outcome
Residual carryover of norflurazone0
Direction
greatere0
Qualifier
2.8% O.M.e0
Comparator
soils having less than 2% O.M.e0
Setting
Bradson soile0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Residual carryover of norflurazon was greater in the Bradson soil (2.8% O.M.) than soils having less than 2% O.M.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1229–1342 · show in text ↑
e1

“grain sorghum [ Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench. ‘BR 64’]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 12–65 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fluridone dissipated faster in previously treated than untreated soil.

Taxon
grain sorghumSorghum bicolore1
Treatment
previously treated soile0
Outcome
Fluridone dissipatione0
Direction
fastere0
Comparator
previously nontreated soile0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fluridone dissipation was significantly faster in previously treated soil than in previously nontreated soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1343–1451 · show in text ↑
e1

“grain sorghum [ Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench. ‘BR 64’]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 12–65 · show in text ↑

Fluridone · crop injury · Sorghum bicolor (sorghum)Results agree

3 papers: 0 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
  2. negative
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.