Paper · 2017 · Zbornik Matice srpske za prirodne nauke

Effect of nozzle type on the fungicide efficacy for fusarium head blight suppression on wheat

Ildiko Sterbik; Ferenc Bagi; Aleksandar Sedlar; et al.

3
claims
5
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Effect of fungicide treatments on Fusarium head blight (FHB) and grain yield of wheat depending on application technique i.e. use of different nozzle types, was evaluated in the study. Nozzles types TJ 11004, Albuz ATR 8004 and Arag TFA 11004 were used for application of systemic fungicide Duett Ultra (0.5 l/ha). FHB intensity (%) was determined on the basis of a visual assessment of the number of infected heads and the perecentage of the disease symptoms on the individual head. Differences in grain yield between the treated variants, as well as between the treated and untreated variants, were determined after hand threshing. The lowest percentage of FHB development in wheat and the highest yield were recorded in variants where fungicides were applied by nozzle type ATR 8004. Application technique directly affects the reduction of fusarium head blight in wheat and indirectly it also reduces yield loss.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ATR 8004 fungicide application had the lowest FHB development in wheat.

Treatment
fungicides were applied by nozzle type ATR 8004e0
Outcome
FHB developmente0
Direction
loweste0
Comparator
TJ 11004, Albuz ATR 8004 and Arag TFA 11004e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The lowest percentage of FHB development in wheat and the highest yield were recorded in variants where fungicides were applied by nozzle type ATR 8004.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 634–786 · show in text ↑
e1

“Nozzles types TJ 11004, Albuz ATR 8004 and Arag TFA 11004”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 185–242 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ATR 8004 fungicide application had the highest yield in wheat.

Treatment
fungicides were applied by nozzle type ATR 8004e0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
TJ 11004, Albuz ATR 8004 and Arag TFA 11004e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The lowest percentage of FHB development in wheat and the highest yield were recorded in variants where fungicides were applied by nozzle type ATR 8004.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 634–786 · show in text ↑
e1

“Nozzles types TJ 11004, Albuz ATR 8004 and Arag TFA 11004”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 185–242 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Application technique reduced Fusarium head blight and indirectly reduced yield loss.

Treatment
Application techniquee0
Interactor
fusariumFusariume0pathogen
Outcome
yield losse0
Qualifier
reduction of fusarium head blighte0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium
Fusarium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application technique directly affects the reduction of fusarium head blight in wheat and indirectly it also reduces yield loss.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 787–915 · show in text ↑

fungicide · disease · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

157 papers: 135 positive, 22 negative or no effect

134 papers in the same direction as this paper · 19 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

153 papers more in this group

See all 157 papers →

fungicide · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

262 papers: 232 positive, 30 negative or no effect

231 papers in the same direction as this paper · 30 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

258 papers more in this group

See all 262 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.