Paper · 2017 · PeerJ

The effects of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and root interaction on the competition between Trifolium repens and Lolium perenne

Haiyan Ren; Tao Gao; Jian Hu; et al.

8
claims
21
verbatim quotes
25
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Understanding the factors that alter competitive interactions and coexistence between plants is a key issue in ecological research. A pot experiment was conducted to test the effects of root interaction and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) inoculation on the interspecies competition between Trifolium repens and Lolium perenne under different proportions of mixed sowing by the combination treatment of two levels of AMF inoculation (inoculation and non-inoculation) and two levels of root interaction (root interaction and non-root interaction). Overall, the aboveground and belowground biomass of T. repens and L. perenne were not altered by AMF inoculation across planting ratios, probably because the fertile soil reduced the positive effect of AMF on plant growth. Both inter- and intraspecies root interaction significantly decreased the aboveground biomass of T. repens , but tended to increase the aboveground biomass of L. perenne across planting ratios, and thus peaked at the 4:4 polyculture. These results showed that T. repens competed poorly with L. perenne because of inter and intraspecies root interaction. Our results indicate that interspecies root interaction regulates the competitive ability of grass L. perenne and legume T. repens in mixtures and further makes great contribution for overyielding. Furthermore, AMF may not be involved in plant–plant interaction in fertile condition.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AMF inoculation did not alter aboveground or belowground biomass of T. repens across planting ratios.

Taxon
Trifolium repensTrifolium repenst0
Treatment
AMF inoculatione0
Interactor
AMFe0symbiont
Outcome
aboveground and belowground biomasse0
Direction
not alterede0
Comparator
non-inoculatione1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trifolium repens
Trifolium repens · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the aboveground and belowground biomass of T. repens and L. perenne were not altered by AMF inoculation across planting ratios”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 559–685 · show in text ↑
e1

“inoculation and non-inoculation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 437–468 · show in text ↑
t0

“Trifolium repens”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–108 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AMF inoculation did not alter aboveground or belowground biomass of L. perenne across planting ratios.

Taxon
Lolium perenneLolium perennet0
Treatment
AMF inoculatione0
Interactor
AMFe0symbiont
Outcome
aboveground and belowground biomasse0
Direction
not alterede0
Comparator
non-inoculatione1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium perenne
Lolium perenne · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the aboveground and belowground biomass of T. repens and L. perenne were not altered by AMF inoculation across planting ratios”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 559–685 · show in text ↑
e1

“inoculation and non-inoculation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 437–468 · show in text ↑
t0

“Lolium perenne”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 113–127 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Inter- and intraspecies root interaction significantly decreased aboveground biomass of T. repens across planting ratios.

Taxon
Trifolium repensTrifolium repenst0
Treatment
inter- and intraspecies root interactione0
Interactor
Lolium perenneLolium perennet0other
Outcome
aboveground biomasse0
Direction
decreasede0
Comparator
non-root interactione1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trifolium repens
Trifolium repens · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Lolium perenne
Lolium perenne · InteractorRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Both inter- and intraspecies root interaction significantly decreased the aboveground biomass of T. repens”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 773–879 · show in text ↑
e1

“root interaction and non-root interaction”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 506–547 · show in text ↑
t0

“Trifolium repens and Lolium perenne”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–127 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inter- and intraspecies root interaction tended to increase aboveground biomass of L. perenne across planting ratios.

Taxon
Lolium perenneLolium perennet0
Treatment
inter- and intraspecies root interactione0
Interactor
Trifolium repensTrifolium repenst0other
Outcome
aboveground biomass of L. perennee0
Direction
increasee0
Comparator
non-root interactione1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium perenne
Lolium perenne · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Trifolium repens
Trifolium repens · InteractorIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Both inter- and intraspecies root interaction significantly decreased the aboveground biomass of T. repens , but tended to increase the aboveground biomass of L. perenne across planting ratios”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 773–965 · show in text ↑
e1

“root interaction and non-root interaction”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 506–547 · show in text ↑
t0

“Trifolium repens and Lolium perenne”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–127 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

L. perenne aboveground biomass peaked at the 4:4 polyculture.

Taxon
Lolium perenneLolium perennet0
Outcome
aboveground biomass of L. perennee1
Direction
peakede0
Qualifier
4:4 polyculturee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium perenne
Lolium perenne · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“and thus peaked at the 4:4 polyculture”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 967–1005 · show in text ↑
e1

“aboveground biomass of L. perenne”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 909–942 · show in text ↑
t0

“Lolium perenne”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 113–127 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors infer that T. repens competed poorly with L. perenne because of root interaction.

Taxon
Trifolium repensTrifolium repenst0
Interactor
Lolium perenneLolium perennet0other
Outcome
competed poorlye0
Qualifier
inter and intraspecies root interactione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trifolium repens
Trifolium repens · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Lolium perenne
Lolium perenne · InteractorRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“T. repens competed poorly with L. perenne because of inter and intraspecies root interaction”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1033–1125 · show in text ↑
t0

“Trifolium repens and Lolium perenne”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–127 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors infer that interspecies root interaction contributes to overyielding in mixtures.

Taxon
Trifolium repensTrifolium repenst0
Interactor
Lolium perenneLolium perennet0other
Outcome
overyieldinge0
Qualifier
interspecies root interactione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trifolium repens
Trifolium repens · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Lolium perenne
Lolium perenne · InteractorRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“interspecies root interaction regulates the competitive ability of grass L. perenne and legume T. repens in mixtures and further makes great contribution for overyielding”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1153–1323 · show in text ↑
t0

“Trifolium repens and Lolium perenne”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–127 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest AMF may not participate in plant interactions under fertile conditions.

Taxon
Trifolium repensTrifolium repenst0
Interactor
AMFe0symbiont
Outcome
plant–plant interactione0
Qualifier
in fertile conditione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trifolium repens
Trifolium repens · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“AMF may not be involved in plant–plant interaction in fertile condition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1338–1409 · show in text ↑
t0

“Trifolium repens and Lolium perenne”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–127 · show in text ↑

inoculation · growth · Trifolium repens (white clover)Results differ

36 papers: 31 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 31 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

32 papers more in this group

See all 36 papers →

mycorrhiza · growth · Lolium perenne (perennial ryegrass)Positive and negative results

15 papers: 12 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

inoculation · growth · Lolium perenne (perennial ryegrass)Positive and negative results

17 papers: 15 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

mycorrhiza · growth · Trifolium repens (white clover)Positive and negative results

22 papers: 20 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 20 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

18 papers more in this group

See all 22 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.