Paper · 2017 · Journal of Crop production and processing

Yield Potential and Drought Tolerance of Some Domestic and Foreign Varieties of Safflower in Three Regions of Iran

Fatemeh Ebrahimi; Mohammad Mahdi Majidi; Ahmad Arzani; et al.

15
claims
30
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc

Abstract

Although safflower is widely distributed in Iran, other diversity centers have also been reported in many Asian and European countries, especially arid regions of the world. In this research 15 domestic and 42 exotic safflower genotypes were evaluated for drought tolerance in three locations of Najafabad (Isfahan), Jiroft and Jopar (Kerman), using a lattice design at normal and drought stress conditions. Water stress was applied at budding stage and depletion of 85% of available soil water. Results showed that drought stress significantly decreased most of the traits, including seed yield (30.20%), oil yield (32.28%), oil content (3.54%), number of capitulums per plant (16.77%), number of seeds per capitulum (16.04%) and plant height (4.43%). Drought stress did not significantly affect number of seeds per capitulum in Najafabad and Jopar locations but significantly decreased it in Jiroft location, leading to a lower seed yield in Jiroft compared to two other locations. According to principle components analysis based on drought-tolerance/susceptibility indices, genotype number 29 (PI- 657800) originating from Egypt was identified as the most drought tolerant genotype across all three locations. Moreover, genotypes number 37 (PI- 657820) originating from Jordan, 31 (CART 64) originating from Slovakia and 4 (PI- 239707) originating from Turkey were the most drought tolerant genotypes in Najafabad, Jiroft and Jopar, respectively. Generally, domestic genotypes had high oil content (more than 30%). The exotic tolerant genotypes with high and sustainable yield in this germplasm can provide useful gene pool for breeding of domestic genotypes with desirable traits such as high oil content. Also, there is the possibility to find stable - yielding genotypes in this worldwide collection.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 15

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought stress significantly decreased seed yield by 30.20%.

Treatment
drought stresse0
Outcome
seed yielde0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
30.20%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carthamus tinctorius
Carthamus tinctorius · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Safflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–89 · show in text ↑
e0

“drought stress significantly decreased most of the traits, including seed yield (30.20%), oil yield (32.28%), oil content (3.54%), number of capitulums per plant (16.77%), number of seeds per capitulum (16.04%) and plant height (4.43%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 516–751 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought stress significantly decreased oil yield by 32.28%.

Treatment
drought stresse0
Outcome
oil yielde0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
32.28%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carthamus tinctorius
Carthamus tinctorius · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Safflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–89 · show in text ↑
e0

“drought stress significantly decreased most of the traits, including seed yield (30.20%), oil yield (32.28%), oil content (3.54%), number of capitulums per plant (16.77%), number of seeds per capitulum (16.04%) and plant height (4.43%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 516–751 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought stress significantly decreased oil content by 3.54%.

Treatment
drought stresse0
Outcome
oil contente0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
3.54%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carthamus tinctorius
Carthamus tinctorius · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Safflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–89 · show in text ↑
e0

“drought stress significantly decreased most of the traits, including seed yield (30.20%), oil yield (32.28%), oil content (3.54%), number of capitulums per plant (16.77%), number of seeds per capitulum (16.04%) and plant height (4.43%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 516–751 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought stress significantly decreased number of capitulums per plant by 16.77%.

Treatment
drought stresse0
Outcome
number of capitulums per plante0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
16.77%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carthamus tinctorius
Carthamus tinctorius · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Safflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–89 · show in text ↑
e0

“drought stress significantly decreased most of the traits, including seed yield (30.20%), oil yield (32.28%), oil content (3.54%), number of capitulums per plant (16.77%), number of seeds per capitulum (16.04%) and plant height (4.43%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 516–751 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought stress significantly decreased number of seeds per capitulum by 16.04%.

Treatment
drought stresse0
Outcome
number of seeds per capitulume0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
16.04%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carthamus tinctorius
Carthamus tinctorius · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Safflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–89 · show in text ↑
e0

“drought stress significantly decreased most of the traits, including seed yield (30.20%), oil yield (32.28%), oil content (3.54%), number of capitulums per plant (16.77%), number of seeds per capitulum (16.04%) and plant height (4.43%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 516–751 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought stress significantly decreased plant height by 4.43%.

Treatment
drought stresse0
Outcome
plant heighte0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
4.43%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carthamus tinctorius
Carthamus tinctorius · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Safflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–89 · show in text ↑
e0

“drought stress significantly decreased most of the traits, including seed yield (30.20%), oil yield (32.28%), oil content (3.54%), number of capitulums per plant (16.77%), number of seeds per capitulum (16.04%) and plant height (4.43%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 516–751 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought stress did not significantly affect seeds per capitulum in Najafabad and Jopar.

Treatment
Drought stresse0
Outcome
number of seeds per capitulume0
Direction
did not significantly affecte0
Setting
Najafabad and Jopare0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carthamus tinctorius
Carthamus tinctorius · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Safflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–89 · show in text ↑
e0

“Drought stress did not significantly affect number of seeds per capitulum in Najafabad and Jopar locations but significantly decreased it in Jiroft location, leading to a lower seed yield in Jiroft compared to two other locations.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 753–983 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought stress significantly reduced seeds per capitulum in Jiroft.

Treatment
Drought stresse0
Outcome
number of seeds per capitulume0
Direction
decreasede0
Setting
Jirofte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carthamus tinctorius
Carthamus tinctorius · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Safflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–89 · show in text ↑
e0

“Drought stress did not significantly affect number of seeds per capitulum in Najafabad and Jopar locations but significantly decreased it in Jiroft location, leading to a lower seed yield in Jiroft compared to two other locations.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 753–983 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed yield in Jiroft was lower than in the other two locations.

Outcome
seed yielde0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
two other locationse0
Setting
Jirofte0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carthamus tinctorius
Carthamus tinctorius · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Safflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–89 · show in text ↑
e0

“Drought stress did not significantly affect number of seeds per capitulum in Najafabad and Jopar locations but significantly decreased it in Jiroft location, leading to a lower seed yield in Jiroft compared to two other locations.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 753–983 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PI- 657800 was identified as the most drought tolerant genotype in across all three locations.

Material
PI- 657800e0
Outcome
most drought tolerant genotypee0
Setting
across all three locationse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carthamus tinctorius
Carthamus tinctorius · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Safflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–89 · show in text ↑
e0

“genotype number 29 (PI- 657800) originating from Egypt was identified as the most drought tolerant genotype across all three locations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1078–1212 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PI- 657820 was identified as the most drought tolerant genotype in Najafabad.

Material
PI- 657820e0
Outcome
most drought tolerant genotypee0
Setting
Najafabade0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carthamus tinctorius
Carthamus tinctorius · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Safflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–89 · show in text ↑
e0

“genotypes number 37 (PI- 657820) originating from Jordan, 31 (CART 64) originating from Slovakia and 4 (PI- 239707) originating from Turkey were the most drought tolerant genotypes in Najafabad, Jiroft and Jopar, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1224–1449 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CART 64 was identified as the most drought tolerant genotype in Jiroft.

Material
CART 64e0
Outcome
most drought tolerant genotypee0
Setting
Jirofte0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carthamus tinctorius
Carthamus tinctorius · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Safflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–89 · show in text ↑
e0

“genotypes number 37 (PI- 657820) originating from Jordan, 31 (CART 64) originating from Slovakia and 4 (PI- 239707) originating from Turkey were the most drought tolerant genotypes in Najafabad, Jiroft and Jopar, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1224–1449 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PI- 239707 was identified as the most drought tolerant genotype in Jopar.

Material
PI- 239707e0
Outcome
most drought tolerant genotypee0
Setting
Jopare0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carthamus tinctorius
Carthamus tinctorius · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Safflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–89 · show in text ↑
e0

“genotypes number 37 (PI- 657820) originating from Jordan, 31 (CART 64) originating from Slovakia and 4 (PI- 239707) originating from Turkey were the most drought tolerant genotypes in Najafabad, Jiroft and Jopar, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1224–1449 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Domestic genotypes had oil content above 30%.

Material
domestic genotypese0
Outcome
oil contente0
Direction
highe0
Value
more than 30%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carthamus tinctorius
Carthamus tinctorius · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Safflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–89 · show in text ↑
e0

“domestic genotypes had high oil content (more than 30%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1462–1517 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Exotic tolerant genotypes were recommended as a breeding gene pool for high yield and oil content.

Material
exotic tolerant genotypese0
Outcome
useful gene pool for breeding of domestic genotypese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carthamus tinctorius
Carthamus tinctorius · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Safflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–89 · show in text ↑
e0

“The exotic tolerant genotypes with high and sustainable yield in this germplasm can provide useful gene pool for breeding of domestic genotypes with desirable traits such as high oil content.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1519–1710 · show in text ↑

drought · quality: oil · Carthamus tinctorius (safflower)Results differ

18 papers: 2 positive, 16 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

drought · yield · Carthamus tinctorius (safflower)Results differ

30 papers: 7 positive, 23 negative or no effect

22 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

26 papers more in this group

See all 30 papers →

drought · growth · Carthamus tinctorius (safflower)Positive and negative results

22 papers: 1 positive, 21 negative or no effect

20 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

18 papers more in this group

See all 22 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.