Abstract
Abstract Safflower oil contains a large amount of unsaturated fatty acids, however, the composition of the oil may be affected by drought stress. This experiment determined the effect of three irrigation regimes (60, 75 and 90% soil moisture depletions of available water) on oil composition of safflower cultivars (Kuseh, PI and IL111). Amounts of oil and oil composition of the seeds were determined by gas chromatography (GC). The oil contents of IL111, PI and Kuseh cultivars were 30.73, 27.63 and 25.25%, respectively. The oil contents, palmitic, stearic, oleic and linoleic acid contents were reduced by about 13, 63, 60, 14 and 10% by drought, respectively. The stearic acid contents of PI, IL111 and Kuseh were reduced by 72, 61 and 37% and palmitic acid contents of the same cultivars were reduced by drought by 65, 53 and 51%, respectively. Whereas, the linoleic acid contents of Kuseh, PI and IL111 were reduced by only 10, 8 and 5% and oleic acid contents of the same cultivars were reduced by only 14, 13 and 14% under the drought stress, respectively. The results showed that although drought stress reduced the amount of oil and oil composition of safflower cultivars, the decrease was due to a dramatic reduction in saturated fatty acids contents. Thus, proper irrigation regimes may enhance safflower oil quality.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 20
Claim · model-written summary
IL111 seed oil content was 30.73%.
- Taxon
- Safflower
Carthamus tinctoriust0 - Material
- IL111e1
- Outcome
- oil contentse1
- Value
- 30.73e1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) Cultivars”
e1“The oil contents of IL111, PI and Kuseh cultivars were 30.73, 27.63 and 25.25%, respectively”
Claim · model-written summary
PI seed oil content was 27.63%.
- Taxon
- SafflowerCarthamus tinctoriust0
- Material
- PIe1
- Outcome
- oil contentse1
- Value
- 27.63e1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) Cultivars”
e1“The oil contents of IL111, PI and Kuseh cultivars were 30.73, 27.63 and 25.25%, respectively”
Claim · model-written summary
Kuseh seed oil content was 25.25%.
- Taxon
- SafflowerCarthamus tinctoriust0
- Material
- Kusehe1
- Outcome
- oil contentse1
- Value
- 25.25%e1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) Cultivars”
e1“The oil contents of IL111, PI and Kuseh cultivars were 30.73, 27.63 and 25.25%, respectively”
Claim · model-written summary
Drought reduced seed oil content by about 13%.
- Taxon
- SafflowerCarthamus tinctoriust0
- Treatment
- droughte2
- Outcome
- oil contentse2
- Direction
- reducede2
- Value
- 13e2
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) Cultivars”
e2“The oil contents, palmitic, stearic, oleic and linoleic acid contents were reduced by about 13, 63, 60, 14 and 10% by drought, respectively”
Claim · model-written summary
Drought reduced palmitic acid contents by about 63%.
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) Cultivars”
e2“The oil contents, palmitic, stearic, oleic and linoleic acid contents were reduced by about 13, 63, 60, 14 and 10% by drought, respectively”
Claim · model-written summary
Drought reduced stearic acid contents by about 60%.
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) Cultivars”
e2“The oil contents, palmitic, stearic, oleic and linoleic acid contents were reduced by about 13, 63, 60, 14 and 10% by drought, respectively”
Claim · model-written summary
Drought reduced oleic acid contents by about 14%.
- Taxon
- SafflowerCarthamus tinctoriust0
- Treatment
- droughte2
- Outcome
- oleic acid contentse2
- Direction
- reducede2
- Value
- 14e2
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) Cultivars”
e2“The oil contents, palmitic, stearic, oleic and linoleic acid contents were reduced by about 13, 63, 60, 14 and 10% by drought, respectively”
Claim · model-written summary
Drought reduced linoleic acid contents by about 10%.
- Taxon
- SafflowerCarthamus tinctoriust0
- Treatment
- droughte2
- Outcome
- linoleic acid contentse2
- Direction
- reducede2
- Value
- 10e2
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) Cultivars”
e2“The oil contents, palmitic, stearic, oleic and linoleic acid contents were reduced by about 13, 63, 60, 14 and 10% by drought, respectively”
Claim · model-written summary
Drought reduced stearic acid content of PI by 72%.
- Taxon
- SafflowerCarthamus tinctoriust0
- Material
- PIe3
- Treatment
- droughte2
- Outcome
- stearic acid contentse3
- Direction
- reducede3
- Value
- 72e3
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) Cultivars”
e2“The oil contents, palmitic, stearic, oleic and linoleic acid contents were reduced by about 13, 63, 60, 14 and 10% by drought, respectively”
e3“The stearic acid contents of PI, IL111 and Kuseh were reduced by 72, 61 and 37%”
Claim · model-written summary
Drought reduced stearic acid content of IL111 by 61%.
- Taxon
- SafflowerCarthamus tinctoriust0
- Material
- IL111e3
- Treatment
- droughte2
- Outcome
- stearic acid contentse3
- Direction
- reducede3
- Value
- 61e3
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) Cultivars”
e2“The oil contents, palmitic, stearic, oleic and linoleic acid contents were reduced by about 13, 63, 60, 14 and 10% by drought, respectively”
e3“The stearic acid contents of PI, IL111 and Kuseh were reduced by 72, 61 and 37%”
Claim · model-written summary
Drought reduced stearic acid content of Kuseh by 37%.
- Taxon
- SafflowerCarthamus tinctoriust0
- Material
- Kusehe3
- Treatment
- droughte2
- Outcome
- stearic acid contentse3
- Direction
- reducede3
- Value
- 37e3
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) Cultivars”
e2“The oil contents, palmitic, stearic, oleic and linoleic acid contents were reduced by about 13, 63, 60, 14 and 10% by drought, respectively”
e3“The stearic acid contents of PI, IL111 and Kuseh were reduced by 72, 61 and 37%”
Claim · model-written summary
Drought reduced palmitic acid content of PI by 65%.
- Taxon
- SafflowerCarthamus tinctoriust0
- Material
- PIe3
- Treatment
- droughte4
- Outcome
- palmitic acid contentse4
- Direction
- reducede4
- Value
- 65e4
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) Cultivars”
e3“The stearic acid contents of PI, IL111 and Kuseh were reduced by 72, 61 and 37%”
e4“palmitic acid contents of the same cultivars were reduced by drought by 65, 53 and 51%”
Claim · model-written summary
Drought reduced palmitic acid content of IL111 by 53%.
- Taxon
- SafflowerCarthamus tinctoriust0
- Material
- IL111e3
- Treatment
- droughte4
- Outcome
- palmitic acid contentse4
- Direction
- reducede4
- Value
- 53e4
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) Cultivars”
e3“The stearic acid contents of PI, IL111 and Kuseh were reduced by 72, 61 and 37%”
e4“palmitic acid contents of the same cultivars were reduced by drought by 65, 53 and 51%”
Claim · model-written summary
Drought reduced palmitic acid content of Kuseh by 51%.
- Taxon
- SafflowerCarthamus tinctoriust0
- Material
- Kusehe3
- Treatment
- droughte4
- Outcome
- palmitic acid contentse4
- Direction
- reducede4
- Value
- 51e4
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) Cultivars”
e3“The stearic acid contents of PI, IL111 and Kuseh were reduced by 72, 61 and 37%”
e4“palmitic acid contents of the same cultivars were reduced by drought by 65, 53 and 51%”
Claim · model-written summary
Drought reduced linoleic acid content of Kuseh by only 10%.
- Taxon
- SafflowerCarthamus tinctoriust0
- Material
- Kusehe5
- Treatment
- droughte2
- Outcome
- linoleic acid contentse5
- Direction
- reducede5
- Value
- 10e5
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) Cultivars”
e2“The oil contents, palmitic, stearic, oleic and linoleic acid contents were reduced by about 13, 63, 60, 14 and 10% by drought, respectively”
e5“the linoleic acid contents of Kuseh, PI and IL111 were reduced by only 10, 8 and 5%”
Claim · model-written summary
Drought reduced linoleic acid content of PI by only 8%.
- Taxon
- SafflowerCarthamus tinctoriust0
- Material
- PIe5
- Treatment
- droughte2
- Outcome
- linoleic acid contentse5
- Direction
- reducede5
- Value
- 8e5
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) Cultivars”
e2“The oil contents, palmitic, stearic, oleic and linoleic acid contents were reduced by about 13, 63, 60, 14 and 10% by drought, respectively”
e5“the linoleic acid contents of Kuseh, PI and IL111 were reduced by only 10, 8 and 5%”
Claim · model-written summary
Drought reduced linoleic acid content of IL111 by only 5%.
- Taxon
- SafflowerCarthamus tinctoriust0
- Material
- IL111e5
- Treatment
- droughte2
- Outcome
- linoleic acid contentse5
- Direction
- reducede5
- Value
- 5e5
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) Cultivars”
e2“The oil contents, palmitic, stearic, oleic and linoleic acid contents were reduced by about 13, 63, 60, 14 and 10% by drought, respectively”
e5“the linoleic acid contents of Kuseh, PI and IL111 were reduced by only 10, 8 and 5%”
Claim · model-written summary
Drought reduced oleic acid content of Kuseh by only 14%.
- Taxon
- SafflowerCarthamus tinctoriust0
- Material
- Kusehe5
- Treatment
- droughte2
- Outcome
- oleic acid contentse6
- Direction
- reducede6
- Value
- 14e6
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) Cultivars”
e2“The oil contents, palmitic, stearic, oleic and linoleic acid contents were reduced by about 13, 63, 60, 14 and 10% by drought, respectively”
e5“the linoleic acid contents of Kuseh, PI and IL111 were reduced by only 10, 8 and 5%”
e6“oleic acid contents of the same cultivars were reduced by only 14, 13 and 14%”
Claim · model-written summary
Drought reduced oleic acid content of PI by only 13%.
- Taxon
- SafflowerCarthamus tinctoriust0
- Material
- PIe5
- Treatment
- droughte2
- Outcome
- oleic acid contentse6
- Direction
- reducede6
- Value
- 13e6
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) Cultivars”
e2“The oil contents, palmitic, stearic, oleic and linoleic acid contents were reduced by about 13, 63, 60, 14 and 10% by drought, respectively”
e5“the linoleic acid contents of Kuseh, PI and IL111 were reduced by only 10, 8 and 5%”
e6“oleic acid contents of the same cultivars were reduced by only 14, 13 and 14%”
Claim · model-written summary
Drought reduced oleic acid content of IL111 by only 14%.
- Taxon
- SafflowerCarthamus tinctoriust0
- Material
- IL111e5
- Treatment
- droughte2
- Outcome
- oleic acid contentse6
- Direction
- reducede6
- Value
- 14e6
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) Cultivars”
e2“The oil contents, palmitic, stearic, oleic and linoleic acid contents were reduced by about 13, 63, 60, 14 and 10% by drought, respectively”
e5“the linoleic acid contents of Kuseh, PI and IL111 were reduced by only 10, 8 and 5%”
e6“oleic acid contents of the same cultivars were reduced by only 14, 13 and 14%”
The same questions in other papers
drought · quality: oil · Carthamus tinctorius (safflower)Results differ
15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- negative
14 papers more in this group
See all 18 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.