Abstract
Field experiments were conducted in 1986 and 1987 to determine the efficacy of various herbicides applied in the spring or fall for redvine population reductions. Spring applications of dicamba and picloram reduced redvine populations 4 mo after application. These treatments also reduced soybean density. A sequential spring followed by fall application of dicamba reduced redvine stem counts 32 to 45% the following year. Spring or spring followed by fall applications of clopyralid and hexazinone were not effective in reducing redvine populations. A fall application of clopyralid, dicamba, Dowco 433, glyphosate, or imazapyr reduced redvine regrowth 78 to 97% the following year. Dicamba at 2.2 kg ae ha -1 , 3.4 kg ae ha -1 glyphosate, and 0.28 kg ai ha -1 imazapyr increased soybean yield the following year because of reduced redvine competition and lack of herbicide injury. Redvine populations were unaffected by fall applications of fosamine, hexazinone, and picloram, or clomazone applied in the spring or in the fall followed by a sequential spring application. A sequential spring followed by fall treatment of 1.1 + 1.1 kg ha- 1 dicamba or 0.14 + 0.14 kg ae ha -1 clopyralid reduced trumpetcreeper population 49 to 58% the following year.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 10
Claim · model-written summary
Spring applications of dicamba and picloram reduced redvine populations 4 months after application.
- Taxon
- redvinee1
- Treatment
- Spring applications of dicamba and piclorame1
- Outcome
- redvine populationse1
- Direction
- reducede1
- Qualifier
- 4 mo after applicatione1
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e1“Spring applications of dicamba and picloram reduced redvine populations 4 mo after application. These treatments also reduced soybean density”
Claim · model-written summary
Spring applications of dicamba and picloram also reduced soybean density.
- Taxon
- soybean
Glycine maxe1 - Treatment
- Spring applications of dicamba and piclorame1
- Outcome
- soybean densitye1
- Direction
- reducede1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“Spring applications of dicamba and picloram reduced redvine populations 4 mo after application. These treatments also reduced soybean density”
Claim · model-written summary
A sequential spring then fall dicamba application reduced redvine stem counts by 32 to 45% the following year.
- Taxon
- redvinee2
- Treatment
- sequential spring followed by fall application of dicambae2
- Outcome
- redvine stem countse2
- Direction
- reducede2
- Value
- 32 to 45%e2
- Qualifier
- the following yeare2
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e2“A sequential spring followed by fall application of dicamba reduced redvine stem counts 32 to 45% the following year”
Claim · model-written summary
Spring or spring-then-fall clopyralid and hexazinone applications did not reduce redvine populations.
- Taxon
- redvinee3
- Treatment
- Spring or spring followed by fall applications of clopyralid and hexazinonee3
- Outcome
- redvine populationse3
- Direction
- no_changeinferrede3
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e3“Spring or spring followed by fall applications of clopyralid and hexazinone were not effective in reducing redvine populations”
Claim · model-written summary
Fall applications of clopyralid, dicamba, Dowco 433, glyphosate or imazapyr reduced redvine regrowth by 78 to 97% the following year.
- Taxon
- redvinee4
- Treatment
- A fall application of clopyralid, dicamba, Dowco 433, glyphosate, or imazapyre4
- Outcome
- redvine regrowthe4
- Direction
- reducede4
- Value
- 78 to 97%e4
- Qualifier
- the following yeare4
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e4“A fall application of clopyralid, dicamba, Dowco 433, glyphosate, or imazapyr reduced redvine regrowth 78 to 97% the following year”
Claim · model-written summary
Dicamba at 2.2 kg ae ha-1 increased soybean yield the following year.
- Taxon
- soybeanGlycine maxe5
- Treatment
- Dicamba at 2.2 kg ae ha -1e5
- Outcome
- soybean yielde5
- Direction
- increasede5
- Qualifier
- because of reduced redvine competition and lack of herbicide injurye5
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e5“Dicamba at 2.2 kg ae ha -1 , 3.4 kg ae ha -1 glyphosate, and 0.28 kg ai ha -1 imazapyr increased soybean yield the following year because of reduced redvine competition and lack of herbicide injury”
Claim · model-written summary
Glyphosate at 3.4 kg ae ha-1 increased soybean yield the following year.
- Taxon
- soybeanGlycine maxe5
- Treatment
- 3.4 kg ae ha -1 glyphosatee5
- Outcome
- soybean yielde5
- Direction
- increasede5
- Qualifier
- because of reduced redvine competition and lack of herbicide injurye5
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e5“Dicamba at 2.2 kg ae ha -1 , 3.4 kg ae ha -1 glyphosate, and 0.28 kg ai ha -1 imazapyr increased soybean yield the following year because of reduced redvine competition and lack of herbicide injury”
Claim · model-written summary
Imazapyr at 0.28 kg ai ha-1 increased soybean yield the following year.
- Taxon
- soybeanGlycine maxe5
- Treatment
- 0.28 kg ai ha -1 imazapyre5
- Outcome
- soybean yielde5
- Direction
- increasede5
- Qualifier
- because of reduced redvine competition and lack of herbicide injurye5
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e5“Dicamba at 2.2 kg ae ha -1 , 3.4 kg ae ha -1 glyphosate, and 0.28 kg ai ha -1 imazapyr increased soybean yield the following year because of reduced redvine competition and lack of herbicide injury”
Claim · model-written summary
Fall fosamine, hexazinone, picloram or clomazone applications did not change redvine populations.
- Taxon
- Redvinee6
- Treatment
- fall applications of fosamine, hexazinone, and picloram, or clomazonee6
- Outcome
- Redvine populationse6
- Direction
- no_changeinferrede6
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e6“Redvine populations were unaffected by fall applications of fosamine, hexazinone, and picloram, or clomazone applied in the spring or in the fall followed by a sequential spring application”
Claim · model-written summary
Sequential spring then fall dicamba or clopyralid treatment reduced trumpetcreeper population by 49 to 58% the following year.
- Taxon
- trumpetcreeper
Campsis radicanse7 - Treatment
- A sequential spring followed by fall treatment of 1.1 + 1.1 kg ha- 1 dicamba or 0.14 + 0.14 kg ae ha -1 clopyralide7
- Outcome
- trumpetcreeper populatione7
- Direction
- reducede7
- Value
- 49 to 58%e7
- Qualifier
- the following yeare7
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e7“A sequential spring followed by fall treatment of 1.1 + 1.1 kg ha- 1 dicamba or 0.14 + 0.14 kg ae ha -1 clopyralid reduced trumpetcreeper population 49 to 58% the following year”
The same questions in other papers
dicamba · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Results differ
10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 38 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- negative
- negative
45 papers more in this group
See all 49 papers →glyphosate · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Results differ
54 papers in the same direction as this paper · 57 in the opposite direction · 11 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- positive
- positive
119 papers more in this group
See all 123 papers →imazapyr · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results
2 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- no effect
- no effect
dicamba · organism · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results
4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
5 papers more in this group
See all 9 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.