Abstract
Groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) is an important oilseed crop in Indian continent. Groundnut is being infected by several fungal, bacterial and viral diseases but dry root rot caused by Macrophomina phaseolina (Tassi) Goid. is considered as the most devastating disease in all the groundnut growing areas of Rajasthan. Trichoderma viride, T. harzianum, T. atroviride, Pseudomonas fluorescens and Bacillus subtilis gave distinct antagonistic reactions, showing stunting of Macrophomina phaseolina colony and clear zone of inhibition between colonies of antagonist and the pathogen was developed. Maximum growth inhibition was recorded in Trichoderma viride followed by T. harzianum. Trichoderma viride and T. harzianum in combination as seed treatment and soil application were most effective in minimising the root rot incidence followed by T. viride in combination with Pseudomonas fluorescens
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 4
Claim · model-written summary
Trichoderma viride gave maximum growth inhibition of Macrophomina phaseolina.
- Taxon
- groundnut
Arachis hypogaeat0 - Interactor
- Trichoderma viride
Trichoderma viridee0biocontrol_agent - Outcome
- growth inhibitione0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“groundnut”
e0“Maximum growth inhibition was recorded in Trichoderma viride followed by T. harzianum”
Claim · model-written summary
T. harzianum ranked next for growth inhibition.
- Taxon
- groundnutArachis hypogaeat0
- Interactor
- T. harzianum
Trichoderma harzianume0biocontrol_agent - Outcome
- growth inhibitione0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“groundnut”
e0“Maximum growth inhibition was recorded in Trichoderma viride followed by T. harzianum”
Claim · model-written summary
Combined T. viride and T. harzianum seed and soil application minimized root rot incidence most effectively.
- Taxon
- groundnutArachis hypogaeat0
- Treatment
- Trichoderma viride and T. harzianum in combination as seed treatment and soil applicatione0
- Outcome
- root rot incidencee0
- Direction
- minimisinge0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“groundnut”
e0“Trichoderma viride and T. harzianum in combination as seed treatment and soil application were most effective in minimising the root rot incidence”
Claim · model-written summary
T. viride with Pseudomonas fluorescens ranked next for control of root rot.
- Taxon
- groundnutArachis hypogaeat0
- Outcome
- followed by T. viride in combination with Pseudomonas fluorescense0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“groundnut”
e0“followed by T. viride in combination with Pseudomonas fluorescens”
The same questions in other papers
Trichoderma viride · disease · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results agree
9 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
6 papers more in this group
See all 10 papers →Trichoderma harzianum · disease · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results agree
11 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
8 papers more in this group
See all 12 papers →seed treatment · disease · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results
40 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- no effect
40 papers more in this group
See all 44 papers →application · disease · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results
47 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- negative
- no effect
48 papers more in this group
See all 52 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.