Paper · 2017 · The Plant Pathology Journal

Identification and Characterization of Pathogenic and Endophytic Fungal Species Associated with Pokkah Boeng Disease of Sugarcane

Angelyn Hilton; Huanming Zhang; Wenying Yu; et al.

5
claims
8
verbatim quotes
28
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc

Abstract

Pokkah Boeng is a serious disease of sugarcane, which can lead to devastating yield losses in crop-producing regions, including southern China. However, there is still uncertainty about the causal agent of the disease. Our aim was to isolate and characterize the pathogen through morphological, physiological, and molecular analyses. We isolated sugarcane-colonizing fungi in Fujian, China. Isolated fungi were first assessed for their cell wall degrading enzyme capabilities, and five isolates were identified for further analysis. Internal transcribed spacer sequencing revealed that these five strains are Fusarium, Alternaria, Phoma, Phomopsis, and Epicoccum. The Fusarium isolate was further identified as F. verticillioides after Calmodulin and EF-1 gene sequencing and microscopic morphology study. Pathogenicity assay confirmed that F. verticillioides was directly responsible for disease on sugarcane. Co-inoculation of F. verticillioides with other isolated fungi did not lead to a significant difference in disease severity, refuting the idea that other cellulolytic fungi can increase disease severity as an endophyte. This is the first report characterizing pathogenic F. verticillioides on sugarcane in southern China.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ITS sequencing identified five sugarcane-colonizing isolates as Fusarium, Alternaria, Phoma, Phomopsis and Epicoccum.

Taxon
sugarcanee1
Outcome
five strainse2
Qualifier
Internal transcribed spacer sequencinge2
Setting
Fujian, Chinae1

Verbatim

e1

“We isolated sugarcane-colonizing fungi in Fujian, China”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 334–389 · show in text ↑
e2

“Internal transcribed spacer sequencing revealed that these five strains are Fusarium, Alternaria, Phoma, Phomopsis, and Epicoccum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 533–662 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The Fusarium isolate was identified as F. verticillioides by calmodulin and EF-1 gene sequencing and microscopic morphology.

Taxon
sugarcanee1
Interactor
F. verticillioidesFusarium verticillioidese3pathogen
Outcome
identified as F. verticillioidese3
Qualifier
after Calmodulin and EF-1 gene sequencing and microscopic morphology studye3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fusarium verticillioides
Fusarium verticillioides · InteractorPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“We isolated sugarcane-colonizing fungi in Fujian, China”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 334–389 · show in text ↑
e3

“The Fusarium isolate was further identified as F. verticillioides after Calmodulin and EF-1 gene sequencing and microscopic morphology study”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 664–804 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pathogenicity assay showed F. verticillioides was directly responsible for disease on sugarcane.

Taxon
sugarcanee4
Treatment
Pathogenicity assaye4
Interactor
F. verticillioidesFusarium verticillioidese4pathogen
Outcome
diseasee4

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fusarium verticillioides
Fusarium verticillioides · InteractorPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“Pathogenicity assay confirmed that F. verticillioides was directly responsible for disease on sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 806–909 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Co-inoculation of F. verticillioides with other isolated fungi did not significantly change disease severity, refuting that other cellulolytic fungi raise severity as endophytes.

Taxon
Sugarcanet0
Treatment
Co-inoculation of F. verticillioides with other isolated fungie5
Interactor
F. verticillioidesFusarium verticillioidese5pathogen
Outcome
disease severitye5
Direction
no_changeinferrede5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fusarium verticillioides
Fusarium verticillioides · InteractorPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“Co-inoculation of F. verticillioides with other isolated fungi did not lead to a significant difference in disease severity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 911–1034 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pokkah Boeng Disease of Sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–129 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

This is the first report of pathogenic F. verticillioides on sugarcane in southern China.

Taxon
sugarcanee6
Interactor
F. verticillioidesFusarium verticillioidese6pathogen
Outcome
first report characterizing pathogenic F. verticillioidese6
Setting
southern Chinae6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fusarium verticillioides
Fusarium verticillioides · InteractorPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e6

“This is the first report characterizing pathogenic F. verticillioides on sugarcane in southern China”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1131–1231 · show in text ↑

Fusarium verticillioides · disease · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. no effect
See all 2 papers →

inoculation · disease · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

18 papers: 10 positive, 8 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.