Abstract
The current emphasis on reducing herbicide applications has led to an increase in alternative weed control measures. Field experiment was conducted in the spring of 2014 to examine the effect of hilling-time and reduced-rates of metribuzin and their combinations on weed infestation in potato, and to determine their impact on potato yield. Metribuzin at 0.35, 0.56, or 0.75 kg ai/ha with or without hilling 6, 7, and 8 weeks after planting (WAP) were used. Weed count, weed control visual rating, weed dry weight, potato plant height, number of shoots and leaves, root dry weight, and potato yield were collected. Results showed that metribuzin, at all tested rates, with or without hilling significantly reduced weed infestation after 50, 70, and 110 days after planting (DAP) compared to the check. Best results were obtained by a combination of metribuzin at all tested rates with hilling 6, 7, and 8 WAP. The results suggest that long season weed control and high marketable yield could be achieved by metribuzin at 0.35 kg ai/ha (53% reduction in metribuzin) supplemented with hilling (6 WAP). None of the treatments was toxic to potato plants compared to the hand-weeded plots.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 4
Claim · model-written summary
Metribuzin at all tested rates, with or without hilling, significantly reduced potato weed infestation against the check at 50, 70, and 110 days.
- Taxon
- Potato
Solanum tuberosumt0 - Treatment
- metribuzin, at all tested rates, with or without hillinge0
- Interactor
- weede0weed
- Outcome
- weed infestatione0
- Direction
- reducede0
- Comparator
- the checke0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“Potato”
e0“metribuzin, at all tested rates, with or without hilling significantly reduced weed infestation after 50, 70, and 110 days after planting (DAP) compared to the check”
Claim · model-written summary
Metribuzin plus hilling at 6, 7, and 8 weeks gave the best weed-control results.
- Taxon
- Potato
Solanum tuberosumt0 - Treatment
- combination of metribuzin at all tested rates with hilling 6, 7, and 8 WAPe0
- Outcome
- Best resultse0
- Direction
- Beste0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“Potato”
e0“Best results were obtained by a combination of metribuzin at all tested rates with hilling 6, 7, and 8 WAP”
Claim · model-written summary
The authors propose 0.35 kg ai/ha metribuzin plus hilling at 6 weeks for long-season control and high marketable yield.
- Taxon
- Potato
Solanum tuberosumt0 - Treatment
- metribuzin at 0.35 kg ai/hae0
- Outcome
- long season weed control and high marketable yielde0
- Value
- 53%e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“Potato”
e0“long season weed control and high marketable yield could be achieved by metribuzin at 0.35 kg ai/ha (53% reduction in metribuzin) supplemented with hilling (6 WAP)”
Claim · model-written summary
Treatments caused no observed potato toxicity compared with hand weeded plots.
- Taxon
- Potato
Solanum tuberosumt0 - Treatment
- the treatmentse0
- Outcome
- toxic to potato plantse0
- Comparator
- the hand-weeded plotse0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“Potato”
e0“None of the treatments was toxic to potato plants compared to the hand-weeded plots”
The same questions in other papers
metribuzin · weed · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Positive and negative results
20 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
18 papers more in this group
See all 22 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.