Paper · 2017 · International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences

Nutrient Management Practices for Organic Cultivation of Finger Millet (Eleusinecoracana L.) Under Southern Transitional Zone of Karnataka, India

T. Basavaraj Naik; A.H. Kumar Naik; K.P. Suresh Naik

12
claims
24
verbatim quotes
7
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-sa

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted during kharif season of 2014at Agricultural and Horticultural Research Station, Bhavikere, University of Agricultural and Horticultural Sciences, Shivamogga for nutrient management practices for organic cultivation of finger millet (Eleusinecoracana L.) under southern transitional zone of Karnataka. Among the different treatments, application of farmyard manure (FYM) at 10 t ha-1 + Biodigester Liquid Manure Equivalent (BDLME with two splits) at 75 kg N ha-1 recorded significantly higher grain yield (18.36 q/ha), straw yield (34.88 q/ha) and harvest index (0.46) with higher growth and yield attributing characters like plant height (132.2 cm), number of leaves per plant (20.00) and number of tillers per hill (5.4), finger length (9.57 cm), 1000 grain weight (13.87 g) and panicle weight (12.22 g) and higher gross return gross return (Rs. 34233 ha-1), net returns (Rs.24793 ha-1) and benefit cost ratio (2.63) compared to application of FYM at 5 t ha-1 + BDLME(Two splits) at 25 kg N ha-1 recorded significantly lower grain yield (10.37 q ha-1), straw yield (19.71 q ha-1) and harvest index (0.41)due to growth and yield attributing characters like plant height (120.3 cm), number of leaves per plant (11.80) and number of tillers per hill (3.5), finger length (6.05 cm), 1000 grain weight (16.93 g) and panicle weight (6.64 g) and higher gross return gross return (Rs. 21694 ha-1), net returns (Rs.12624 ha-1) and benefit cost ratio (1.39)compared to all other treatment combinations.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The higher manure regime produced higher grain yield (18.36 q/ha) than the lower regime.

Taxon
finger milletEleusine coracanae0
Treatment
application of farmyard manure (FYM) at 10 t ha-1 + Biodigester Liquid Manure Equivalent (BDLME with two splits) at 75 kg N ha-1e1
Outcome
grain yielde1
Direction
highere1
Value
18.36 q/hae1
Comparator
application of FYM at 5 t ha-1 + BDLME(Two splits) at 25 kg N ha-1e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eleusine coracana
Eleusine coracana · TaxonAgnieszka Kwiecień, Nova · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“finger millet (Eleusinecoracana L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 251–286 · show in text ↑
e1

“application of farmyard manure (FYM) at 10 t ha-1 + Biodigester Liquid Manure Equivalent (BDLME with two splits) at 75 kg N ha-1 recorded significantly higher grain yield (18.36 q/ha), straw yield (34.88 q/ha) and harvest index (0.46) with higher growth and yield attributing characters like plant height (132.2 cm), number of leaves per plant (20.00) and number of tillers per hill (5.4), finger length (9.57 cm), 1000 grain weight (13.87 g) and panicle weight (12.22 g) and higher gross return gross return (Rs. 34233 ha-1), net returns (Rs.24793 ha-1) and benefit cost ratio (2.63) compared to application of FYM at 5 t ha-1 + BDLME(Two splits) at 25 kg N ha-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 366–1029 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The higher manure regime produced higher straw yield (34.88 q/ha) than the lower regime.

Taxon
finger milletEleusine coracanae0
Treatment
application of farmyard manure (FYM) at 10 t ha-1 + Biodigester Liquid Manure Equivalent (BDLME with two splits) at 75 kg N ha-1e1
Outcome
straw yielde1
Direction
highere1
Value
34.88 q/hae1
Comparator
application of FYM at 5 t ha-1 + BDLME(Two splits) at 25 kg N ha-1e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eleusine coracana
Eleusine coracana · TaxonAgnieszka Kwiecień, Nova · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“finger millet (Eleusinecoracana L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 251–286 · show in text ↑
e1

“application of farmyard manure (FYM) at 10 t ha-1 + Biodigester Liquid Manure Equivalent (BDLME with two splits) at 75 kg N ha-1 recorded significantly higher grain yield (18.36 q/ha), straw yield (34.88 q/ha) and harvest index (0.46) with higher growth and yield attributing characters like plant height (132.2 cm), number of leaves per plant (20.00) and number of tillers per hill (5.4), finger length (9.57 cm), 1000 grain weight (13.87 g) and panicle weight (12.22 g) and higher gross return gross return (Rs. 34233 ha-1), net returns (Rs.24793 ha-1) and benefit cost ratio (2.63) compared to application of FYM at 5 t ha-1 + BDLME(Two splits) at 25 kg N ha-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 366–1029 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The higher manure regime produced higher harvest index (0.46) than the lower regime.

Taxon
finger milletEleusine coracanae0
Treatment
application of farmyard manure (FYM) at 10 t ha-1 + Biodigester Liquid Manure Equivalent (BDLME with two splits) at 75 kg N ha-1e1
Outcome
harvest indexe1
Direction
highere1
Value
0.46e1
Comparator
application of FYM at 5 t ha-1 + BDLME(Two splits) at 25 kg N ha-1e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eleusine coracana
Eleusine coracana · TaxonAgnieszka Kwiecień, Nova · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“finger millet (Eleusinecoracana L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 251–286 · show in text ↑
e1

“application of farmyard manure (FYM) at 10 t ha-1 + Biodigester Liquid Manure Equivalent (BDLME with two splits) at 75 kg N ha-1 recorded significantly higher grain yield (18.36 q/ha), straw yield (34.88 q/ha) and harvest index (0.46) with higher growth and yield attributing characters like plant height (132.2 cm), number of leaves per plant (20.00) and number of tillers per hill (5.4), finger length (9.57 cm), 1000 grain weight (13.87 g) and panicle weight (12.22 g) and higher gross return gross return (Rs. 34233 ha-1), net returns (Rs.24793 ha-1) and benefit cost ratio (2.63) compared to application of FYM at 5 t ha-1 + BDLME(Two splits) at 25 kg N ha-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 366–1029 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The higher manure regime produced higher plant height (132.2 cm) than the lower regime.

Taxon
finger milletEleusine coracanae0
Treatment
application of farmyard manure (FYM) at 10 t ha-1 + Biodigester Liquid Manure Equivalent (BDLME with two splits) at 75 kg N ha-1e1
Outcome
plant heighte1
Direction
highere1
Value
132.2 cme1
Comparator
application of FYM at 5 t ha-1 + BDLME(Two splits) at 25 kg N ha-1e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eleusine coracana
Eleusine coracana · TaxonAgnieszka Kwiecień, Nova · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“finger millet (Eleusinecoracana L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 251–286 · show in text ↑
e1

“application of farmyard manure (FYM) at 10 t ha-1 + Biodigester Liquid Manure Equivalent (BDLME with two splits) at 75 kg N ha-1 recorded significantly higher grain yield (18.36 q/ha), straw yield (34.88 q/ha) and harvest index (0.46) with higher growth and yield attributing characters like plant height (132.2 cm), number of leaves per plant (20.00) and number of tillers per hill (5.4), finger length (9.57 cm), 1000 grain weight (13.87 g) and panicle weight (12.22 g) and higher gross return gross return (Rs. 34233 ha-1), net returns (Rs.24793 ha-1) and benefit cost ratio (2.63) compared to application of FYM at 5 t ha-1 + BDLME(Two splits) at 25 kg N ha-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 366–1029 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The higher manure regime produced higher number of leaves per plant (20.00) than the lower regime.

Taxon
finger milletEleusine coracanae0
Treatment
application of farmyard manure (FYM) at 10 t ha-1 + Biodigester Liquid Manure Equivalent (BDLME with two splits) at 75 kg N ha-1e1
Outcome
number of leaves per plante1
Direction
highere1
Value
20.00e1
Comparator
application of FYM at 5 t ha-1 + BDLME(Two splits) at 25 kg N ha-1e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eleusine coracana
Eleusine coracana · TaxonAgnieszka Kwiecień, Nova · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“finger millet (Eleusinecoracana L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 251–286 · show in text ↑
e1

“application of farmyard manure (FYM) at 10 t ha-1 + Biodigester Liquid Manure Equivalent (BDLME with two splits) at 75 kg N ha-1 recorded significantly higher grain yield (18.36 q/ha), straw yield (34.88 q/ha) and harvest index (0.46) with higher growth and yield attributing characters like plant height (132.2 cm), number of leaves per plant (20.00) and number of tillers per hill (5.4), finger length (9.57 cm), 1000 grain weight (13.87 g) and panicle weight (12.22 g) and higher gross return gross return (Rs. 34233 ha-1), net returns (Rs.24793 ha-1) and benefit cost ratio (2.63) compared to application of FYM at 5 t ha-1 + BDLME(Two splits) at 25 kg N ha-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 366–1029 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The higher manure regime produced higher number of tillers per hill (5.4) than the lower regime.

Taxon
finger milletEleusine coracanae0
Treatment
application of farmyard manure (FYM) at 10 t ha-1 + Biodigester Liquid Manure Equivalent (BDLME with two splits) at 75 kg N ha-1e1
Outcome
number of tillers per hille1
Direction
highere1
Value
5.4e1
Comparator
application of FYM at 5 t ha-1 + BDLME(Two splits) at 25 kg N ha-1e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eleusine coracana
Eleusine coracana · TaxonAgnieszka Kwiecień, Nova · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“finger millet (Eleusinecoracana L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 251–286 · show in text ↑
e1

“application of farmyard manure (FYM) at 10 t ha-1 + Biodigester Liquid Manure Equivalent (BDLME with two splits) at 75 kg N ha-1 recorded significantly higher grain yield (18.36 q/ha), straw yield (34.88 q/ha) and harvest index (0.46) with higher growth and yield attributing characters like plant height (132.2 cm), number of leaves per plant (20.00) and number of tillers per hill (5.4), finger length (9.57 cm), 1000 grain weight (13.87 g) and panicle weight (12.22 g) and higher gross return gross return (Rs. 34233 ha-1), net returns (Rs.24793 ha-1) and benefit cost ratio (2.63) compared to application of FYM at 5 t ha-1 + BDLME(Two splits) at 25 kg N ha-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 366–1029 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The higher manure regime produced higher finger length (9.57 cm) than the lower regime.

Taxon
finger milletEleusine coracanae0
Treatment
application of farmyard manure (FYM) at 10 t ha-1 + Biodigester Liquid Manure Equivalent (BDLME with two splits) at 75 kg N ha-1e1
Outcome
finger lengthe1
Direction
highere1
Value
9.57 cme1
Comparator
application of FYM at 5 t ha-1 + BDLME(Two splits) at 25 kg N ha-1e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eleusine coracana
Eleusine coracana · TaxonAgnieszka Kwiecień, Nova · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“finger millet (Eleusinecoracana L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 251–286 · show in text ↑
e1

“application of farmyard manure (FYM) at 10 t ha-1 + Biodigester Liquid Manure Equivalent (BDLME with two splits) at 75 kg N ha-1 recorded significantly higher grain yield (18.36 q/ha), straw yield (34.88 q/ha) and harvest index (0.46) with higher growth and yield attributing characters like plant height (132.2 cm), number of leaves per plant (20.00) and number of tillers per hill (5.4), finger length (9.57 cm), 1000 grain weight (13.87 g) and panicle weight (12.22 g) and higher gross return gross return (Rs. 34233 ha-1), net returns (Rs.24793 ha-1) and benefit cost ratio (2.63) compared to application of FYM at 5 t ha-1 + BDLME(Two splits) at 25 kg N ha-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 366–1029 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The higher manure regime produced higher 1000 grain weight (13.87 g) than the lower regime.

Taxon
finger milletEleusine coracanae0
Treatment
application of farmyard manure (FYM) at 10 t ha-1 + Biodigester Liquid Manure Equivalent (BDLME with two splits) at 75 kg N ha-1e1
Outcome
1000 grain weighte1
Direction
highere1
Value
13.87 ge1
Comparator
application of FYM at 5 t ha-1 + BDLME(Two splits) at 25 kg N ha-1e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eleusine coracana
Eleusine coracana · TaxonAgnieszka Kwiecień, Nova · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“finger millet (Eleusinecoracana L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 251–286 · show in text ↑
e1

“application of farmyard manure (FYM) at 10 t ha-1 + Biodigester Liquid Manure Equivalent (BDLME with two splits) at 75 kg N ha-1 recorded significantly higher grain yield (18.36 q/ha), straw yield (34.88 q/ha) and harvest index (0.46) with higher growth and yield attributing characters like plant height (132.2 cm), number of leaves per plant (20.00) and number of tillers per hill (5.4), finger length (9.57 cm), 1000 grain weight (13.87 g) and panicle weight (12.22 g) and higher gross return gross return (Rs. 34233 ha-1), net returns (Rs.24793 ha-1) and benefit cost ratio (2.63) compared to application of FYM at 5 t ha-1 + BDLME(Two splits) at 25 kg N ha-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 366–1029 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The higher manure regime produced higher panicle weight (12.22 g) than the lower regime.

Taxon
finger milletEleusine coracanae0
Treatment
application of farmyard manure (FYM) at 10 t ha-1 + Biodigester Liquid Manure Equivalent (BDLME with two splits) at 75 kg N ha-1e1
Outcome
panicle weighte1
Direction
highere1
Value
12.22 ge1
Comparator
application of FYM at 5 t ha-1 + BDLME(Two splits) at 25 kg N ha-1e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eleusine coracana
Eleusine coracana · TaxonAgnieszka Kwiecień, Nova · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“finger millet (Eleusinecoracana L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 251–286 · show in text ↑
e1

“application of farmyard manure (FYM) at 10 t ha-1 + Biodigester Liquid Manure Equivalent (BDLME with two splits) at 75 kg N ha-1 recorded significantly higher grain yield (18.36 q/ha), straw yield (34.88 q/ha) and harvest index (0.46) with higher growth and yield attributing characters like plant height (132.2 cm), number of leaves per plant (20.00) and number of tillers per hill (5.4), finger length (9.57 cm), 1000 grain weight (13.87 g) and panicle weight (12.22 g) and higher gross return gross return (Rs. 34233 ha-1), net returns (Rs.24793 ha-1) and benefit cost ratio (2.63) compared to application of FYM at 5 t ha-1 + BDLME(Two splits) at 25 kg N ha-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 366–1029 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The higher manure regime produced higher gross return (Rs. 34233 ha-1) than the lower regime.

Taxon
finger milletEleusine coracanae0
Treatment
application of farmyard manure (FYM) at 10 t ha-1 + Biodigester Liquid Manure Equivalent (BDLME with two splits) at 75 kg N ha-1e1
Outcome
gross returne1
Direction
highere1
Value
Rs. 34233 ha-1e1
Comparator
application of FYM at 5 t ha-1 + BDLME(Two splits) at 25 kg N ha-1e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eleusine coracana
Eleusine coracana · TaxonAgnieszka Kwiecień, Nova · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“finger millet (Eleusinecoracana L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 251–286 · show in text ↑
e1

“application of farmyard manure (FYM) at 10 t ha-1 + Biodigester Liquid Manure Equivalent (BDLME with two splits) at 75 kg N ha-1 recorded significantly higher grain yield (18.36 q/ha), straw yield (34.88 q/ha) and harvest index (0.46) with higher growth and yield attributing characters like plant height (132.2 cm), number of leaves per plant (20.00) and number of tillers per hill (5.4), finger length (9.57 cm), 1000 grain weight (13.87 g) and panicle weight (12.22 g) and higher gross return gross return (Rs. 34233 ha-1), net returns (Rs.24793 ha-1) and benefit cost ratio (2.63) compared to application of FYM at 5 t ha-1 + BDLME(Two splits) at 25 kg N ha-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 366–1029 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The higher manure regime produced higher net returns (Rs.24793 ha-1) than the lower regime.

Taxon
finger milletEleusine coracanae0
Treatment
application of farmyard manure (FYM) at 10 t ha-1 + Biodigester Liquid Manure Equivalent (BDLME with two splits) at 75 kg N ha-1e1
Outcome
net returnse1
Direction
highere1
Value
Rs.24793 ha-1e1
Comparator
application of FYM at 5 t ha-1 + BDLME(Two splits) at 25 kg N ha-1e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eleusine coracana
Eleusine coracana · TaxonAgnieszka Kwiecień, Nova · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“finger millet (Eleusinecoracana L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 251–286 · show in text ↑
e1

“application of farmyard manure (FYM) at 10 t ha-1 + Biodigester Liquid Manure Equivalent (BDLME with two splits) at 75 kg N ha-1 recorded significantly higher grain yield (18.36 q/ha), straw yield (34.88 q/ha) and harvest index (0.46) with higher growth and yield attributing characters like plant height (132.2 cm), number of leaves per plant (20.00) and number of tillers per hill (5.4), finger length (9.57 cm), 1000 grain weight (13.87 g) and panicle weight (12.22 g) and higher gross return gross return (Rs. 34233 ha-1), net returns (Rs.24793 ha-1) and benefit cost ratio (2.63) compared to application of FYM at 5 t ha-1 + BDLME(Two splits) at 25 kg N ha-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 366–1029 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The higher manure regime produced higher benefit cost ratio (2.63) than the lower regime.

Taxon
finger milletEleusine coracanae0
Treatment
application of farmyard manure (FYM) at 10 t ha-1 + Biodigester Liquid Manure Equivalent (BDLME with two splits) at 75 kg N ha-1e1
Outcome
benefit cost ratioe1
Direction
highere1
Value
2.63e1
Comparator
application of FYM at 5 t ha-1 + BDLME(Two splits) at 25 kg N ha-1e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eleusine coracana
Eleusine coracana · TaxonAgnieszka Kwiecień, Nova · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“finger millet (Eleusinecoracana L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 251–286 · show in text ↑
e1

“application of farmyard manure (FYM) at 10 t ha-1 + Biodigester Liquid Manure Equivalent (BDLME with two splits) at 75 kg N ha-1 recorded significantly higher grain yield (18.36 q/ha), straw yield (34.88 q/ha) and harvest index (0.46) with higher growth and yield attributing characters like plant height (132.2 cm), number of leaves per plant (20.00) and number of tillers per hill (5.4), finger length (9.57 cm), 1000 grain weight (13.87 g) and panicle weight (12.22 g) and higher gross return gross return (Rs. 34233 ha-1), net returns (Rs.24793 ha-1) and benefit cost ratio (2.63) compared to application of FYM at 5 t ha-1 + BDLME(Two splits) at 25 kg N ha-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 366–1029 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · growth · Eleusine coracana (finger millet)Positive and negative results

17 papers: 16 positive, 1 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Eleusine coracana (finger millet)Positive and negative results

61 papers: 57 positive, 4 negative or no effect

56 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

57 papers more in this group

See all 61 papers →

fertilization · yield · Eleusine coracana (finger millet)Positive and negative results

174 papers: 171 positive, 3 negative or no effect

170 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

170 papers more in this group

See all 174 papers →

fertilization · growth · Eleusine coracana (finger millet)Results agree

40 papers: 40 positive, 0 negative or no effect

39 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

36 papers more in this group

See all 40 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.