Paper · 2017 · American Journal of Plant Sciences

Phytometric and Productive Characteristics of Safflower Submitted to Phosphate Fertilization in the Oxisol of the Brazilian Cerrado

Edna Maria Bonfim-Silva; Luiz Fernando Santos Miranda; Laura Cristina Rezende das Neves; et al.

6
claims
15
verbatim quotes
3
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.), in particular, has been soaring in significance as an alternative for oil and biodiesel production. In this context, the goal of this study was to assess the influence exerted by phosphate fertilization on the phytometric and productive characteristics of the safflower raised on the Oxisol of the Cerrado. The experiment was performed in a greenhouse, using pots of 3 dm-3 in volume. Adopting the completely randomized design, five doses of phosphorus (P2O5: 0, 90, 180, 360 and 540 mg·dm-3) and six replicates were included. The following variables were estimated, viz., number of leaves, plant height, and stem diameter, besides chlorophyll index (SPAD index), number of chapters and shoot dry matter. Barring the shoot dry matter and number of chapters, all the other variables were evaluated on days 30 and 45 after the plants were transplanted. Data were submitted to analysis of variance at 1%, 5% and 10% probabilities, and regression analysis, at 1% and 5% probabilities, respectively. All the variables revealed significant differences and adjustments to the linear regression model (P .76 for chlorophyll index, 5 units for the number of chapters and 3.45 g for dry shoot mass were recorded in response to the highest phosphorus dose in the experimental range (P2O5: 540 mg·dm-3). Phosphate fertilization was observed to affect the phytometric characteristics and boost the development of the safflower plants cultivated in the Cerrado Oxisol, substantiating that safflower could be a viable cash crop that can be established in the Brazilian Cerrado.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Phosphorus doses significantly affected leaf number, height and stem diameter, with linear regression fits.

Treatment
phosphoruse2
Outcome
number of leaves, plant height, and stem diametere0
Setting
greenhousee3

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carthamus tinctorius
Carthamus tinctorius · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“number of leaves, plant height, and stem diameter”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 614–663 · show in text ↑
e1

“All the variables revealed significant differences and adjustments to the linear regression model”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1036–1133 · show in text ↑
e2

“five doses of phosphorus (P2O5: 0, 90, 180, 360 and 540 mg·dm-3)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 469–533 · show in text ↑
t0

“Safflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–55 · show in text ↑
e3

“The experiment was performed in a greenhouse”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 348–392 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Phosphorus doses significantly affected chlorophyll index, chapter number and shoot dry matter, with linear regression fits.

Treatment
phosphoruse2
Outcome
chlorophyll index (SPAD index), number of chapters and shoot dry mattere0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carthamus tinctorius
Carthamus tinctorius · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“chlorophyll index (SPAD index), number of chapters and shoot dry matter”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 673–744 · show in text ↑
e1

“All the variables revealed significant differences and adjustments to the linear regression model”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1036–1133 · show in text ↑
e2

“five doses of phosphorus (P2O5: 0, 90, 180, 360 and 540 mg·dm-3)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 469–533 · show in text ↑
t0

“Safflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–55 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The highest phosphorus dose produced five chapters.

Treatment
P2O5: 540 mg·dm-3e0
Outcome
number of chapterse0
Value
5 unitse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carthamus tinctorius
Carthamus tinctorius · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“5 units for the number of chapters and 3.45 g for dry shoot mass were recorded in response to the highest phosphorus dose in the experimental range (P2O5: 540 mg·dm-3).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1164–1332 · show in text ↑
t0

“Safflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–55 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The highest phosphorus dose produced 3.45 g dry shoot mass.

Treatment
P2O5: 540 mg·dm-3e0
Outcome
dry shoot masse0
Value
3.45 ge0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carthamus tinctorius
Carthamus tinctorius · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“3.45 g for dry shoot mass were recorded in response to the highest phosphorus dose in the experimental range (P2O5: 540 mg·dm-3).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1203–1332 · show in text ↑
t0

“Safflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–55 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Phosphate fertilization boosted safflower development in Cerrado Oxisol.

Treatment
Phosphate fertilizatione0
Outcome
developmente0
Direction
booste0
Setting
Cerrado Oxisole0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carthamus tinctorius
Carthamus tinctorius · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Phosphate fertilization was observed to affect the phytometric characteristics and boost the development of the safflower plants cultivated in the Cerrado Oxisol”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1333–1494 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude safflower could be a viable cash crop in the Brazilian Cerrado.

Outcome
viable cash crope0
Setting
Brazilian Cerradoe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carthamus tinctorius
Carthamus tinctorius · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“safflower could be a viable cash crop that can be established in the Brazilian Cerrado.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1516–1603 · show in text ↑

phosphate · growth · Carthamus tinctorius (safflower)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
See all 2 papers →

fertilization · growth · Carthamus tinctorius (safflower)Positive and negative results

36 papers: 34 positive, 2 negative or no effect

33 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

32 papers more in this group

See all 36 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.