Paper · 2017 · Canadian Journal of Plant Science

Nutritive value of sweet pearl millet and sweet sorghum as influenced by N fertilization

Gilles Bélanger; Marie-Noëlle Thivierge; M. Chantigny; et al.

7
claims
7
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Increasing N fertilization decreased the in vitro digestibility of dry matter (IVTD) and neutral detergent fiber (NDF), but increased N concentration of sweet sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench] and sweet pearl millet [Pennisetum glaucum (L.) R.BR.] in eastern Canada. Sweet sorghum had lower NDF, acid detergent fiber, and N concentrations, and greater IVTD than sweet pearl millet.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing nitrogen fertilization decreased dry matter digestibility in sweet sorghum and sweet pearl millet.

Taxon
sweet sorghume0
Treatment
Increasing N fertilizatione0
Outcome
in vitro digestibility of dry matter (IVTD)e0
Direction
decreasede0
Setting
eastern Canadae0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Increasing N fertilization decreased the in vitro digestibility of dry matter (IVTD) and neutral detergent fiber (NDF), but increased N concentration of sweet sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench] and sweet pearl millet [Pennisetum glaucum (L.) R.BR.] in eastern Canada”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–269 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing nitrogen fertilization decreased neutral detergent fiber digestibility in sweet sorghum and sweet pearl millet.

Taxon
sweet pearl millete0
Treatment
Increasing N fertilizatione0
Outcome
neutral detergent fiber (NDF)e0
Direction
decreasede0
Setting
eastern Canadae0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Increasing N fertilization decreased the in vitro digestibility of dry matter (IVTD) and neutral detergent fiber (NDF), but increased N concentration of sweet sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench] and sweet pearl millet [Pennisetum glaucum (L.) R.BR.] in eastern Canada”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–269 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing nitrogen fertilization increased nitrogen concentration in both forages.

Taxon
sweet sorghume0
Treatment
Increasing N fertilizatione0
Outcome
N concentratione0
Direction
increasede0
Setting
eastern Canadae0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Increasing N fertilization decreased the in vitro digestibility of dry matter (IVTD) and neutral detergent fiber (NDF), but increased N concentration of sweet sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench] and sweet pearl millet [Pennisetum glaucum (L.) R.BR.] in eastern Canada”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–269 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sweet sorghum had lower neutral detergent fiber concentration than sweet pearl millet.

Taxon
Sweet sorghume0
Outcome
NDFe0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
sweet pearl millete0

Verbatim

e0

“Sweet sorghum had lower NDF, acid detergent fiber, and N concentrations, and greater IVTD than sweet pearl millet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 271–384 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sweet sorghum had lower acid detergent fiber concentration than sweet pearl millet.

Taxon
Sweet sorghume0
Outcome
acid detergent fibere0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
sweet pearl millete0

Verbatim

e0

“Sweet sorghum had lower NDF, acid detergent fiber, and N concentrations, and greater IVTD than sweet pearl millet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 271–384 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sweet sorghum had lower nitrogen concentration than sweet pearl millet.

Taxon
Sweet sorghume0
Outcome
N concentrationse0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
sweet pearl millete0

Verbatim

e0

“Sweet sorghum had lower NDF, acid detergent fiber, and N concentrations, and greater IVTD than sweet pearl millet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 271–384 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sweet sorghum had greater in vitro dry matter digestibility than sweet pearl millet.

Taxon
Sweet sorghume0
Outcome
IVTDe0
Direction
greatere0
Comparator
sweet pearl millete0

Verbatim

e0

“Sweet sorghum had lower NDF, acid detergent fiber, and N concentrations, and greater IVTD than sweet pearl millet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 271–384 · show in text ↑

fertilization · quality: grain · Cenchrus americanus (pearl millet)Positive and negative results

22 papers: 21 positive, 1 negative or no effect

21 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

18 papers more in this group

See all 22 papers →

fertilization · quality: grain · SorghumPositive and negative results

22 papers: 15 positive, 7 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

18 papers more in this group

See all 22 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · SorghumPositive and negative results

118 papers: 111 positive, 7 negative or no effect

110 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

114 papers more in this group

See all 118 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.