Paper · 2017 · Global Change Biology

Global climate change increases risk of crop yield losses and food insecurity in the tropical Andes

Richard Tito; Heraldo L. Vasconcelos; Kenneth J. Feeley

5
claims
10
verbatim quotes
156
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract One of the greatest current challenges to human society is ensuring adequate food production and security for a rapidly growing population under changing climatic conditions. Climate change, and specifically rising temperatures, will alter the suitability of areas for specific crops and cultivation systems. In order to maintain yields, farmers may be forced to change cultivation practices, the timing of cultivation, or even the type of crops grown. Alternatively, farmers can change the location where crops are cultivated (e.g., to higher elevations) to track suitable climates (in which case the plants will have to grow in different soils), as cultivated plants will otherwise have to tolerate warmer temperatures and possibly face novel enemies. We simulated these two last possible scenarios (for temperature increases of 1.3°C and 2.6°C) in the Peruvian Andes through a field experiment in which several traditionally grown varieties of potato and maize were planted at different elevations (and thus temperatures) using either the local soil or soil translocated from higher elevations. Maize production declined by 21%–29% in response to new soil conditions. The production of maize and potatoes declined by >87% when plants were grown under warmer temperatures, mainly as a result of the greater incidence of novel pests. Crop quality and value also declined under simulated migration and warming scenarios. We estimated that local farmers may experience severe economic losses of up to 2,300 US $ ha −1 yr −1 . These findings reveal that climate change is a real and imminent threat to agriculture and that there is a pressing need to develop effective management strategies to reduce yield losses and prevent food insecurity. Importantly, such strategies should take into account the influences of non‐climatic and/or biotic factors (e.g., novel pests) on plant development.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maize production declined by 21%–29% on translocated soils compared with local soil.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse2
Material
traditionally grown varietiese2
Treatment
new soil conditionse0
Outcome
Maize productione0
Direction
declinede0
Value
21%–29%e0
Comparator
local soile2
Setting
Peruvian Andese2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Maize production declined by 21%–29% in response to new soil conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1107–1178 · show in text ↑
e2

“in the Peruvian Andes through a field experiment in which several traditionally grown varieties of potato and maize were planted at different elevations (and thus temperatures) using either the local soil or soil translocated from higher elevations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 857–1105 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maize production declined by more than 87% under warmer temperatures, mainly because of novel pests.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse3
Treatment
warmer temperaturese3
Outcome
production of maizee3
Direction
declinede3
Value
>87%e3
Qualifier
mainly as a result of the greater incidence of novel pestse3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“in the Peruvian Andes through a field experiment in which several traditionally grown varieties of potato and maize were planted at different elevations (and thus temperatures) using either the local soil or soil translocated from higher elevations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 857–1105 · show in text ↑
e3

“The production of maize and potatoes declined by >87% when plants were grown under warmer temperatures, mainly as a result of the greater incidence of novel pests”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1180–1342 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Potato production declined by more than 87% under warmer temperatures, mainly because of novel pests.

Taxon
potatoesSolanum tuberosume3
Treatment
warmer temperaturese3
Outcome
productione3
Direction
declinede3
Value
>87%e3
Qualifier
mainly as a result of the greater incidence of novel pestse3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“in the Peruvian Andes through a field experiment in which several traditionally grown varieties of potato and maize were planted at different elevations (and thus temperatures) using either the local soil or soil translocated from higher elevations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 857–1105 · show in text ↑
e3

“The production of maize and potatoes declined by >87% when plants were grown under warmer temperatures, mainly as a result of the greater incidence of novel pests”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1180–1342 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Crop quality and value of potato and maize declined under simulated migration and warming scenarios.

Taxon
potato and maizeSolanum tuberosumZea mayse2
Treatment
simulated migration and warming scenariose4
Outcome
Crop quality and valuee4
Direction
declinede4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“in the Peruvian Andes through a field experiment in which several traditionally grown varieties of potato and maize were planted at different elevations (and thus temperatures) using either the local soil or soil translocated from higher elevations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 857–1105 · show in text ↑
e4

“Crop quality and value also declined under simulated migration and warming scenarios”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1344–1428 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativesimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Local farmers may face economic losses of up to 2,300 US$ per hectare per year from the simulated scenarios.

Taxon
potato and maizeSolanum tuberosumZea mayse2
Outcome
economic lossese5
Value
2,300 US $ ha −1 yr −1e5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“in the Peruvian Andes through a field experiment in which several traditionally grown varieties of potato and maize were planted at different elevations (and thus temperatures) using either the local soil or soil translocated from higher elevations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 857–1105 · show in text ↑
e5

“We estimated that local farmers may experience severe economic losses of up to 2,300 US $ ha −1 yr −1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1430–1531 · show in text ↑

heat · quality: general · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
See all 3 papers →

soil · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

25 papers: 19 positive, 6 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 19 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

21 papers more in this group

See all 25 papers →

heat · quality: general · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

6 papers: 0 positive, 6 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.