Paper · 2017 · Weed Technology

Sweetpotato Tolerance and Palmer Amaranth Control with Metribuzin and Oryzalin

Stephen L. Meyers; Katherine M. Jennings; David W. Monks

18
claims
34
verbatim quotes
9
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Field studies were conducted in Clinton, NC in 2007 and 2009 to determine sweetpotato crop response and Palmer amaranth control with metribuzin and oryzalin. Treatments consisted of 140 and 202 g ai ha −1 metribuzin applied immediately after transplanting [0 wk after transplanting (WAP)] or 2 WAP, 560 and 1121 g ha −1 oryzalin 0 WAP, and tank mixes of metribuzin (140 or 202 g ha −1 ) and oryzalin (560 or 1,121 g ha −1 ) 0 WAP. At 2 WAP, metribuzin alone applied 0 WAP resulted in greater crop injury (33%) than oryzalin alone (1%), and the tank mix of metribuzin plus oryzalin resulted in greater crop injury (49%) than either herbicide applied alone. Greater crop injury occurred when metribuzin was applied at 202 g ha −1 (54%) than 140 g ha −1 (34%). Levels of injury were similar at 4 WAP (34, 8, and 52% for metribuzin, oryzalin, and the tank mix, respectively). At 4 WAP, injury from metribuzin was greater when it was applied 0 WAP (34%) compared to 2 WAP (18%). By 10 WAP, injury from metribuzin applied at 2 WAP was only 4%. At 4 WAP, Palmer amaranth control was excellent for all treatments and ≥98%. At 10 WAP, control among treatments ranged from 77% to 85%. Palmer amaranth control provided by metribuzin was similar for applications made 0 WAP (78%) and 2 WAP (77%). Oryzalin alone provided similar control (85%) to metribuzin alone 0 WAP, but greater control than the tank mix (77%). Neither metribuzin nor oryzalin rate differed in weed control provided at 10 WAP. Oryzalin 0 WAP and metribuzin 2 WAP provided no. 1 sweetpotato yields equivalent to the hand-weeded check. No. 1 yields of all other treatments were less than the hand-weeded check but greater than the weedy check.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 18

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 2 WAP, metribuzin caused 33% injury versus 1% for oryzalin.

Taxon
SweetpotatoIpomoea batatast0
Treatment
metribuzin alone applied 0 WAPe0
Outcome
crop injurye0
Direction
greatere0
Value
33%e0
Qualifier
1%e0
Comparator
oryzalin alonee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“metribuzin alone applied 0 WAP resulted in greater crop injury (33%) than oryzalin alone (1%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 441–534 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sweetpotato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–11 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The metribuzin and oryzalin tank mix caused 49% injury, more than either alone.

Taxon
SweetpotatoIpomoea batatast0
Treatment
tank mix of metribuzin plus oryzaline0
Outcome
crop injurye0
Direction
greatere0
Value
49%e0
Comparator
either herbicide applied alonee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the tank mix of metribuzin plus oryzalin resulted in greater crop injury (49%) than either herbicide applied alone.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 540–655 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sweetpotato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–11 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 202 g rate of metribuzin caused 54% injury versus 34% at 140 g.

Taxon
SweetpotatoIpomoea batatast0
Treatment
metribuzin was applied at 202 g ha −1e0
Outcome
crop injurye0
Direction
Greatere0
Value
54%e0
Qualifier
34%e0
Comparator
140 g ha −1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Greater crop injury occurred when metribuzin was applied at 202 g ha −1 (54%) than 140 g ha −1 (34%).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 656–757 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sweetpotato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–11 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 4 WAP, metribuzin injury was 34%.

Taxon
SweetpotatoIpomoea batatast0
Treatment
metribuzine0
Outcome
injurye0
Value
34e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Levels of injury were similar at 4 WAP (34, 8, and 52% for metribuzin, oryzalin, and the tank mix, respectively).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 758–871 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sweetpotato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–11 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 4 WAP, oryzalin injury was 8%.

Taxon
SweetpotatoIpomoea batatast0
Treatment
oryzaline0
Outcome
injurye0
Value
8e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Levels of injury were similar at 4 WAP (34, 8, and 52% for metribuzin, oryzalin, and the tank mix, respectively).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 758–871 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sweetpotato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–11 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 4 WAP, tank-mix injury was 52%.

Taxon
SweetpotatoIpomoea batatast0
Treatment
the tank mixe0
Outcome
injurye0
Value
52%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Levels of injury were similar at 4 WAP (34, 8, and 52% for metribuzin, oryzalin, and the tank mix, respectively).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 758–871 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sweetpotato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–11 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Metribuzin at transplanting caused 34% injury versus 18% at 2 WAP.

Taxon
SweetpotatoIpomoea batatast0
Treatment
metribuzin was greater when it was applied 0 WAPe0
Outcome
injurye0
Direction
greatere0
Value
34%e0
Qualifier
18%e0
Comparator
2 WAPe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“injury from metribuzin was greater when it was applied 0 WAP (34%) compared to 2 WAP (18%).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 882–973 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sweetpotato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–11 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

By 10 WAP, injury from metribuzin applied at 2 WAP was 4%.

Taxon
SweetpotatoIpomoea batatast0
Treatment
metribuzin applied at 2 WAPe0
Outcome
injurye0
Value
4%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“By 10 WAP, injury from metribuzin applied at 2 WAP was only 4%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 974–1037 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sweetpotato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–11 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All treatments controlled Palmer amaranth by at least 98% at 4 WAP.

Taxon
SweetpotatoIpomoea batatast0
Interactor
Palmer amaranthe0weed
Outcome
Palmer amaranth controle0
Value
≥98%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At 4 WAP, Palmer amaranth control was excellent for all treatments and ≥98%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1038–1114 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sweetpotato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–11 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 10 WAP, treatment control of Palmer amaranth ranged from 77% to 85%.

Taxon
SweetpotatoIpomoea batatast0
Outcome
control among treatmentse0
Value
77% to 85%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At 10 WAP, control among treatments ranged from 77% to 85%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1115–1174 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sweetpotato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–11 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Metribuzin at 0 and 2 WAP gave similar Palmer amaranth control, 78% and 77%.

Taxon
SweetpotatoIpomoea batatast0
Treatment
metribuzine0
Interactor
Palmer amaranthe0weed
Outcome
Palmer amaranth controle0
Direction
similare0
Value
78%e0
Qualifier
77%e0
Comparator
2 WAPe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Palmer amaranth control provided by metribuzin was similar for applications made 0 WAP (78%) and 2 WAP (77%).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1175–1284 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sweetpotato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–11 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Oryzalin alone controlled Palmer amaranth similarly to metribuzin alone at transplanting.

Taxon
SweetpotatoIpomoea batatast0
Treatment
Oryzalin alonee0
Outcome
controle0
Direction
similare0
Value
85%e0
Comparator
metribuzin alone 0 WAPe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Oryzalin alone provided similar control (85%) to metribuzin alone 0 WAP”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1285–1356 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sweetpotato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–11 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Oryzalin alone gave greater control than the tank mix.

Taxon
SweetpotatoIpomoea batatast0
Treatment
Oryzalin alonee0
Outcome
controle0
Direction
greatere0
Value
77%e0
Comparator
tank mixe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Oryzalin alone provided similar control (85%) to metribuzin alone 0 WAP, but greater control than the tank mix (77%).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1285–1402 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sweetpotato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–11 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Neither metribuzin nor oryzalin rate differed in weed control at 10 WAP.

Taxon
SweetpotatoIpomoea batatast0
Treatment
metribuzin nor oryzalin ratee0
Outcome
weed controle0
Direction
differede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Neither metribuzin nor oryzalin rate differed in weed control provided at 10 WAP.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1403–1484 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sweetpotato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–11 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Oryzalin at 0 WAP produced no. 1 yields equivalent to hand weeding.

Taxon
sweetpotatoIpomoea batatase0
Treatment
Oryzalin 0 WAPe0
Outcome
no. 1 sweetpotato yieldse0
Direction
equivalente0
Comparator
hand-weeded checke0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Oryzalin 0 WAP and metribuzin 2 WAP provided no. 1 sweetpotato yields equivalent to the hand-weeded check.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1485–1591 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Metribuzin at 2 WAP produced no. 1 yields equivalent to hand weeding.

Taxon
sweetpotatoIpomoea batatase0
Treatment
metribuzin 2 WAPe0
Outcome
no. 1 sweetpotato yieldse0
Direction
equivalente0
Comparator
hand-weeded checke0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Oryzalin 0 WAP and metribuzin 2 WAP provided no. 1 sweetpotato yields equivalent to the hand-weeded check.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1485–1591 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All other treatments produced no. 1 yields below hand weeding.

Taxon
SweetpotatoIpomoea batatast0
Treatment
all other treatmentse0
Outcome
No. 1 yieldse0
Direction
less thane0
Comparator
hand-weeded checke0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“No. 1 yields of all other treatments were less than the hand-weeded check but greater than the weedy check.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1592–1699 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sweetpotato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–11 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All other treatments produced no. 1 yields above the weedy check.

Taxon
SweetpotatoIpomoea batatast0
Treatment
all other treatmentse0
Outcome
No. 1 yieldse0
Direction
greater thane0
Comparator
weedy checke0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“No. 1 yields of all other treatments were less than the hand-weeded check but greater than the weedy check.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1592–1699 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sweetpotato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–11 · show in text ↑

metribuzin · crop injury · Ipomoea batatas (sweet potato)Results agree

4 papers: 0 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect
See all 4 papers →

transplanting · crop injury · Ipomoea batatas (sweet potato)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 1 positive, 8 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.