Paper · 2017 · Journal of Agricultural Science

Beet Crop under Different Fertilization and Nitrogen Fertigation in Protected Environment

Vitoria E. Borges; Rigoberto M. Matos; Jailton G. Ramos; et al.

5
claims
11
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Chemical fertilizers have been increasingly used in agriculture. The application of these nutrients via irrigation water has been evaluated in order to obtain productive results in agricultural yield. The objective of this research was to evaluate the effect of nitrogen (N) doses, applied by fertigation and associated with different types of basal fertilization, on the growth and production of beet. The experiment was conducted at the Federal University of Campina Grande (UFCG), in a protected environment belonging to the Academic Unit of Agricultural Engineering (UAEA). The adopted statistical design was completely randomized blocks, with three replicates, and the factors were arranged in a 5 × 3 factorial scheme, corresponding to five N doses (0, 50, 100, 150 and 200 mg dm-3 of soil), and three types basal fertilization (soil without fertilizer, earthworm humus, earthworm humus + NPK). At 45 days after transplanting, the number of leaves per plant, plant height, stem diameter, leaf area, green intensity, bulb diameter, stem length, bulb fresh weight, bulb dry weight and total soluble solids (°Brix) were quantified. Both Soil basal fertilization significantly influenced beet growth and production, and the treatment with earthworm humus and earthworm humus + NPK led to the best results for the analyzed variables. The highest N dose promoted the best performance for stem diameter and content of total soluble solids (°Brix).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Basal fertilization significantly influenced beet growth and production.

Treatment
Soil basal fertilizatione0
Outcome
beet growth and productione0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris
Beta vulgaris · TaxonMichael Bakker Paiva · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Both Soil basal fertilization significantly influenced beet growth and production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1135–1216 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Earthworm humus gave the best results for measured beet variables.

Treatment
earthworm humuse0
Outcome
best results for the analyzed variablese0
Direction
beste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris
Beta vulgaris · TaxonMichael Bakker Paiva · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the treatment with earthworm humus and earthworm humus + NPK led to the best results for the analyzed variables”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1222–1333 · show in text ↑
e1

“beet growth and production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1190–1216 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Earthworm humus plus NPK gave the best results for measured beet variables.

Treatment
earthworm humus + NPKe0
Outcome
best results for the analyzed variablese0
Direction
beste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris
Beta vulgaris · TaxonMichael Bakker Paiva · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the treatment with earthworm humus and earthworm humus + NPK led to the best results for the analyzed variables”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1222–1333 · show in text ↑
e1

“beet growth and production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1190–1216 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The highest nitrogen dose gave the best beet stem diameter.

Treatment
highest N dosee0
Outcome
stem diametere0
Direction
beste0
Qualifier
200 mg dm-3 of soile1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris
Beta vulgaris · TaxonMichael Bakker Paiva · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest N dose promoted the best performance for stem diameter and content of total soluble solids (°Brix).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1335–1446 · show in text ↑
e1

“200 mg dm-3 of soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 776–795 · show in text ↑
e2

“beet growth and production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1190–1216 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The highest nitrogen dose gave the best beet total soluble solids content.

Treatment
highest N dosee0
Outcome
content of total soluble solids (°Brix)e0
Direction
beste0
Qualifier
200 mg dm-3 of soile1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris
Beta vulgaris · TaxonMichael Bakker Paiva · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest N dose promoted the best performance for stem diameter and content of total soluble solids (°Brix).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1335–1446 · show in text ↑
e1

“200 mg dm-3 of soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 776–795 · show in text ↑
e2

“beet growth and production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1190–1216 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · quality: sugar starch · Beta vulgaris (beet)Results differ

103 papers: 66 positive, 37 negative or no effect

65 papers in the same direction as this paper · 36 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

99 papers more in this group

See all 103 papers →

nitrogen · growth · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results

108 papers: 97 positive, 11 negative or no effect

96 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

104 papers more in this group

See all 108 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.