Paper · 2017 · Journal of Applied Genetics

Abiotic stresses influence the transcript abundance of PIP and TIP aquaporins in Festuca species

Izabela Pawłowicz; Marcin Rapacz; Dawid Perlikowski; et al.

8
claims
14
verbatim quotes
42
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Festuca arundinacea and F. pratensis are the models in forage grasses to recognize the molecular basis of drought, salt and frost tolerance, respectively. Transcription profiles of plasma membrane intrinsic proteins (PIPs) and tonoplast intrinsic proteins (TIPs) aquaporin genes were obtained for leaves of Festuca species treated with different abiotic stimuli. F. arundinacea plants were exposed to drought and salt stress, whereas F. pratensis plants were cold-hardened. Changes in genes expression measured with use of real time qRT-PCR method were compared between two genotypes characterized with a significantly different level of each stress tolerance. Under drought the transcript level of PIP1;2 and TIP1;1 aquaporin decreased in both analyzed F. arundinacea genotypes, whereas for PIP2;1 only in a high drought tolerant plant. A salt treatment caused a reduction of PIP1;2 transcript level in a high salt tolerant genotype and an increase of TIP1;1 transcript abundance in both F. arundinacea genotypes, but it did not influence the expression of PIP2;1 aquaporin. During cold-hardening a decrease of PIP1;2, PIP2;1, and TIP1;1 aquaporin transcripts was observed, both in high and low frost tolerant genotypes. The obtained results revealed that the selected genotypes responded in a different way to abiotic stresses application. A reduced level of PIP1;2 transcript in F. arundinacea low drought tolerant genotype corresponded with a faster water loss and a lowering of photosynthesis efficiency and gas exchange during drought conditions. In F. pratensis, cold acclimation was associated with a lower level of aquaporin transcripts in both high and low frost tolerant genotypes. This is the first report on aquaporin transcriptional profiling under abiotic stress condition in forage grasses.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought decreased PIP1;2 and TIP1;1 transcripts in both F. arundinacea genotypes.

Taxon
F. arundinaceaLolium arundinaceume0
Material
both analyzed F. arundinacea genotypese0
Treatment
droughte0
Gene
PIP1;2 and TIP1;1e0
Outcome
transcript level of PIP1;2 and TIP1;1 aquaporine0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium arundinaceum
Lolium arundinaceum · TaxonKrzysztof Ziarnek, Kenraiz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Under drought the transcript level of PIP1;2 and TIP1;1 aquaporin decreased in both analyzed F. arundinacea genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 661–778 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought decreased PIP2;1 transcripts only in the high drought tolerant F. arundinacea genotype.

Taxon
F. arundinaceaLolium arundinaceume0
Material
high drought tolerant plante0
Treatment
droughte0
Gene
PIP2;1e0
Outcome
PIP2;1e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium arundinaceum
Lolium arundinaceum · TaxonKrzysztof Ziarnek, Kenraiz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Under drought the transcript level of PIP1;2 and TIP1;1 aquaporin decreased in both analyzed F. arundinacea genotypes, whereas for PIP2;1 only in a high drought tolerant plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 661–836 · show in text ↑
t0

“Festuca species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–96 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Salt treatment reduced PIP1;2 transcript level in the high salt tolerant genotype.

Taxon
Festuca speciesFestucat0
Material
high salt tolerant genotypee0
Treatment
salt treatmente0
Gene
PIP1;2e0
Outcome
PIP1;2 transcript levele0
Direction
reductione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Festuca
Festuca · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A salt treatment caused a reduction of PIP1;2 transcript level in a high salt tolerant genotype”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 838–933 · show in text ↑
t0

“Festuca species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–96 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Salt treatment increased TIP1;1 transcript abundance in both F. arundinacea genotypes.

Taxon
F. arundinaceaLolium arundinaceume0
Treatment
salt treatmente0
Gene
TIP1;1e0
Outcome
TIP1;1 transcript abundancee0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium arundinaceum
Lolium arundinaceum · TaxonKrzysztof Ziarnek, Kenraiz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A salt treatment caused a reduction of PIP1;2 transcript level in a high salt tolerant genotype and an increase of TIP1;1 transcript abundance in both F. arundinacea genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 838–1013 · show in text ↑
t0

“Abiotic stresses influence”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–26 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Salt treatment did not affect PIP2;1 expression.

Taxon
Festuca speciesFestucat0
Treatment
salt treatmente0
Gene
PIP2;1e0
Outcome
expression of PIP2;1 aquaporine0
Direction
did not influencee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Festuca
Festuca · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A salt treatment caused a reduction of PIP1;2 transcript level in a high salt tolerant genotype and an increase of TIP1;1 transcript abundance in both F. arundinacea genotypes, but it did not influence the expression of PIP2;1 aquaporin”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 838–1074 · show in text ↑
t0

“Festuca species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–96 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cold hardening decreased PIP1;2, PIP2;1, and TIP1;1 transcripts in high and low frost tolerant F. pratensis genotypes.

Taxon
F. pratensisFestuca pratensist0
Treatment
cold-hardeninge0
Gene
PIP1;2, PIP2;1, and TIP1;1e0
Outcome
PIP1;2, PIP2;1, and TIP1;1 aquaporin transcriptse0
Direction
decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Festuca pratensis
Festuca pratensis · TaxonT.Voekler · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“During cold-hardening a decrease of PIP1;2, PIP2;1, and TIP1;1 aquaporin transcripts was observed, both in high and low frost tolerant genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1076–1220 · show in text ↑
t0

“whereas F. pratensis plants were cold-hardened”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 426–472 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reduced PIP1;2 transcript in low drought tolerant F. arundinacea corresponded with faster water loss.

Taxon
F. arundinaceaLolium arundinaceume0
Material
low drought tolerant genotypee0
Treatment
droughte0
Gene
PIP1;2e0
Outcome
water losse0
Direction
fastere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium arundinaceum
Lolium arundinaceum · TaxonKrzysztof Ziarnek, Kenraiz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A reduced level of PIP1;2 transcript in F. arundinacea low drought tolerant genotype corresponded with a faster water loss and a lowering of photosynthesis efficiency and gas exchange during drought conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1342–1551 · show in text ↑
t0

“Abiotic stresses”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–16 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reduced PIP1;2 transcript in low drought tolerant F. arundinacea corresponded with lower photosynthesis efficiency and gas exchange.

Taxon
F. arundinaceaLolium arundinaceume0
Material
low drought tolerant genotypee0
Treatment
drought conditionse0
Gene
PIP1;2e0
Outcome
photosynthesis efficiency and gas exchangee0
Direction
loweringe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium arundinaceum
Lolium arundinaceum · TaxonKrzysztof Ziarnek, Kenraiz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A reduced level of PIP1;2 transcript in F. arundinacea low drought tolerant genotype corresponded with a faster water loss and a lowering of photosynthesis efficiency and gas exchange during drought conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1342–1551 · show in text ↑

drought · molecular: metabolites · Lolium arundinaceum (tall fescue)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 1 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect
See all 4 papers →

drought · molecular: expression · Lolium arundinaceum (tall fescue)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 3 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

cold · molecular: expression · Festuca pratensis (meadow ryegrass)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. no effect
See all 2 papers →

salinity · molecular: expression · Lolium arundinaceum (tall fescue)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.