Abstract
A field experiment was conducted at CCS Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar during rabi 2011-12 and 2012-13 to study improvement of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) yield by different row spacing and varieties. Three wheat varieties viz. DBW 17, PBW 550 and WH 711 with four row spacings (15.0, 17.5, 20.0 and 22.5 cm) were studied in experimentation split plot design. Results of the experiment revealed that all parameters including growth, yield and yield attributes were significantly influenced by different row spacings. Based on pooled mean data, maximum plant height (90.8 cm) and effective tillers/ m 2 (481) were recorded in 15.0 cm row spacing crop, which were significantly higher than wider row spacing whereas, highest 1000 grain weight (42.7 g) and grains/earhead (41.9) were observed in 22.5 cm row spacing. The highest grain yield (54.0 q/ha) and straw yield (84.7 q/ha) were recorded when crop was sown at 15.0 cm row spacing, which was significantly higher than 20.0 and 22.5 cm row spacing crop. Among the cultivars, WH 711 recorded highest 1000 grains weight (43.5 g), whereas maximum grains/earhead were recorded in PBW 550 (41.9). Maximum grain yield (52.7 q/ha) was recorded in PBW 550 though the differences were non significant among different varieties, whereas, maximum straw yield (83.9 q/ha) was found in WH 711. Harvest index of PBW 550 (40.1) was significantly higher than DBW 17 and WH 711.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 12
Claim · model-written summary
Row spacing significantly influenced growth, yield and yield attributes of wheat.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivume0 - Treatment
- different row spacingse1
- Outcome
- growth, yield and yield attributese1
- Direction
- significantly influencede1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Improvement of Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) Yield by Different Row Spacings and Varieties”
e0“A field experiment was conducted at CCS Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar during rabi 2011-12 and 2012-13 to study improvement of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) yield by different row spacing and varieties”
e1“Results of the experiment revealed that all parameters including growth, yield and yield attributes were significantly influenced by different row spacings”
Claim · model-written summary
The 15.0 cm row spacing gave significantly higher plant height (90.8 cm) than wider row spacing.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivume0
- Treatment
- 15.0 cm row spacinge2
- Outcome
- plant heighte2
- Direction
- significantly highere2
- Value
- 90.8 cme2
- Comparator
- wider row spacinge2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Improvement of Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) Yield by Different Row Spacings and Varieties”
e0“A field experiment was conducted at CCS Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar during rabi 2011-12 and 2012-13 to study improvement of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) yield by different row spacing and varieties”
e2“maximum plant height (90.8 cm) and effective tillers/ m 2 (481) were recorded in 15.0 cm row spacing crop, which were significantly higher than wider row spacing”
Claim · model-written summary
The 15.0 cm row spacing gave significantly higher effective tillers (481 per m2) than wider row spacing.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivume0
- Treatment
- 15.0 cm row spacinge2
- Outcome
- effective tillers/ m 2e2
- Direction
- significantly highere2
- Value
- 481e2
- Comparator
- wider row spacinge2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Improvement of Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) Yield by Different Row Spacings and Varieties”
e0“A field experiment was conducted at CCS Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar during rabi 2011-12 and 2012-13 to study improvement of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) yield by different row spacing and varieties”
e2“maximum plant height (90.8 cm) and effective tillers/ m 2 (481) were recorded in 15.0 cm row spacing crop, which were significantly higher than wider row spacing”
Claim · model-written summary
The 22.5 cm row spacing gave the highest 1000 grain weight (42.7 g).
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivume0
- Treatment
- 22.5 cm row spacinge3
- Outcome
- 1000 grain weighte3
- Direction
- higheste3
- Value
- 42.7 ge3
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Improvement of Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) Yield by Different Row Spacings and Varieties”
e0“A field experiment was conducted at CCS Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar during rabi 2011-12 and 2012-13 to study improvement of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) yield by different row spacing and varieties”
e3“highest 1000 grain weight (42.7 g) and grains/earhead (41.9) were observed in 22.5 cm row spacing”
Claim · model-written summary
The 22.5 cm row spacing gave the highest grains per earhead (41.9).
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivume0
- Treatment
- 22.5 cm row spacinge3
- Outcome
- grains/earheade3
- Direction
- higheste3
- Value
- 41.9e3
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Improvement of Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) Yield by Different Row Spacings and Varieties”
e0“A field experiment was conducted at CCS Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar during rabi 2011-12 and 2012-13 to study improvement of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) yield by different row spacing and varieties”
e3“highest 1000 grain weight (42.7 g) and grains/earhead (41.9) were observed in 22.5 cm row spacing”
Claim · model-written summary
The 15.0 cm row spacing gave significantly higher grain yield (54.0 q/ha) than 20.0 and 22.5 cm row spacings.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivume0
- Treatment
- 15.0 cm row spacinge4
- Outcome
- grain yielde4
- Direction
- significantly highere4
- Value
- 54.0 q/hae4
- Comparator
- 20.0 and 22.5 cm row spacing crope4
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Improvement of Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) Yield by Different Row Spacings and Varieties”
e0“A field experiment was conducted at CCS Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar during rabi 2011-12 and 2012-13 to study improvement of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) yield by different row spacing and varieties”
e4“The highest grain yield (54.0 q/ha) and straw yield (84.7 q/ha) were recorded when crop was sown at 15.0 cm row spacing, which was significantly higher than 20.0 and 22.5 cm row spacing crop”
Claim · model-written summary
The 15.0 cm row spacing gave significantly higher straw yield (84.7 q/ha) than 20.0 and 22.5 cm row spacings.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivume0
- Treatment
- 15.0 cm row spacinge4
- Outcome
- straw yielde4
- Direction
- significantly highere4
- Value
- 84.7 q/hae4
- Comparator
- 20.0 and 22.5 cm row spacing crope4
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Improvement of Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) Yield by Different Row Spacings and Varieties”
e0“A field experiment was conducted at CCS Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar during rabi 2011-12 and 2012-13 to study improvement of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) yield by different row spacing and varieties”
e4“The highest grain yield (54.0 q/ha) and straw yield (84.7 q/ha) were recorded when crop was sown at 15.0 cm row spacing, which was significantly higher than 20.0 and 22.5 cm row spacing crop”
Claim · model-written summary
WH 711 had the highest 1000 grains weight (43.5 g) among the cultivars.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivume0
- Material
- WH 711e5
- Outcome
- 1000 grains weighte5
- Direction
- higheste5
- Value
- 43.5 ge5
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Improvement of Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) Yield by Different Row Spacings and Varieties”
e0“A field experiment was conducted at CCS Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar during rabi 2011-12 and 2012-13 to study improvement of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) yield by different row spacing and varieties”
e5“Among the cultivars, WH 711 recorded highest 1000 grains weight (43.5 g), whereas maximum grains/earhead were recorded in PBW 550 (41.9)”
Claim · model-written summary
PBW 550 had the maximum grains per earhead (41.9) among the cultivars.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Improvement of Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) Yield by Different Row Spacings and Varieties”
e0“A field experiment was conducted at CCS Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar during rabi 2011-12 and 2012-13 to study improvement of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) yield by different row spacing and varieties”
e5“Among the cultivars, WH 711 recorded highest 1000 grains weight (43.5 g), whereas maximum grains/earhead were recorded in PBW 550 (41.9)”
Claim · model-written summary
PBW 550 gave the maximum grain yield (52.7 q/ha), with differences among varieties not significant.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivume0
- Material
- PBW 550e6
- Outcome
- grain yielde6
- Direction
- Maximume6
- Value
- 52.7 q/hae6
- Comparator
- different varietiese6
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Improvement of Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) Yield by Different Row Spacings and Varieties”
e0“A field experiment was conducted at CCS Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar during rabi 2011-12 and 2012-13 to study improvement of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) yield by different row spacing and varieties”
e6“Maximum grain yield (52.7 q/ha) was recorded in PBW 550 though the differences were non significant among different varieties, whereas, maximum straw yield (83.9 q/ha) was found in WH 711”
Claim · model-written summary
WH 711 had the maximum straw yield (83.9 q/ha) among the cultivars.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Improvement of Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) Yield by Different Row Spacings and Varieties”
e0“A field experiment was conducted at CCS Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar during rabi 2011-12 and 2012-13 to study improvement of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) yield by different row spacing and varieties”
e6“Maximum grain yield (52.7 q/ha) was recorded in PBW 550 though the differences were non significant among different varieties, whereas, maximum straw yield (83.9 q/ha) was found in WH 711”
Claim · model-written summary
PBW 550 had a significantly higher harvest index (40.1) than DBW 17 and WH 711.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivume0
- Material
- PBW 550e7
- Outcome
- Harvest indexe7
- Direction
- significantly highere7
- Value
- 40.1e7
- Comparator
- DBW 17 and WH 711e7
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Improvement of Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) Yield by Different Row Spacings and Varieties”
e0“A field experiment was conducted at CCS Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar during rabi 2011-12 and 2012-13 to study improvement of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) yield by different row spacing and varieties”
e7“Harvest index of PBW 550 (40.1) was significantly higher than DBW 17 and WH 711”
The same questions in other papers
density · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
375 papers in the same direction as this paper · 115 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- positive
- positive
494 papers more in this group
See all 498 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.