Paper · 2016 · EURASIAN JOURNAL OF SOIL SCIENCE (EJSS)

Growth and yield response of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) to tillage and row spacing in maize-wheat cropping system in semi-arid region

Shafaqat Ali; Muhammad Shahid Ibin-i Zamir; Mujahid Farid; et al.

5
claims
6
verbatim quotes
20
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-sa

Abstract

Tillage practices and row spacing can be manipulated to optimize spatial distribution and plant growth, therefore maximizing sunlight, soil water use efficiency, nutrients and grain yield on sustainable basis. A field study was conducted to determine the effect of tillage and row spacing on growth and yield of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) at Agronomic Research Area, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad, Pakistan during wheat season. The treatments were comprised of two tillage practices viz. zero tillage and conventional tillage and four row spacing viz. 15 cm, 20 cm, 25 cm and 30 cm. The experimental results revealed that zero tillage significantly enhanced the plant height, tillers m -2 , spike length, 1000 kernel weight and yield and yield components of wheat plants as compared to conventional tillage. Wheat plants resulted in a significant increase in tillers m -2 and accumulated higher biomass and grain yield under 15-cm row spacing than all three other row spacing. The grain yield increase was mainly attributed to more tillers m -2 at 15cm than the other row spacing. So, zero tillage and narrow row spacing (15 cm) proved to be involved in higher wheat yield for the wheat-maize cropping system in semi-arid regions.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Zero tillage increased wheat plant height, tiller density, spike length, kernel weight, and yield relative to conventional tillage.

Treatment
zero tillagee0
Outcome
plant height, tillers m -2 , spike length, 1000 kernel weight and yield and yield componentse0
Direction
enhancede0
Comparator
conventional tillagee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“zero tillage significantly enhanced the plant height, tillers m -2 , spike length, 1000 kernel weight and yield and yield components of wheat plants as compared to conventional tillage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 632–816 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat at 15-cm row spacing had more tillers than at the other three spacings.

Treatment
15-cm row spacinge0
Outcome
tillers m -2e0
Direction
increasee0
Comparator
all three other row spacinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Wheat plants resulted in a significant increase in tillers m -2 and accumulated higher biomass and grain yield under 15-cm row spacing than all three other row spacing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 818–985 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat at 15-cm row spacing accumulated higher biomass than at the other three spacings.

Treatment
15-cm row spacinge0
Outcome
biomasse0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
all three other row spacinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Wheat plants resulted in a significant increase in tillers m -2 and accumulated higher biomass and grain yield under 15-cm row spacing than all three other row spacing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 818–985 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat at 15-cm row spacing had higher grain yield than at the other three spacings.

Treatment
15-cm row spacinge0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
all three other row spacinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Wheat plants resulted in a significant increase in tillers m -2 and accumulated higher biomass and grain yield under 15-cm row spacing than all three other row spacing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 818–985 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

More tillers at 15 cm were identified as the main reason for increased grain yield.

Outcome
grain yield increasee0
Qualifier
more tillers m -2 at 15cm than the other row spacinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The grain yield increase was mainly attributed to more tillers m -2 at 15cm than the other row spacing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 987–1089 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–57 · show in text ↑

density · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

110 papers: 81 positive, 29 negative or no effect

80 papers in the same direction as this paper · 29 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

106 papers more in this group

See all 110 papers →

density · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

498 papers: 376 positive, 122 negative or no effect

375 papers in the same direction as this paper · 115 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

494 papers more in this group

See all 498 papers →

tillage · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

1,414 papers: 1,116 positive, 298 negative or no effect

1,115 papers in the same direction as this paper · 257 in the opposite direction · 41 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1,410 papers more in this group

See all 1,414 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.