Paper · 2013 · Australian Journal of Crop Science

A comparison of the effects of acetochlor and fluoroglycofen on photosynthesis in grape leaves.

Wei Tan; Qingliang Li; Liang Ting; et al.

10
claims
23
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Herbicides are widely applied to control weeds in vineyards. However, they may also impose abiotic stresses on non-target crops. Paraquat, acetochlor and fluoroglycofen are three types of herbicides that are sprayed onto the soil beneath grapevines after the fruit develops. The study aimed to characterize the effects of these herbicides in combination on the photosynthetic characteristics and nutrition storage of grapevine branches throughout the growing season in Qufu, Shandong, China. The results were compared to control vines treated with artificial weeding. The application of the three herbicides reduced the net photosynthesis rate (Pn) in a dose-dependent manner. At the highest concentration, the Pn was reduced by 34.6% 35 d after treatment. By 58 d, there was no significant difference between the lower concentration of herbicides and artificial weeding. Moreover, the combination of herbicides with the highest concentration of each reduced the free amino acid and soluble protein content by 10.4% and 15.1%, respectively, in the fourth node branches. The results of the pot experiment showed that acetochlor and fluoroglycofen both reduced Pn in dose-dependent manner. Moreover, both herbicides also enhanced the malonaldehyde content and accelerated the production rate of superoxide anions in grapevines. Taken together, these results suggested that acetochlor and fluoroglycofen produced different degrees of poisonous effects in grapevines. We suggest that orchard management strategies should reduce the number and dosage of herbicides, or cover crops instead.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The three-herbicide treatment reduced net photosynthesis dose-dependently.

Taxon
vinese2
Treatment
three herbicidese1
Outcome
net photosynthesis rate (Pn)e1
Direction
reducede1
Comparator
artificial weedinge2

Verbatim

e0

“Paraquat, acetochlor and fluoroglycofen are three types of herbicides”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 129–198 · show in text ↑
e1

“The application of the three herbicides reduced the net photosynthesis rate (Pn) in a dose-dependent manner.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 568–676 · show in text ↑
e2

“control vines treated with artificial weeding.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 521–567 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At the highest herbicide concentration, net photosynthesis fell 34.6% after 35 days.

Taxon
grapet0
Treatment
highest concentratione0
Outcome
Pne0
Direction
reducede0
Value
34.6%e0
Comparator
artificial weedinge1

Verbatim

t0

“grape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–87 · show in text ↑
e0

“At the highest concentration, the Pn was reduced by 34.6% 35 d after treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 677–756 · show in text ↑
e1

“control vines treated with artificial weeding.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 521–567 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

At 58 days, the lower herbicide concentration did not significantly differ from artificial weeding for photosynthesis.

Taxon
grapet0
Treatment
lower concentration of herbicidese0
Outcome
net photosynthesis rate (Pn)e1
Direction
no significant differencee0
Comparator
artificial weedinge0

Verbatim

t0

“grape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–87 · show in text ↑
e0

“By 58 d, there was no significant difference between the lower concentration of herbicides and artificial weeding.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 757–871 · show in text ↑
e1

“net photosynthesis rate (Pn)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 620–648 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Highest combined herbicide concentration reduced free amino acid content by 10.4% in fourth-node branches.

Taxon
grapet0
Organ / stage
fourth node branchese0
Treatment
combination of herbicides with the highest concentration of eache0
Outcome
free amino acide0
Direction
reducede0
Value
10.4%e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“grape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–87 · show in text ↑
e0

“the combination of herbicides with the highest concentration of each reduced the free amino acid and soluble protein content by 10.4% and 15.1%, respectively, in the fourth node branches.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 882–1069 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Highest combined herbicide concentration reduced soluble protein content by 15.1% in fourth-node branches.

Taxon
grapet0
Treatment
combination of herbicides with the highest concentration of eache0
Outcome
soluble protein contente0
Direction
reducede0
Value
15.1%e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“grape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–87 · show in text ↑
e0

“the combination of herbicides with the highest concentration of each reduced the free amino acid and soluble protein content by 10.4% and 15.1%, respectively, in the fourth node branches.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 882–1069 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Acetochlor reduced grapevine net photosynthesis dose-dependently in pots.

Taxon
grapet0
Treatment
acetochlore0
Outcome
Pne0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“grape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–87 · show in text ↑
e0

“acetochlor and fluoroglycofen both reduced Pn in dose-dependent manner.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1116–1187 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fluoroglycofen reduced grapevine net photosynthesis dose-dependently in pots.

Taxon
grapet0
Treatment
fluoroglycofene0
Outcome
Pne0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“grape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–87 · show in text ↑
e0

“acetochlor and fluoroglycofen both reduced Pn in dose-dependent manner.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1116–1187 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Acetochlor increased malonaldehyde and superoxide production in grapevines.

Taxon
grapevinesVitise0
Treatment
acetochlore1
Outcome
malonaldehyde content and accelerated the production rate of superoxide anionse0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“both herbicides also enhanced the malonaldehyde content and accelerated the production rate of superoxide anions in grapevines.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1198–1325 · show in text ↑
e1

“acetochlor and fluoroglycofen both reduced Pn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1116–1161 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fluoroglycofen increased malonaldehyde and superoxide production in grapevines.

Taxon
grapevinesVitise0
Treatment
fluoroglycofene1
Outcome
malonaldehyde content and accelerated the production rate of superoxide anionse0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“both herbicides also enhanced the malonaldehyde content and accelerated the production rate of superoxide anions in grapevines.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1198–1325 · show in text ↑
e1

“acetochlor and fluoroglycofen both reduced Pn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1116–1161 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors advise reducing herbicide applications or using cover crops in orchards.

Taxon
grapet0
Outcome
reduce the number and dosage of herbicides, or cover crops insteade0

Verbatim

t0

“grape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–87 · show in text ↑
e0

“orchard management strategies should reduce the number and dosage of herbicides, or cover crops instead.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1480–1584 · show in text ↑

acetochlor · physiology: photosynthesis · VitisResults agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

herbicide · physiology: photosynthesis · VitisResults agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

herbicide · physiology: osmolytes · VitisResults agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.