Paper · 2017 · Journal of Crop Improvement

Solanum habrochaitesintrogression line grafted as rootstock in cultivated tomato maintains growth and improves yield under cold and drought stresses

Damodar Poudyal; Muhanad Akash; Laxman Khatri; et al.

5
claims
10
verbatim quotes
11
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Grafting tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) onto introgression lines (ILs) derived from S. habrochaites with introgression of a quantitative trait locus (QTL), stm9, for shoot turgor maintainer located on chromosome 9 has been suggested for improving yield under abiotic stresses. However, the physiological and agronomic responses of grafts with IL rootstocks to low root-zone temperature (RZT) and drought stresses are not yet clearly understood. Therefore, recurrent parent (RP) grafted onto IL and donor (D) rootstocks, and self-grafted IL and RP were examined at different combinations of optimal (20°–26°C RZT and well-watered) and suboptimal (10°C RZT and well-watered, and 20°–26°C RZT and cyclic drought) temperatures. Graft combinations were compared with self-grafted controls for dry weights, stomatal conductance (gs), leaf parameters, osmotic adjustment, and stress tolerance index. The RP grafted onto IL rootstocks regulated gs efficiently, retained the green trait, and produced higher biomass than the self-grafted RP. The IL rootstocks improved tolerance of the scion to drought and low RZT. Potential of IL rootstocks for improving tomato production under stressed conditions is discussed.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

RP grafted onto IL rootstocks regulated stomatal conductance efficiently relative to self-grafted RP.

Treatment
RP grafted onto IL rootstockse0
Outcome
gse0
Comparator
self-grafted RPe0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The RP grafted onto IL rootstocks regulated gs efficiently, retained the green trait, and produced higher biomass than the self-grafted RP”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 895–1033 · show in text ↑
t0

“Grafting tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–15 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

RP grafted onto IL rootstocks retained the green trait relative to self-grafted RP.

Treatment
RP grafted onto IL rootstockse0
Outcome
green traite0
Comparator
self-grafted RPe0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The RP grafted onto IL rootstocks regulated gs efficiently, retained the green trait, and produced higher biomass than the self-grafted RP”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 895–1033 · show in text ↑
t0

“Grafting tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–15 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

RP grafted onto IL rootstocks produced higher biomass than self-grafted RP.

Treatment
RP grafted onto IL rootstockse0
Outcome
biomasse0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
self-grafted RPe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The RP grafted onto IL rootstocks regulated gs efficiently, retained the green trait, and produced higher biomass than the self-grafted RP”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 895–1033 · show in text ↑
t0

“Grafting tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–15 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

IL rootstocks improved tomato scion drought tolerance.

Treatment
IL rootstockse0
Outcome
tolerance of the scion to droughte0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The IL rootstocks improved tolerance of the scion to drought and low RZT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1035–1107 · show in text ↑
t0

“Grafting tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–15 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

IL rootstocks improved tomato scion tolerance to low root-zone temperature.

Treatment
IL rootstockse0
Outcome
tolerance of the scion to drought and low RZTe0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The IL rootstocks improved tolerance of the scion to drought and low RZT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1035–1107 · show in text ↑
t0

“Grafting tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–15 · show in text ↑

grafting · disease · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

52 papers: 39 positive, 13 negative or no effect

38 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

48 papers more in this group

See all 52 papers →

grafting · soil: physics · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.