Paper · 2020 · International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences

Effect of Mulching and Methods of Irrigation on Okra (Hibiscus esculentus L. Moench)

Vinita Parte; Pratibha Dagore; Anjana Kujur; et al.

2
claims
4
verbatim quotes
5
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-sa

Abstract

Okra (Hibiscus esculentus L. Moench) or Lady’s finger is one of the important vegetables grown throughout the tropics and subtropics. It is one of the most important vegetable grown commercially almost during the year in India. Irrigation scheduling is considered as a vital component of water management to produce higher irrigation efficiency under any irrigation system, as excessive or sub-optimum irrigation both have detrimental effects on productivity parameters of okra (Aiyelaagbe and Ogbonnaya, 1996). Mulching is effective in reducing evaporation, conserving soil moisture and has been known to modify the hydrothermal regime of soil (Bhagat and Acharya, 1988) .The result of method of irrigation is found to be non significant due to continuous rainfall. Hence, there are no differences among the methods of irrigation. Mulching with plastic sheet in okra var. VRO-6 proved the best mulch practice which produced superior growth and yield attributing characters

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 2

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The method of irrigation had no significant effect on okra results.

Treatment
method of irrigatione1
Outcome
resulte1
Direction
no_changeinferrede2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Okra (Hibiscus esculentus L. Moench)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–36 · show in text ↑
e1

“The result of method of irrigation is found to be non significant due to continuous rainfall”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 673–765 · show in text ↑
e2

“Hence, there are no differences among the methods of irrigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 767–830 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plastic sheet mulching in okra var. VRO-6 gave superior growth and yield attributing characters.

Material
VRO-6e3
Treatment
Mulching with plastic sheete3
Outcome
growth and yield attributing characterse3
Direction
superiore3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“Mulching with plastic sheet in okra var. VRO-6 proved the best mulch practice which produced superior growth and yield attributing characters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 832–973 · show in text ↑

mulching · yield · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Positive and negative results

68 papers: 65 positive, 3 negative or no effect

64 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

64 papers more in this group

See all 68 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.