Paper · 2017 · Revista Caatinga

REGULATED DEFICIT IRRIGATION AND DIFFERENT MULCH TYPES ON FRUIT QUALITY AND YIELD OF WATERMELON

KLEITON ROCHA SARAIVA; THALES VINÍCIUS DE ARAÚJO VIANA; FRANCISCO MARCUS LIMA BEZERRA; et al.

5
claims
10
verbatim quotes
13
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

ABSTRACT The objective of this work was to assess the pulp resistance, soluble solids and yield of watermelon fruits grown under different irrigation managements (determined by the ISAREG model) and mulches, and their interactions. After a survey carried out on local producers, two experiments were conducted, using a completely randomized block design in split-plot arrangement with four replications, in the Teaching, Research and Extension Unit (UEPE) of the Federal Institute of Ceara (IFCE), Jaguaribe-Apodi Irrigation District (DIJA), State of Ceara, Brazil. The treatments consisted of four irrigation managements in the plots, M1 (100% of the available-water capacity (AWC) of the soil), M2 (80%), M3 (60%) and M4 (average water depth used by local producers) and four mulch types in the sub-plots, without mulching (C0) with rice husk (C1), white plastic (C2) and black plastic (C3) as mulches. The results were subjected to analysis of variance, and significant results were subjected to regression (irrigation managements), average test (mulches) and trend graphs (interaction between the factors). The irrigation management practiced during the watermelon crop cycle by the local producers of the Irrigation District of Jaguaribe-Apodi (DIJA) in the State of Ceara, Brazil, is not appropriated, since they usually apply more water than the highest water depth determined by the ISAREG model (100% of the AWC). The plants grown under irrigation water depth of 365.20 mm (M1) and soils with mulches of rice husk or white plastic had the highest yields and fruits with better quality of soluble solids and pulp resistance.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Local producers applied more irrigation water than the highest ISAREG depth.

Taxon
WATERMELONCitrullus lanatust0
Outcome
watere0
Direction
moree0
Value
100% of the AWCe0
Comparator
highest water depth determined by the ISAREG modele0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“they usually apply more water than the highest water depth determined by the ISAREG model (100% of the AWC)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1314–1421 · show in text ↑
t0

“WATERMELON”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–95 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Watermelon under M1 irrigation and rice husk mulch had the highest yields.

Taxon
WATERMELONCitrullus lanatust0
Treatment
irrigation water depth of 365.20 mm (M1) and soils with mulches of rice huske0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The plants grown under irrigation water depth of 365.20 mm (M1) and soils with mulches of rice husk or white plastic had the highest yields and fruits with better quality of soluble solids and pulp resistance.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1423–1632 · show in text ↑
t0

“WATERMELON”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–95 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Watermelon under M1 irrigation and white plastic mulch had the highest yields.

Taxon
WATERMELONCitrullus lanatust0
Treatment
irrigation water depth of 365.20 mm (M1) and soils with mulches of rice husk or white plastice0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The plants grown under irrigation water depth of 365.20 mm (M1) and soils with mulches of rice husk or white plastic had the highest yields and fruits with better quality of soluble solids and pulp resistance.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1423–1632 · show in text ↑
t0

“WATERMELON”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–95 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Watermelon under M1 irrigation and rice husk mulch had better soluble solids and pulp resistance.

Taxon
WATERMELONCitrullus lanatust0
Treatment
irrigation water depth of 365.20 mm (M1) and soils with mulches of rice huske0
Outcome
soluble solids and pulp resistancee0
Direction
bettere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The plants grown under irrigation water depth of 365.20 mm (M1) and soils with mulches of rice husk or white plastic had the highest yields and fruits with better quality of soluble solids and pulp resistance.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1423–1632 · show in text ↑
t0

“WATERMELON”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–95 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Watermelon under M1 irrigation and white plastic mulch had better soluble solids and pulp resistance.

Taxon
WATERMELONCitrullus lanatust0
Treatment
irrigation water depth of 365.20 mm (M1) and soils with mulches of rice husk or white plastice0
Outcome
soluble solids and pulp resistancee0
Direction
bettere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The plants grown under irrigation water depth of 365.20 mm (M1) and soils with mulches of rice husk or white plastic had the highest yields and fruits with better quality of soluble solids and pulp resistance.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1423–1632 · show in text ↑
t0

“WATERMELON”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–95 · show in text ↑

Oryza sativa · yield · Citrullus lanatus (watermelon)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

mulching · yield · Citrullus lanatus (watermelon)Results differ

44 papers: 36 positive, 8 negative or no effect

35 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

40 papers more in this group

See all 44 papers →

irrigation · disease · Citrullus lanatus (watermelon)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

mulching · disease · Citrullus lanatus (watermelon)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 4 positive, 2 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

irrigation · yield · Citrullus lanatus (watermelon)Positive and negative results

40 papers: 31 positive, 9 negative or no effect

30 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

36 papers more in this group

See all 40 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.