Paper · 2017 · International Journal of Agriculture Environment and Biotechnology

Modulating effect of salicylic acid in tomato plants in response to waterlogging stress

Sunil Kumar Singh; Ajay Kumar Singh; Padmanabh Dwivedi

7
claims
22
verbatim quotes
16
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The present investigation to investigate ameliorative effect of salicylic acid (SA) on waterlogged situation was carried out as pot culture experiment in tomato variety H-86 (Kashi Vishesh) in poly house with nine treatments including control in three replications under short term stress. The response of various morphological and biochemical attributes progressively reduced with the increased duration of waterlogged condition. Seeds treated with SA (50 and 100 ppm) or without SA, and foliar application of SA were given alone or in combination. Treated seeds significantly promoted seedling growth and ameliorated waterlogged stress induced responses as confirmed by the changes in growth pattern and several morphological and biochemical attributes. Among treatments, SA (50 ppm seed treatment combined with 100 ppm foliar spray) produced better results in terms of shoot length, leaf number, chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b, sugar and protein content, number of flower, number of fruits and fruit weight per plant as compared to waterlogging control plant.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Morphological and biochemical attributes of tomato progressively declined with longer duration of waterlogging.

Treatment
waterlogged conditione0
Outcome
response of various morphological and biochemical attributese0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The response of various morphological and biochemical attributes progressively reduced with the increased duration of waterlogged condition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 290–429 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–52 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

SA-treated seeds significantly promoted seedling growth in tomato under waterlogging.

Treatment
Treated seedse0
Outcome
seedling growthe0
Direction
promotede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Treated seeds significantly promoted seedling growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 550–602 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–52 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SA-treated seeds ameliorated waterlogged stress induced responses in tomato.

Treatment
Treated seedse0
Outcome
waterlogged stress induced responsese0
Direction
amelioratede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Treated seeds significantly promoted seedling growth and ameliorated waterlogged stress induced responses”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 550–655 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–52 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed treatment with 50 ppm SA combined with 100 ppm foliar spray produced better shoot length and leaf number than the waterlogging control in tomato.

Treatment
SA (50 ppm seed treatment combined with 100 ppm foliar spray)e0
Outcome
shoot length, leaf numbere2
Direction
bettere0
Comparator
waterlogging control plante1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“SA (50 ppm seed treatment combined with 100 ppm foliar spray) produced better results”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 774–859 · show in text ↑
e1

“as compared to waterlogging control plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1018–1059 · show in text ↑
e2

“shoot length, leaf number”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 872–897 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–52 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed treatment with 50 ppm SA combined with 100 ppm foliar spray produced better chlorophyll a and chlorophyll b than the waterlogging control in tomato.

Treatment
SA (50 ppm seed treatment combined with 100 ppm foliar spray)e0
Outcome
chlorophyll a, chlorophyll be2
Direction
bettere0
Comparator
waterlogging control plante1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“SA (50 ppm seed treatment combined with 100 ppm foliar spray) produced better results”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 774–859 · show in text ↑
e1

“as compared to waterlogging control plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1018–1059 · show in text ↑
e2

“chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 899–927 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–52 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed treatment with 50 ppm SA combined with 100 ppm foliar spray produced better sugar and protein content than the waterlogging control in tomato.

Treatment
SA (50 ppm seed treatment combined with 100 ppm foliar spray)e0
Outcome
sugar and protein contente2
Direction
bettere0
Comparator
waterlogging control plante1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“SA (50 ppm seed treatment combined with 100 ppm foliar spray) produced better results”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 774–859 · show in text ↑
e1

“as compared to waterlogging control plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1018–1059 · show in text ↑
e2

“sugar and protein content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 929–954 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–52 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed treatment with 50 ppm SA combined with 100 ppm foliar spray produced better number of flowers, number of fruits and fruit weight per plant than the waterlogging control in tomato.

Treatment
SA (50 ppm seed treatment combined with 100 ppm foliar spray)e0
Outcome
number of flower, number of fruits and fruit weight per plante2
Direction
bettere0
Comparator
waterlogging control plante1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“SA (50 ppm seed treatment combined with 100 ppm foliar spray) produced better results”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 774–859 · show in text ↑
e1

“as compared to waterlogging control plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1018–1059 · show in text ↑
e2

“number of flower, number of fruits and fruit weight per plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 956–1017 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–52 · show in text ↑

salicylic acid · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results differ

61 papers: 58 positive, 3 negative or no effect

57 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

57 papers more in this group

See all 61 papers →

salicylic acid · physiology: pigments · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

22 papers: 20 positive, 2 negative or no effect

19 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

18 papers more in this group

See all 22 papers →

salicylic acid · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

48 papers: 45 positive, 3 negative or no effect

44 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

44 papers more in this group

See all 48 papers →

salicylic acid · quality: protein · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

application · quality: protein · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 9 positive, 1 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

seed treatment · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

31 papers: 29 positive, 2 negative or no effect

28 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

27 papers more in this group

See all 31 papers →

application · physiology: pigments · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

61 papers: 55 positive, 6 negative or no effect

54 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

57 papers more in this group

See all 61 papers →

seed treatment · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

131 papers: 121 positive, 10 negative or no effect

120 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

127 papers more in this group

See all 131 papers →

8 of 12 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.