Paper · 2012 · Canadian Journal of Soil Science

Tillage and rotation effects on crop yield and profitability on a Black soil in northeast China

Ruqin Fan; Xiaoping Zhang; Aizhen Liang; et al.

9
claims
13
verbatim quotes
28
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Fan, R., Zhang, X., Liang, A., Shi, X., Chen, X., Bao, K., Yang, X. and Jia, S. 2012. Tillage and rotation effects on crop yield and profitability on a Black soil in northeast China. Can. J. Soil Sci. 92: 463–470. To evaluate the feasibility of no-tillage (NT) practices for Black soils (Mollisols) in northeast China, knowledge of the effects of different tillage and rotation combinations on crop yield and profitability is required. An 8-yr field experiment was conducted to investigate variation of corn (Zea mays L.) and soybean (Glycine max L. Merr.) yields and economic returns under NT, moldboard plow (MP) and ridge tillage (RT) combined with continuous corn (C-C-C), corn-soybean (C-S), and corn-corn-soybean (C-C-S) rotations. Under C-S rotation, corn and soybean yields were similar to or slightly higher in NT than in MP and RT; NT corn profitability was 15.9% higher than MP, and NT soybean profitability was even higher, 62.9 and 22.4% higher than MP and RT, respectively. There were no differences in crop yield and profitability between the C-C-S and C-C-C rotations. The C-S under NT produced better yield and profitability, particularly in dry years, than the C-C-C and C-C-S rotations. Accordingly, NT combined with C-S would be a good practice to increase crop yields and profitability for the Black soils in northeast China.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under C-S rotation, NT corn yields were similar to or slightly higher than under MP and RT.

Treatment
NTe1
Outcome
yieldse1
Direction
slightly highere1
Qualifier
similar to ore1
Comparator
MP and RTe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Under C-S rotation, corn and soybean yields were similar to or slightly higher in NT than in MP and RT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 738–840 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under C-S rotation, NT soybean yields were similar to or slightly higher than under MP and RT.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe1
Treatment
NTe1
Outcome
yieldse1
Direction
slightly highere1
Qualifier
similar to ore1
Comparator
MP and RTe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Under C-S rotation, corn and soybean yields were similar to or slightly higher in NT than in MP and RT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 738–840 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NT corn profitability was 15.9% higher than under MP.

Treatment
NTe2
Outcome
profitabilitye2
Direction
highere2
Value
15.9%e2
Comparator
MPe2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“NT corn profitability was 15.9% higher than MP”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 842–888 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NT soybean profitability was higher than under MP, by 62.9 (percent).

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe3
Treatment
NTe3
Outcome
profitabilitye3
Direction
highere3
Value
62.9e3
Comparator
MPe3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“NT soybean profitability was even higher, 62.9 and 22.4% higher than MP and RT, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 894–986 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NT soybean profitability was higher than under RT, by 22.4%.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe3
Treatment
NTe3
Outcome
profitabilitye3
Direction
highere3
Value
22.4%e3
Comparator
RTe3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“NT soybean profitability was even higher, 62.9 and 22.4% higher than MP and RT, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 894–986 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Corn crop yield and profitability did not differ between the C-C-S and C-C-C rotations.

Treatment
C-C-Se4
Outcome
crop yield and profitabilitye4
Direction
no_changeinferrede4
Comparator
C-C-Ce4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“There were no differences in crop yield and profitability between the C-C-S and C-C-C rotations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 988–1083 · show in text ↑
e5

“corn (Zea mays L.) and soybean (Glycine max L. Merr.) yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 503–563 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soybean crop yield and profitability did not differ between the C-C-S and C-C-C rotations.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe5
Treatment
C-C-Se4
Outcome
crop yield and profitabilitye4
Direction
no_changeinferrede4
Comparator
C-C-Ce4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“There were no differences in crop yield and profitability between the C-C-S and C-C-C rotations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 988–1083 · show in text ↑
e5

“corn (Zea mays L.) and soybean (Glycine max L. Merr.) yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 503–563 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under NT, the C-S rotation gave better yield and profitability than the C-C-C and C-C-S rotations, particularly in dry years.

Treatment
C-S under NTe6
Outcome
yield and profitabilitye6
Direction
bettere6
Qualifier
particularly in dry yearse6
Comparator
C-C-C and C-C-S rotationse6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e6

“The C-S under NT produced better yield and profitability, particularly in dry years, than the C-C-C and C-C-S rotations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1085–1204 · show in text ↑
e5

“corn (Zea mays L.) and soybean (Glycine max L. Merr.) yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 503–563 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

NT combined with C-S is recommended as a good practice to increase crop yields and profitability on Black soils in northeast China.

Outcome
increase crop yields and profitabilitye7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e7

“NT combined with C-S would be a good practice to increase crop yields and profitability for the Black soils in northeast China”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1219–1345 · show in text ↑
e5

“corn (Zea mays L.) and soybean (Glycine max L. Merr.) yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 503–563 · show in text ↑

tillage · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

390 papers: 264 positive, 126 negative or no effect

263 papers in the same direction as this paper · 100 in the opposite direction · 26 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

386 papers more in this group

See all 390 papers →

tillage · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

1,099 papers: 812 positive, 287 negative or no effect

811 papers in the same direction as this paper · 230 in the opposite direction · 57 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

1,095 papers more in this group

See all 1,099 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.