Paper · 2017 · Agronomy Journal

Strategic Nitrogen Supply Alters Canopy Development and Improves Nitrogen Use Efficiency in Dryland Wheat

Yi Zhou; Peter Hooper; David Coventry; et al.

10
claims
19
verbatim quotes
7
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Core Ideas Strategic application of N fertilizer produced a thinner and more open crop canopy. The smaller canopy delayed demand for soil moisture. The smaller canopy reduced shoot mortality and increased harvest index. Higher N uptake from sowing N application did not result in more harvest N. Strategic N application can improve yield in wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.) but the reliability of the response in dryland conditions is often low, leading to poor predictability of N responses. The objective of this study was to provide an understanding of how nitrogen use efficiency (NUE) could be improved by strategic N application. Experiments with seven N application timings and two N rates were conducted at two sites over two seasons to evaluate the effects of strategic N supply on N uptake, canopy development, and yield components. Delaying the application of N fertilizer initially produced a thinner, more open crop canopy, compared with application of N at sowing, as indicated by significantly lower light interception (LI) (68 vs. 80%), which was associated with reduced shoot mortality ( r = –0.71) and increased harvest index (HI) ( r = 0.71–0.96). Nitrogen applied only at sowing had higher preanthesis N uptake (96.6 kg N ha −1 vs. 78.1 kg N ha −1 ), but did not result in more grain N at harvest. A smaller canopy, resulting from lower initial N supply, was able to respond to late N application, potentially through retaining more soil water at anthesis (80 mm vs. 69 mm at 0–60‐cm depth). The results provide evidence that in rainfed wheat production systems, early season N application is an inefficient strategy to convert biomass and N into grain. Manipulating canopy development through N management can alter canopy size and water use patterns, to improve NUE and reduce risk in dry seasons.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Delayed nitrogen application lowered light interception to 68% versus 80% at sowing application.

Treatment
Delaying the application of N fertilizere0
Outcome
light interception (LI)e0
Direction
lowere0
Value
68e0
Qualifier
80%e0
Comparator
application of N at sowinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Delaying the application of N fertilizer initially produced a thinner, more open crop canopy, compared with application of N at sowing, as indicated by significantly lower light interception (LI) (68 vs. 80%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 840–1048 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–105 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Delayed nitrogen application produced a thinner, more open wheat canopy.

Treatment
Delaying the application of N fertilizere0
Outcome
thinner, more open crop canopye0
Comparator
application of N at sowinge0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Delaying the application of N fertilizer initially produced a thinner, more open crop canopy, compared with application of N at sowing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 840–974 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–105 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Light interception was negatively associated with shoot mortality.

Outcome
shoot mortalitye0
Direction
reducede0
Value
r = –0.71e0
Qualifier
associated withe0

Not reportedTreatment

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“which was associated with reduced shoot mortality ( r = –0.71) and increased harvest index (HI) ( r = 0.71–0.96).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1050–1163 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–105 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Light interception was associated with increased harvest index.

Outcome
harvest index (HI)e0
Direction
increasede0
Value
r = 0.71–0.96e0
Qualifier
increasede0

Not reportedTreatment

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increased harvest index (HI) ( r = 0.71–0.96).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1117–1163 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–105 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen at sowing yielded higher preanthesis nitrogen uptake, 96.6 versus 78.1 kg N per hectare.

Treatment
Nitrogen applied only at sowinge0
Outcome
preanthesis N uptakee0
Direction
highere0
Value
96.6 kg N ha −1e0
Qualifier
78.1 kg N ha −1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Nitrogen applied only at sowing had higher preanthesis N uptake (96.6 kg N ha −1 vs. 78.1 kg N ha −1 )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1164–1266 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–105 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen at sowing did not produce more grain nitrogen at harvest.

Treatment
Nitrogen applied only at sowinge0
Outcome
grain N at harveste0
Direction
did not result in moree0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Nitrogen applied only at sowing had higher preanthesis N uptake (96.6 kg N ha −1 vs. 78.1 kg N ha −1 ), but did not result in more grain N at harvest.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1164–1314 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–105 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A smaller canopy from lower initial nitrogen supply could respond to late nitrogen application.

Outcome
respond to late N applicatione0
Qualifier
lower initial N supplye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A smaller canopy, resulting from lower initial N supply, was able to respond to late N application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1315–1413 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–105 · show in text ↑
Associationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The smaller canopy potentially retained more soil water at anthesis, 80 versus 69 mm.

Treatment
lower initial N supplye0
Outcome
soil water at anthesise0
Direction
moree0
Value
80 mme0
Qualifier
69 mm at 0–60‐cm depthe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A smaller canopy, resulting from lower initial N supply, was able to respond to late N application, potentially through retaining more soil water at anthesis (80 mm vs. 69 mm at 0–60‐cm depth).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1315–1508 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–105 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude that early nitrogen application inefficiently converts biomass and nitrogen into grain in rainfed wheat.

Treatment
early season N applicatione0
Outcome
inefficient strategy to convert biomass and N into graine0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in rainfed wheat production systems, early season N application is an inefficient strategy to convert biomass and N into grain.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1543–1670 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors propose nitrogen management of canopy development to improve nitrogen use efficiency and reduce dry-season risk.

Treatment
Manipulating canopy development through N managemente0
Outcome
improve NUE and reduce risk in dry seasonse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Manipulating canopy development through N management can alter canopy size and water use patterns, to improve NUE and reduce risk in dry seasons.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1671–1816 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–105 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

2,061 papers: 1,737 positive, 324 negative or no effect

323 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1,737 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2,057 papers more in this group

See all 2,061 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.