Paper · 2016 · Revista de Ciências Agrárias

Efficiency of the inoculation of Trichoderma asperellum UFT-201 in cowpea production components under growth conditions in field

Lillian F. B. Chagas; Henrique G. de Castro; Brigitte S. O. Colonia; et al.

3
claims
8
verbatim quotes
10
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc

Abstract

The rhizosphere contains many microorganisms that can promote plant growth and protect the root system against infection by pathogens. Fungi of Trichoderma sp. are included in this group. The aim of this study was to evaluate efficiency of the inoculation of Trichoderma in agronomic performance of cowpea under field conditions, in the savanna in Gurupi, Tocantins, in harvests 2013/2014 to 2014/2015. The treatments consisted in seed treatment, with and without inoculation with Trichoderma asperellum UFT 201 with minimum concentration of viable conidia of 2x109 L-1, at a dose of 20 g kg-1 of seed. Biomass evaluations were made on efficiency, initial and final stands and survival in the use of Trichoderma in the stand maintaining and productivity. The results indicated that the ability of bio-protection and plant growth promotion were of great importance for the biomass production, the stand maintaining and cowpea productivity. In both harvests, survival was superior in the plants treated with Trichoderma, 23.0 and 13.2%, respectively, and yields were 9.5% higher compared to control for the two harvests. In general, the inoculation of Trichoderma provided the best results in the biomass variables analyzed for the two crops with higher productivity.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed inoculation with Trichoderma asperellum UFT 201 gave superior survival in cowpea plants, 23.0 and 13.2% in the two harvests.

Treatment
inoculation with Trichoderma asperellum UFT 201e1
Interactor
Trichoderma asperellum UFT 201Trichoderma asperellume1symbiont
Outcome
survivale2
Direction
superiore2
Value
23.0 and 13.2%e2
Setting
in the savanna in Gurupi, Tocantinse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Trichoderma asperellum
Trichoderma asperellum · InteractorTashkoskip · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“agronomic performance of cowpea under field conditions, in the savanna in Gurupi, Tocantins”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 274–365 · show in text ↑
e1

“with and without inoculation with Trichoderma asperellum UFT 201”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 447–511 · show in text ↑
e2

“survival was superior in the plants treated with Trichoderma, 23.0 and 13.2%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 957–1047 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed inoculation with Trichoderma asperellum UFT 201 raised cowpea yield by 9.5% compared with control in both harvests.

Treatment
inoculation with Trichoderma asperellum UFT 201e1
Outcome
yieldse3
Direction
highere3
Value
9.5%e3
Comparator
controle3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“agronomic performance of cowpea under field conditions, in the savanna in Gurupi, Tocantins”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 274–365 · show in text ↑
e1

“with and without inoculation with Trichoderma asperellum UFT 201”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 447–511 · show in text ↑
e3

“yields were 9.5% higher compared to control for the two harvests”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1053–1117 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Trichoderma inoculation gave the best results in the biomass variables of the two cowpea crops.

Treatment
inoculation of Trichodermae4
Outcome
biomass variablese4
Direction
best resultse4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“agronomic performance of cowpea under field conditions, in the savanna in Gurupi, Tocantins”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 274–365 · show in text ↑
e4

“the inoculation of Trichoderma provided the best results in the biomass variables analyzed for the two crops with higher productivity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1131–1264 · show in text ↑

Trichoderma asperellum · yield · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Trichoderma · growth · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

inoculation · yield · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results differ

116 papers: 99 positive, 17 negative or no effect

98 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

112 papers more in this group

See all 116 papers →

inoculation · survival · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

inoculation · growth · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

102 papers: 92 positive, 10 negative or no effect

91 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

98 papers more in this group

See all 102 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.